Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/!deargirlloveme!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 01:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

!deargirlloveme!

Unsigned, self-releasing band - does not seem to pass WP:BAND. Some references are provided, but none appear notable and some are unrelated. FlyingToaster 02:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 03:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BAND. I nearly speedied this as an A7, but believe that while this is definitely not notable, it's not quite speedyable. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--yet another MySpace band. I took the liberty of removing some of the fluff, to enhance our reputation. Drmies (talk) 05:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per Drmies. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 10:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 13:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete classic speediable garage-band article. No label, no albums, no sources, no nothin'. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with nom that it fails WP:BAND. Matt (talk) 02:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.