Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Downer" Issues at DMV Hearings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Rob ert 23:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Downer" Issues at DMV Hearings[edit]

As per most of Darren's articles, it is original research, which is part of what Wikipedia is not. He has reverted several of our PROD tags, and as such we (jwestbrook and myself) are nominating all of his contributions for deletion.--HubHikari 20:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fixed afd nomination J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 20:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not sure about the OR call, but sufficiently many other problems (POV, vanity references, possibly nn, not linked in with rest of WP) to warrant deletion. Content looks like it belongs as a subsection on another page. Paddles 23:01, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. incog 21:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, author's crusade, not encyclopedic NawlinWiki 18:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination was incomplete, listing now. - Liberatore(T) 12:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and also examine Accident reconstruction to see if an actual article can be made out of it, or if it should also be AfD'd. -- Kicking222 13:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Accident reconstruction was rewritten more in keeping with the title. I removed the prod since it no longer applies to the current content. It does need some other editors to improve on what I replaced the old DUI in California article with. Vegaswikian 22:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, and I suspect Accident reconstruction might be a good article title, but I see little if anything salavgeable in that article. Fan1967 15:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above —M e ts501^talk 16:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.