Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'Till I Collapse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, fails notability. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- 'Till I Collapse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete per WP:MUSIC#Songs, WP:V and WP:OR. Unlike the infobox of the article says, the song was not released as a single and therefore it doesn't deserve a separate. No citations and pure original research as well. Do U(knome)? yes...|or no · 00:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 02:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC#Songs & WP:COPYVIO for printing the lyrics. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. i highly doubt that the amount of lyrics quoted here could class as copyvio. that's a quote, pure and simple. If you were referring to an earlier version that quoted the whole song or something, then apologies (tho i think copyvio could easily be dealt with by the simple expedient of removing the lyrics). tomasz. 14:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not a single, never charted --T-rex 05:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep or Merge Wasn't a single, but the existance of remixes by very notable artists puts this beyond a simple album track, notability-wise. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect to The Eminem Show. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Merge what? It's all unsourced! Do U(knome)? yes...|or no · 21:25, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Merge what can be sourced, of course. "Unsourced" is not an insurmountable issue. tomasz. 11:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's a nice song, but the notable artists mentioned didn't do remixes (as far as I know), they contributed verses. Not notable per WP:MUSIC. The article makes a bunch of weasly unattributed claims about the song's reception. -Verdatum (talk) 17:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Just to point out that in hip-hop, remixes tend to take the form of different artists to the original/name artist, (though possibly also including them) contributing new verses over the same beat as the original. Therefore, the notable artists mentioned did do remixes and contribute verses here. In the crazy world of HH, it's the same thing — tomasz. 14:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply Fine. But I'm fairly certain Tupac didn't produce the remix...being that it's hard to book studio time post-mortem ;). -Verdatum (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply. But he's not dead, don't you know, Chuck D said so... nah, on a serious note, missed that one, you are of course completely right. Tee-hee. tomasz. 15:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply Fine. But I'm fairly certain Tupac didn't produce the remix...being that it's hard to book studio time post-mortem ;). -Verdatum (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Just to point out that in hip-hop, remixes tend to take the form of different artists to the original/name artist, (though possibly also including them) contributing new verses over the same beat as the original. Therefore, the notable artists mentioned did do remixes and contribute verses here. In the crazy world of HH, it's the same thing — tomasz. 14:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.