Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009/Comments/SirFozzie

This is a public page for voters who wish to comment briefly on the candidacy of SirFozzie or the way they have voted in relation to the candidate. For extended discussion, please use the attached talk page.

Voting in the December 2009 Arbitration Committee elections will be open until 23:59 UTC on 14 December 2009, at which time this page will be archived.

To cast your vote, please go to your personal SecurePoll ballot page. Only votes submitted through the SecurePoll election system will be counted.

Candidate statement • Questions for the candidate • Comment on the candidate • Discuss the candidate

Comments

• Neutral. This summary is useful. Candidate has some good qualities, but doesn't play a straight enough bat to get my support. SilkTork *^YES! 17:15, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

  Note: This comment is the subject of discussion on the talkpage.  Skomorokh  07:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

• I have voted to Oppose this candidate and many other candidates due to significant involvement in drama on the Wikipedia project. Whether or not I agree with the candidate's stances in such conflicts is negligible. I simply cannot contribute my support to anyone that could potentially devalue the integrity of the Arbitration Committee more than it already has. I desire to cancel the soap opera, rather than help renew it for another season with brand new cast members. Vodello (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
• Support. Reading your answers I felt like you were thinking out loud, I knew your positions and what drove them. Sole Soul (talk) 10:37, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
• Support I debated this one, but following some of the goings-on at The Troubles shows that you will wade in and do what needs to be done. Some are not happy about that, but note that many of us agree that sometimes a firm stance is needed. I also not a well-developed BS-detector that will likely come in handy. King Pickle (talk) 03:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Support due to views on policy leadership. Gigs (talk) 16:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
• Support as trusted and has needed experience, see User:Camaron/ACE2009 for details. Camaron · Christopher · talk 21:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose strongly. Not a net contributor imo. A player and a politician, not a builder. Grace Note (talk) 07:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)