Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10/GUI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Multi-touch. MBisanz ^talk 02:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

10/GUI[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google search doesn't seem to indicate any lasting notability, either under 10/GUI or Con10uum. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:27, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete found 1 article from 2009. Only one in-depth article means it fails WP:GNG Rockypedia (talk) 15:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep It is a interesting concept and has notability, just search "10/GUI Clayton Miller":

https://gizmodo.com/5382585/10gui-fascinating-multitouch-user-interface-design
https://techcrunch.com/2009/10/13/10gui-one-very-slick-desktop-multi-touch-concept-video/
http://newatlas.com/10gui-multi-touch-interface/13104/
https://everything2.com/title/10%252FGUI
http://appculture.net/exclusive-clayton-on-interface-design/
https://books.google.com/books?id=ym0HujqtEXMC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3&dq=10/GUI+Clayton+Miller&source=bl&ots=p-RA5RTJe1&sig=N9nPcEGJYz06wORaZXmi-fOjIUs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjq0Oa6kebWAhWIaRQKHbb3CGo4ChDoAQg4MAY
https://www.onsip.com/blog/10gui-and-changing-interaction-paradigms

Editor-1 (talk) 13:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can someone address the sources found?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 19:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Although it looks like this never went anywhere in the 8 years after its proposal, the references in TechCruch, Gizmodo, and engadget are significant, independent, and reliable. That passes WP:GNG and WP:NTEMP also applies. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge content into the history section of Multi-touch. None of the sources reflect notability beyond the industry sector. I'm honestly not sure if this meets WP:TOOSOON or is simply just WP:TOOLATE (yes, I know that guideline doesn't exist). All the tech sources make it clear this was a 'concept' - just a 2009 proposal by Clayton Miller, and now seemingly overtaken by the iPad etc. So this article fails to establish a notable product or application as in WP:NSOFT. It seems to be more WP:PROMO, but maybe there's just enough to make it worthy of retention in the multi-touch technology article, but not as a standalone one. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.