Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10m/6m Club
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 10m/6m Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is a ham radio hobbyist group. Their article indicates that they don't have any officers and their website says the group has 131 members. I don't see any way the group meets our notability guideline for organizations. chaser - t 02:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails notability per WP:ORG. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 03:09, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a group of this size and level of organisation, and without any secondary coverage that I can find, would not appear to meet the WP:ORG notability guideline. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Retain,Meets the following =Notability (organizations and companies):
"Simply stated, an organization is a group of more than one person formed together for a purpose. This includes commercial and non-commercial activities including, but not limited to, charitable organizations, educational institutions, hospitals, institutions, interest groups, organizations, social clubs, companies, partnerships, proprietorships, religious denominations, sects, etc."
"Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice." It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." Please consider notable and demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. Large organizations are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability; however, smaller organizations can be notable, just as individuals can be notable, and arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations. Djdubuque (talk) 15:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, while it probably is an organization, it's not notable. No reliable sources, none found via Google. Huon (talk) 14:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - and not because it is small, but because there are no sources confirming notability.Yobmod (talk) 15:40, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.