Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/...The Fame

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. per IAR, snow on the main AfD and common sense. Albums/singles from a non-notable and speedied artists aren't going to be notable either. Just because we can't A7 doesn't mean they need to run five days. TravellingCari 03:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...The Fame[edit]

Delete. Contested prod. Unreleased album by non-notable performer. Fails WP:MUSIC. WWGB (talk) 11:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, delete. Nothing even released yet, so can't be judged to be notable yet.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 11:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 11:35, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom not yet released.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:59, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Whilst the album itself does indeed not necessarily violate WP:CRYSTAL (or it wouldn't with some sources), the performer is non-notable. — neuro^(talk) 18:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Please add Its Pouring Rain and GHETTO BOI: Good Boy Gone Bad to this, it appears they are busy adding circular articles to make him look more notable. PHARMBOY (TALK) 00:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unreleased album by an artist who obviously does not meet WP:MUSIC. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.