Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Route Avec Cypres"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:52, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Route Avec Cypres"[edit]

Article says nothing about its title. Denni ☯ 02:51, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unnecessary. We don't need an article describing an individual painting of Van Gogh's. Maybe do a redirect. Devotchka 02:57, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Au contraire. Wikipedia has at least 11 pages covering individual paintings of Van Gogh, and many others by other artists. ♠DanMS 04:25, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - I spoke too soon. I just didn't think this one qualified for its own article. I support keeping it if someone can make a real article out of what we've got so far. (Basically nothing.) Devotchka 05:16, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, clean up and move to Route Avec Cypres. Notable painting by notable artist. Capitalistroadster 05:04, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless rewritten. While I agree about notability, the nom is correct that this article says nothing and it would take a specialist to make more than a stub out of an individual painting. The full title should be Route avec Cypres et Ciel Etoile if kept. Dlyons493 Talk 05:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: you can find the other painting articles at Category:Vincent van Gogh. -- Kjkolb 06:41, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. There's nothing stopping someone from writing an article about this particular painting in the future, right? The painting is notable, but the entry is not even a stub. TECannon 12:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not against articles about individual paintings in principle, but strip out the POV and we've got "This is a painting by Vincent Van Gogh, who painted The Cracked Vase With The Big Daisies, which is a very good painting." Both points are covered by their own articles, to say the least. --Last Malthusian 14:04, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment article is an orphan.Geni 15:21, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redirect to Van Gogh for now. R adiant _>|< 00:47, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to van Gogh for now. Wile E. Heresiarch 07:11, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Barely an article here to debate. Marcus22 13:18, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --->Newyorktimescrossword 19:27, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.