Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/@field (video game) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@field (video game)

(Find video game sources: "@field (video game)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

I couldn't find WP:SIGCOV when conducting WP:BEFORE. The one source it has is a store link to purchase the game, and the article creator, 'David' used his name in the reference (maybe a COI but obviously very circumstantial). Seems like a game that exists, professionally published, just not notable. Mkdw ^talk 09:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it's a non-notable game, previously deleted at AfD, and it makes no attempt at showing notability. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:51, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as CSD G4 given the Nov 2012 AfD outcome. AllyD (talk) 12:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment regarding the CSD nomination: I thought it would be best not to speedy the article since the source it currently cites was present neither in the article's previous incarnation, nor in its previous deletion discussion. Furthermore, since the concerns raised at its first AfD revolved around its notability and coverage in external sources, I thought it best that the present discussion be played out here, rather than the article's fate being unilaterally decided by a Sysop. It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 18:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, though that PlayAsia shopping product listing looks miles short of being a WP:RS. At best, it confirms existence, not notability. AllyD (talk) 13:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) czar · · 16:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Cannot prove notability via Google or VGRS search for this recent game. No more than passing mentions as a launch title. Wasn't backed by sources to prove notability upon reinstatement. czar · · 16:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Though I should have noted that this game was only released in Japan, and I'd reconsider if credible Japanese sources surface. czar · · 00:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Awful writing. 2 sentences with one stating: @field is where golf and pinball met. Doesn't meet WP:Notability. Radioactiveplayful (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete again - non-notable and probably intended as advertising. Ansh666 21:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as before, still non-notable. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 15:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.