Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Željko Srdić

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 01:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Željko Srdić[edit]

Željko Srdić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Artist of no note, tagged for notability concerns for a while now. Contested prod, I can find no sources using google. Hiding T 22:48, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, article was created by an (almost) spa ZeljkoArtist so there may be coi issues, the serbian wikipedia doesn't appear to have an article on this artist - [1], a gsearch under "Željko Srdić", "Željko Srdić exhibitions", and "Željko Srdić изложбе" brings up nothing useable just facebook, blogs and mirror sites, have been unable to find citations for notable exhibitions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:05, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as failing WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:39, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - very poorly sourced for a BLP - PRWire, a blog, and his own website?! For the heck, I search and found a single news article (in Cyrillic) about the subject. Bearian (talk) 21:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Very poorly sourced. 1 is a primary source, 2 is a dead link to a press release, 3 is not about Srdić, 4 makes no mention of Srdić and 5 is a dead link. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:ARTISTMduvekot (talk) 10:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.