Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'Souls RPG
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW closure. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- 'Souls RPG (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
delete as non-notable per WP:GNG, all refs are internal Deunanknute (talk) 00:31, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It did not have any meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources search (either as "souls rpg" or "bleeding souls"). There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar ⨹ 02:31, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per Czar. — Joaquin008 (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - per Czar. I couldn't find any third party reliable sources for this game. (There are some false-positives out there because there's a number of unrelated JRPGs with the word "Soul" in the title. Sergecross73 msg me 17:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.