Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10-minute haircut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10-minute haircut[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There doesn't appear to be enough reliable coverage for this to meet WP:GNG. Coverage is mostly trivial, promotional or unreliable (blogs). Chickadee46 talk 21:10, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Chickadee46 talk 21:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete: Not even sure if this is supposed to refer to a particular company or a type of service, but there are no sources available either way. Safehaven86 (talk) 17:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DICDEF. It is unlikely to be expanded. Bearian (talk) 00:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no coverage available that indicates this topic is notable - it fails GNG. Wikipedia is also not a collection of indiscriminate information and this is not suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia.---Steve Quinn (talk) 02:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.