Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100年後
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Keeping and renaming to 100-nengo Wifione Message 13:50, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- 100年後 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NALBUMS Darkness Shines (talk) 12:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Ogre You Asshole#Discography per WP:NALBUMS. I couldn't find any coverage of the album online. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Changing to keep per Michitaro's sources. Nice job on finding those - my Japanese Google-fu obviously still isn't up to scratch. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment You might need to search with both the artist and album name to get any relevant results. The term "100年後" means "100 years later" in Chinese/Japanese. A quick Google search throws up this and this, though I'm not quite sure how reliable the articles are. Maybe someone fluent in Japanese could take a look at it. Funny Pika 15:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. If this article survives, it has to be retitled per MOS. I'll do some more searching, but this album did chart in Japan (#47 on Oricon). Michitaro (talk) 17:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. After more searching, I found a number more articles on the album and the tour supporting the album, such as [1] and [2], including some on major sources like Yahoo Japan: [3]. There were also a number of reviews of the album: [4], [5], etc. Combined with the charting and what FunnyPika found, I believe this passes WP:NALBUMS. Michitaro (talk) 00:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but rename per WP:MOS. Has received coverage, including reviews, by reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:11, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep then rename to 100 Nian Hou per WP:UE Satellizer talk contribs 00:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Since this is Japanese, it should be "100-nengo" (as in [6]). Whether the "n" should be capitalized is debatable. Michitaro (talk) 00:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd be inclined to go with "100-nen-go" because 年後 seems like two suffixes joined together. I wouldn't capitalise either, but as Michitaro says, it's debatable. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 02:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I went with "100-nengo" because that is Library of Congress romanization (as evident from the citation I gave). There are of course other romanization schemes, and WP:J-MOS has not determined that LC style is house style, but that's another discussion. Michitaro (talk) 18:01, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd be inclined to go with "100-nen-go" because 年後 seems like two suffixes joined together. I wouldn't capitalise either, but as Michitaro says, it's debatable. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 02:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Since this is Japanese, it should be "100-nengo" (as in [6]). Whether the "n" should be capitalized is debatable. Michitaro (talk) 00:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I'm not 100% sure on the notability of the album, but it appears that some was established (add it to the article guys!). — Statυs (talk, contribs) 14:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.