Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/@properties
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 04:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- @properties (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not meeting CORP, sources are all press-releases or the like. No coverage in RS found, beyond routine mentions of business transactions. Oaktree b (talk) 01:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Companies, and Illinois. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 04:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.