Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/...And The Ever Expanding Universe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 08:53, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...And The Ever Expanding Universe[edit]

Non notable future release per WP:CRYSTAL BigDunc^Talk 16:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL; will suggest creator keeps copy in user space for possible inclusion if it becomes notable Chzz ► 16:46, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Userfy as per Chzz. Topic may become notable, userfication is the best outcome for this article. Oldlaptop321 (talk) 23:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Userfy. The fact that their last 2 albums have multiple reviews from a notable source, there is at least a snowballs chance that this one will too some time in the future. Userfy until such time, because as it stands now it doesn't pass WP:MUSIC#Albums. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 03:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to band page and merge any useful content there. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —--Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 15:57, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it's just a prediction that the subject will become notable in the future. When it's released and if it becomes notable, we can use it, but not now. The Earwig ^{(Talk | Contributions)} 02:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.