Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10-Pin Bowling (video game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

10-Pin Bowling (video game)[edit]

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawing my nomination as sources were found. (non-admin closure)NegativeMP1 21:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

10-Pin Bowling (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N failure. I couldn't find any sources for it besides listings and the IGN review already in the article, and one review is not enough to satisfy notability. NegativeMP1 17:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. NegativeMP1 17:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Very generic game with a generic title in itself that could apply to hundreds of games and proof of concept class projects. Nate (chatter) 17:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Mobygames lists reviews from Video Games and Total!, but I was unable to find a scan of the Total! review. With these two reviews and the IGN review on the article, appears to meet GNG. Waxworker (talk) 18:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per Waxworker and WP:NEXIST. It's clear more reviews were found so I would urge the nom to withdraw the deletion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 21:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.