Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Świat Nieruchomości

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Do to lack of participation with no prejudice to a speedy renomination. Davewild (talk) 07:26, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Świat Nieruchomości[edit]

Świat Nieruchomości (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Journal established in 1991. No independent sources. Indexed in some non-notable databases (BezEkon and Central European Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities), in Index Copernicus (onJeffrey Beall's list of questionable companies producing misleading journal metrics), and a relatively obscure list of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (obviously biased towards locally-produced publications). Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 11:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 11:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 11:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:05, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.