Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Đặng Hữu Phúc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy keep -- article has been translated. Kusma (討論) 22:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Untranslated for two weeks on WP:PNT. Entry from there below. Kusma (討論) 23:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Vietnamese. — TheKMantalk 06:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as this is English Wikipedia, not Vietnamnese Wikipedia. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 05:18, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If nobody translated it in that time, it's probably not worth our time. Transwiki if you like. Stifle 16:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Raggaga 00:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I shoulda paid more attention earlier when it was still at WP:PNT. He's a Vietnamese composer. I'll put up a short article for him at Dang Huu Phuc and setup a redirect. --Diderot 17:19, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's done now, at Đặng Hữu Phúc, although Wikipedia has no clear policy with respect to Vietnamese. --Diderot 17:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Diderot's article of course (or speedy keep since the circumstances have changed so much) and thanks a lot to Diderot! Kusma (討論) 17:43, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, as per Kusma. Lukas (T.|@) 12:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep now, delist from here. Pavel Vozenilek 22:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.