Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"R" Is for Ricochet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per WP:BOOK; notability clearly established, with verifiable and reliable sources. PeterSymonds (talk) 00:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- "R" Is for Ricochet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable book, article possibly created just to substantiate article Santa Teresa, California article. MY♥INchile 23:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep I don't understand the rationale here. The book is definitely notable, two sources are cited in the article, and Sue Grafton is a notable author, so I bet there's way more to say about this book. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:05, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Echo everything TPH said. I'll grant that there's not much here, but 2 sources for a one sentence article makes about as verified as you can get. Suggest that the nominator withdraw. Beeblbrox (talk) 00:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.