User talk:Vida0007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vida0007, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Vida0007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jas![edit]

Hi Jas! JavaHurricane from HW here. Could you help me with Typhoon Hagupit (2008), please? --JavaHurricane (talk) 12:35, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! How may I help improving the page? Vida0007 (talk) 13:39, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to find sources for the damage. Could you help me with them? JavaHurricane (talk) 09:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not? Sorry for the late reply here, haven't checked my profile for days. Vida0007 (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invite![edit]

Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply click here to accept!

Janm 7 (talk) 21:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for inviting me. I have already put my name there. Vida0007 (talk) 05:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to the Tropical cyclone WikiProject! We are a group of Wikipedia editors who help to improve articles related to tropical cyclones on Wikipedia.

Looking for somewhere to start? Here are a few suggestions.

If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page.

SMB99thx my edits 12:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for deaths due to COVID-19 and related RfC[edit]

Hi. Thanks for commenting at the recent AfD for the above list. There is now an ongoing discussion around the best way to split the list, if any, if you wish to comment further. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

44th edition of The Hurricane Herald![edit]

Volume XLIV, Issue 44, December 1, 2020
←(Previous issues) 41 · 42 · 43 · 44 · 45


The Hurricane Herald: Happy Thanksgiving Edition!

The Hurricane Herald is the semi-regular newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from October 5–November 30, 2020. This edition's editors and authors are SMB99thx, Weatherman27, Chicdat, Hurricanehink, Cyclone Toby, Typhoon2013, and ChessEric. Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here.

WikiProject Tropical Cyclones: News & Developments


New articles since the last newsletter include:

New GA's include:

Featured Content

From October 5 to November 30, two featured articles were promoted:

From the Main Page documents WikiProject related materials that have appeared on the main page from October 5–November 30, 2020 in chronological order.

Today's Featured Article/List

There is currently one featured article candidate:

WikiProject To-Do



Here are some tasks you can do:

Current assessment table


Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics.
As of this issue, there are 164 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 133 A-class articles, and 1,010 good articles. There are only 71 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 415 C-class articles, 788 start-class articles, and 182 stub-class articles, with 23 lists, and 9 current articles. These figures mean that slightly more than half of the project is rated a GA or better. Typhoon Warren was the 1000th GA in the project.

About the assessment scale →

Project Goals & Progress


The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page.

Storms of the month over the last year
Month Storm
November 2020 Hurricane Iota
October 2020 Typhoon Goni (2020)
September 2020 Cyclone Ianos
August 2020 Hurricane Laura
July 2020 Hurricane Isaias
June 2020 Tropical Storm Cristobal (2020)
May 2020 Cyclone Amphan
April 2020 Cyclone Harold
March 2020 Cyclone Herold
February 2020 Cyclone Damien
January 2020 Cyclone Tino
December 2019 Cyclone Ambali
November 2019 Cyclone Bulbul
October 2019 Typhoon Hagibis

Storms of the month and other tropical activity for October and November


SotM for October: Typhoon Goni / Rolly
Typhoon Goni formed from east of The Philippines towards the end of October, just as Typhoon Molave ravaged the country. Taking in the plentiful favorable conditions, Goni, known as Rolly in The Philippines, explosively intensified into a Category-5 equivalent hurricane just three days after it became a tropical depression. An eyewall replacement cycle managed to curb its intensification. Goni finished the cycle a few hours before it made landfall, and explosively intensified again into winds of 195 mph (JTWC) and a pressure of 884 mbar. This allowed it to tie with typhoons Haiyan and Meranti as the strongest typhoon by wind speed. Goni made landfall at peak intensity, killing 25 people and causing US$368 million in damage.


SotM for November: Hurricane Iota
Hurricane Iota developed in the central Caribbean Sea in mid-November. Like Goni, it explosively intensified, strengthening 120 mph in 48 hours, and deepening 81 mbar in the same amount of time. Iota explosively strengthened late on November 15 and early on November 16, becoming a Category 5 hurricane at 15:00 UTC on the 16th. By the time Iota had achieved C5 intensity, three people were already dead in Colombia due to landslides. As the storm made landfall, and subsequently weakened and dissipated, adding to the destruction from Hurricane Eta. Iota killed at least 61 people.


  • Atlantic - Gamma, Delta, Epsilon, Zeta, Eta, Theta, Iota.

The active Atlantic hurricane season continued. In early October, Tropical Storm Gamma dissipated over the northern Yucatan and was absorbed by powerful Hurricane Delta, which was the season's third major hurricane. Delta weakened before hitting Quintana Roo, but restrengthened in the Gulf of Mexico, later hitting Louisiana as a low-end Category 2 hurricane in nearly the same location as Hurricane Laura in August. Delta killed six people and left US$4 billion in damage. A few days later, Hurricane Epsilon developed southeast of Bermuda, becoming a major hurricane and brushing the island to the east. Hurricane Zeta followed a similar path as Delta, striking Quintana Roo and later striking southeastern Louisiana as a Category 2 hurricane; it killed 8 people and left U$3 billion in damage. At the end of the month, Hurricane Eta developed, becoming a strong Category 4 hurricane before striking Nicaragua. After killing hundreds of people in Central America, Eta reformed in the northwestern Caribbean. It made another landfall in Cuba, moved over the Florida Keys, and briefly became a hurricane again in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, before weakening and striking Cedar Key, Florida as a tropical storm. In early November, Tropical Storm Theta developed from a non-tropical low and moved across the eastern Atlantic.

Member of the month (edition) – Robloxsupersuperhappyface


Robloxsupersuperhappyface joined Wikipedia in July of this year, and has become the most prolific tropical cyclone editor relating to current events, as well as playing an enormous role in creation of newly formed tropical cyclones that eventually became destructive in many regions they are affected in (Hurricane Sally to Gulf Coast of the United States, Typhoon Goni to the Philippines, and Hurricane Iota to Central America respectively - Also, both Goni and Iota are Storms of the Month!). Because of that reason, Robloxsupersuperhappyface's articles are the one of the most viewed tropical cyclone articles in this year - as well as helped us on inviting prospective tropical cyclone editors to this project as they edited Robloxsupersuperhappyface's articles, leading into why we have more than 100 members in this WikiProject leading to this issue. As the result of brilliant Robloxsupersuperhappyface's contributions, we want to give many, many thanks to Super for helping this WikiProject grow so much recently. Happy Thanksgiving!

New WikiProject Members since the last newsletter - project membership is over 100 now!


More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue. Sorted chronologically in order of which they joined.

To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!

Let's talk about that - An opinion piece by Weatherman27


Before I start, I would like to link everyone to a new essay regarding Force Thirteen. Here it is: WP:F13. I recommend users (old and new) to read this to understand why we don't use Force Thirteen as a source, and why it isn't a reliable source. If you want to see what good reliable sources are, read this: WP:WPTC/AS Now, I will get to the main point of this opinion piece.


Recently, I have gotten more involved in talk pages, and sharing my ideas and/or my opinions on different issues or ideas that have come up, primarily on 2020 Atlantic hurricane season's talk page. As I have discussed these thoughts and ideas with other editors, I have noticed and experienced some things such as being personally attacked, which has led me to want to reiterated some key points here. Despite the fact that they are mentioned commonly at the top of talk pages, I want to bring these up as it is important to have a good base where people can properly chat and discuss topics in peace.

1. Treat others with respect This one can't be stressed enough. Especially on talk pages, it is a place where you and your peers communicate issues, opinions, or ideas to each-other. This means discussing topics in a kind and adult manner. There is nothing wrong with disagreeing in what somebody may say, but that does not mean that you have the right to put them down for not having similar views. It is simply the Golden Rule.

2. Assume Good faith Along with my first point, I feel this one needs to be brought up. People have different opinions, and that is all right, but just because you may not agree with it or what they say, does not mean that it was not out of good faith. They were most likely voicing what they think on the subject, and that is alright. This also goes for edits. Unless it is pretty obvious that a user as vandalized something, it is always good to assume good faith, as other people might not know the rules as well as a more experienced editor.

3. Avoid Personal attacks This is a very important subject that needs to be remembered not just on talk pages, but on all other parts of Wikipedia as well. On talk pages, discussions can get pretty tense and heated, and I admit that I have gotten into a few of these arguments as well. Despite this, it is never okay to attack someone. As a user who has gotten personally attacked before, I can definitely say that it does not feel good, and usually the person who made the attacked will get warned or blocked, so please be kind and accept what other people have to say, because you will get nowhere by being rude.

4. Come to a consensus (preferably a clear one) On talk pages, whenever there is a discussion regarding something important like the merging of an article, people need to decide what the outcome of something important on a talk page. For example, if there is say, a merge discussion for an article on a tropical cyclone, many people will give their input. Usually, different people will have different views on whether to merge or keep the article. Sometimes, the editor will close the discussion early, but this is usually for unrelated reasons, though it sometimes may be because the editor had a change of mind. Now, if there is support for say a merge of the article, then that will be the consensus and the discussion will be closed and the article merged. This can also happen on the opposite side, if an article is to be kept, the discussion will be closed and article kept. Simply put, it is important to discuss and come to a clear decision if there is a consensus involved, to avoid difficulty with the article or page in the future.

These are just a few examples of things that editors of the WPTC need to remember when using talk page discussions. There are plenty of other things not mentioned here that are just as important when it comes to using talk pages. I made this simply to help remind editors the key points when using the discussions, and I hope these were helpful to new users as well as veterans. We need to really get better at staying calm and keeping civil. I have noticed lots of hostility and arguing lately, as well as edit warring and disputes. We need to work this out. We are supposed to work together as WPTC editors, so please fix it. It is sad seeing so many editors getting reported or having to get blocked from this. Once again, keep discussions civil and have a good day. Signing off,

🌀Weatherman27🏈

My experiences as a WikiProject Tropical cyclones member by SMB99thx


Hello again, people of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones! In here, I want to tell how my experiences with WikiProject Tropical Cyclones changed my views on WikiProjects, helped me out of trouble and to be able to regain the trust of many people in Wikipedia.


When I joined WikiProject Tropical cyclones, it was the second WikiProject I have ever joined. The first WikiProject I have ever joined is WikiProject COVID-19, and the reason why I joined that project is to gain trust of people when I contributed to COVID-19 articles and as well as my fight against an IP editor which turned out to be the LTA named Bedriczwaleta (and has been active much more longer than I thought, since February of last year (!!!!)). I have the same thought process (and combined with my plans of editing old season articles, which is not done yet) when I first joined this WikiProject, but joining the WikiProject Tropical cyclones turned out to be something different. It led me to know what are the purposes of WikiProjects are and in turn led me to join many other WikiProjects since.

As such, what made me change my views on WikiProjects during my time as a WikiProject Tropical Cyclones?

First of all, I have seen that WikiProject Tropical cyclones members always actively work together to advance project goals, actively participating in discussions and give much-needed advice on new WikiProject Tropical cyclones members (including me). Second, WPTC really cares about our articles (and the assessments) as part of their project goals. 2018 FT project and Meteorological history of Hurricane Dorian (Four Award!) is a prime example of this. Third, we are actively welcoming the new members of this WikiProject and giving these members opportunity to succeed with us by i.e. giving out WikiLove (barnstars). Fourth, we, like WP COVID-19, actively fight against vandals and other LTAs e.g. Sidow........., UnderArmorKid, and Iphonehurricane95.

These kinds of activity led me to change my belief on what WikiProjects truly are. You could see this kind of activity on other good WikiProjects like WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors, which I just joined recently on 26 October 2020 as of this newsletter and WikiProject Articles of Creation, which I have interest on joining but I might not be able to.

Now, why WikiProject Tropical cyclones brought me out of trouble (and Chicdat, for that matter)?

WikiProject Tropical cyclones is generally a content-creating WikiProject. We really care about improving tropical cyclone coverage on Wikipedia. Members of this WikiProject generally encouraged to communicate and discuss (in Wikipedia, in Discord, or in IRC channel), and this is what helped me and Chicdat out from trouble since our discussions from what I have seen is not always administrative.

Before I joined WikiProject Tropical cyclones (and when I was still new to WikiProject Tropical cyclones), I have been putting myself on trouble numerous times. I was an ANI regular, and as an ANI regular I detailed about my struggle to deal with the LTA Bedriczwaleta and I'm was also putting up IBAN proposals of User:Jadebenn and User:Moamem as well as User:U1Quattro and User:1292simon. While I have managed to get my proposal succeeded and finally got Bedriczwaleta back on track for a while (what I thought), in August 20 (as I was about to finalize my decision to enter my college I'm currently in right now) I got myself into serious trouble against IP range 185.66.252.0/23 (which is apparently good at programming - I'm not). I tried to get them blocked for PA (calling me a thief who has a black soul), but this is where when I realized that I had to attribute things I copied within Wikipedia and I had to apologize to the user. Since then, I did my best to attribute everything I had copied articles from (Example) and I also realized that ANI is not for me (as I do not want to get into troubles by just being there), which led me to quitting ANI until November of this year when I decided to involve myself on Miggy72 dispute (now banned for sockpuppetry - Miggy72 could have been invited to WPTC if he stopped on insisting to create non-notable topics).

After that incident with the IP range 185.66.252.0/23, I have stated that I do not want to get myself into trouble as a presence in ANI. As such, I decided to focus on what I want to do, which is to continue my project of splitting season articles of the yesteryear and began to increasingly involve myself within the project - to look for help and giving the best help that I can do for this WikiProject. The activity from that September led me to become Member of the Month in the previous edition of this newsletter. It was a comeback that I needed, and I want to thank WikiProject Tropical cyclones (especially Hurricanehink) for getting me on this situation. Without their help, I'm not sure if I could be here on this day.

Now, for the final question – why this WikiProject helped me (and Chicdat) regain trust of many people in Wikipedia?

As I stated before, this WikiProject encourages discussion within other members of this WikiProject, which in turn encourages close involvement in all sides of this WikiProject. Because of this, some people are actually helping us learning policies in Wikipedia as the time goes on, rather than falling in into blocks. As such, with time, I have seen that some admins are open for Chicdat to become a rollbacker, while I got hold on several automated gadgets that was more useful. It appears that these tools are the reason why these people are one of the more trusted people in Wikipedia, which in turn helped me a lot at gaining trust. Someday in the future, I'm looking to become an admin by myself. But that's for the another day. For now, what I'm currently doing now is to work at my craft to eventually prepare for the day when I will seek for adminship in the years ahead.

In conclusion, you can see that this WikiProject helped me to regain my standing, alongside Chicdat, Nioni1234, Cristianpogi678, HurricaneTracker495 - and of course - CyclonicallyDeranged! If not for this WikiProject, I don't think they are will be here. Chicdat could have been CIR-blocked like Prahlad balaji and PythonSwarm, Nioni1234 and Cristianpogi678 ending up like Binbin0111 and Miggy72, HurricaneTracker495 would have a trouble establishing himself (or probably will never establish theirselves and stay as an IP) and CyclonicallyDeranged fully driven out from Wikipedia.

By the way, to me, both Binbin0111 and Miggy72 are young, but unfortunately they took on the wrong path (Binbin0111 was one of the earliest Force Thirteen insinuators - Binbin0111 is probably the impetus of Force Thirteen policy in this project (as it was made back in 2017), while Miggy72... we know what happened). I feel bad for them, especially Binbin0111. Had Binbin0111 is willing to learn and took steps forward to become productive young editor like Yellow Evan and two other resilient young editors I have mentioned did, Binbin0111 could have been one of the most valuable editors in this project, especially in matters related to Western Pacific basin, and in extension, Vietnam.

That's it. That's what I have to say. College is increasingly getting into my feelings right now, but I will do my best as I can coming into December. Sorry if I have a bad English. Thanks for reading this opinion piece!

Greetings from Indonesia,

SMB99thx my edits!

Disambiguation link notification for February 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of longest-running Philippine television series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TV5. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WPNTS![edit]

Please accept this invitation to join WikiProject Weather's Non-tropical storms task force (WPNTS), a task force dedicated to improving all articles associated with extratropical cyclones on Wikipedia. WPNTS hosts a number of Wikipedia's highly-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming winter season (for whichever hemisphere happens to be in its climatological winter). Simply click here and add your name to the list to accept!

HurricaneCovid (contribs) 00:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yaya and Angelina: The Spoiled Brat Movie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duchess of Wellington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Cyclone Gombe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 13:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. My fault, I was attempting to move it into an article and wrongly clicked on that one. Apologies. Vida0007 (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Santo Sepulcro" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Santo Sepulcro and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 12#Santo Sepulcro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 05:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tropical cyclones in 2022, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC islands.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meno (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Menon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Tropical Storm Nalgae obviously caused more serious damage than the other storms named Nalgae. Whether or not the name Nalgae will be retired is yet to be decided, but should the article title be changed to Tropical Storm Nalgae as a convention? 126.237.91.25 (talk) 17:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be better to wait until the damage estimates and the death toll become clearer; for now, the article's title should stay as "Tropical Storm Nalgae (2022)" . Vida0007 (talk) 18:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Aaron Carter[edit]

On 7 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Aaron Carter, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 04:15, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors[edit]

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. NoahTalk 03:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muscle car, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hypercar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus[edit]

Hello, Vida0007. You have new messages at Talk:Cerro Blanco (volcano).
Message added 09:17, 11 December 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:17, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Jovit Baldivino[edit]

On 13 December 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jovit Baldivino, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ks0stm (TCGE)  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  09:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swire (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Swire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scheduled for TFA[edit]

This is to let you know that the above articles have been scheduled as today's featured article for 2, 4 and 5 February 2023. Please check that the articles needs no amendments. Feel free to make comments on matters concerning the scheduling of these articles at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before rach appears on Main Page. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. All look good to me. Vida0007 (talk) 19:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

George Andrew Davis Jr. scheduled for TFA[edit]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 10 February 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 10, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:46, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thank you so much. Vida0007 (talk) 19:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious[edit]

suggesting featured articles

Thank you for quality articles such as Typhoon Nanmadol (2022), for lists of tropical storms by name, for suggesting featured articles and news items to appear on significant days, for page moves and reviewing the news, - Jas, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2812 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I feel honored to receive this prize. Vida0007 (talk) 10:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Roberto Ongpin[edit]

On 11 February 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Roberto Ongpin, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 06:13, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Christian Atsu[edit]

On 19 February 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Christian Atsu, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 04:07, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2023 disasters in Russia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to delete it. It seems that the lone article in that category (Naryan-Mar United Aviation Squadron Flight 1095/1096) has been deleted yesterday. Vida0007 (talk) 09:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz: Or maybe not. It looks like the 2022–2023 Russian mystery fires has since been added to the category. However, as I do not see the "contest this speedy deletion" button, I am instead writing this reply to inform you about this development.
Regards, Vida0007 (talk) 16:34, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, to be honest, not many empty category speedy deletion taggings (CSD C1) are "contested". Typically, if editors believe that an empty category shouldn't be deleted, they do what you did which is to assign an article to it so it is no longer empty. There are no legitimate reasons for keeping an empty category unless it falls under a limited list of exceptions: a category redirect, a WikiProject category that is at times empty, category disambiguation pages and categories being discussed at CFD. So, there is no good argument to make to keep an otherwise empty content category. Plus, if a category is deleted simply for being empty and it later is needed, it can be restored upon request or recreated. This is one of the few speedy deletion criterias where that is possible. But you found an appropriate article to put in this category so it's been untagged. Kind of an interesting article, too, I wonder when these fires will stop being called "mysteries" and instead will be identified as espionage or arson. Liz Read! Talk! 21:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. To be honest, I was unfamiliar with how speedy deletion works in empty categories, and thank you for giving me a very thorough and informative overview about it. As for the article itself, it really is interesting: these fires have been going on for almost a year now – the first anniversary of the first fire would be on the 22nd of this month – and yet, these remain unsolved (and these fires still happen, with the most recent one occurring just 2 days ago). Vida0007 (talk) 21:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect “Toni Fowler” has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 21 § “Toni Fowler” until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 28 May 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 28, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Moonbin[edit]

On 24 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Moonbin, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 05:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but no, there is nothing in WP:MOS that talks about that. Nothing is said about requiring a wikilink for royal children who do not have their own English Wikipedia articles in their parent's Wikipedia article.
I thought the norm is just to put it as plain text in the parent's article, like in the case of Prince François, the second son of Luxembourg's the heir apparent (with his wikilink redirecting to his father's article instead)? That is basically the same situation here: the wikilink to Princess Caroline Mathilde of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha just redirects to her father Charles Edward’s article (although that is because it was decided to be deleted and be converted into a redirect roughly three years ago). Vida0007 (talk) 01:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2023 Imola Formula 3 round for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Imola Formula 3 round is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Imola Formula 3 round until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 11:46, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lizzo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rizzo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

about redirected page 2023 China floods to Doksuri[edit]

I don't think it is appropriate to roughly classify the floods in China in 2023 as Dussuri, as there are many reasons for floods, and the residual storm in Dussuri is only a part of it, and there are other reasons, all of which are too much content added to Dussuri. Not very conducive to cross language linking,It seems that there is a complete Chinese entry, but there is no corresponding English entry, or the English entry has been redirected to Dussuri

They are like 2021 Henan floods, perhaps worth presenting the content separately Dallenwil (talk) 01:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I agree. While I was the one who redirected it to a sub-section of the Doksuri article, I just followed HurricaneEdgar’s lead (aka the one who initially made the move to redirect 2023 China floods to Typhoon Doksuri). I think it is time to remove the redirect and expand its contents. Doksuri is long gone but the floods are still ongoing; clearly this is no longer due to Doksuri (or its remnants). Vida0007 (talk) 02:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hotels disestablished in 2021 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:53, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. Please do not delete it, as it is not empty anymore; I have already updated the category and put The NoMad there. Vida0007 (talk) 15:08, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Max Verstappen[edit]

On 10 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Max Verstappen, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, you are the one that deserves it.[edit]

Articles for creation: Typhoon Haikui (2023) has been accepted ==

Typhoon Haikui (2023), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:26, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Although it was for me, I managed to track down the creator of the draft, and it was you. You are the one that really deserved it. Kudos to you! Nanchang17 (talk) 14:59, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate it. But thanks to you too, because you were the one who greatly expanded that article. Kudos to you as well! Vida0007 (talk) 16:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA nominee Cyclone Jasper[edit]

Could you please review Cyclone Jasper to determine if it should be nominated for a GA article? 🎩Incognito Fedora🎩 (talk) 16:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already went through the Cyclone Jasper article and I have to say that I am impressed with how it turned out. Relatively, it may be shorter than other tropical cyclone articles but I have to say that this one is well-detailed and well-cited. I think this is already good to be nominated for GA – the article's current state reminds me of some of the Western Pacific systems that received GA status – even if the article's topic is still considered to be active by Australia's Bureau of Meteorology. Vida0007 (talk) 05:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay Thanks for your opinion. 🎩Incognito Fedora🎩 (talk) 05:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Vida0007. Thank you for your work on 2024 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Hello as well! Happy New Year, and thank you for reviewing the article. Have a nice day! Vida0007 (talk) 10:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023–24 European windstorm season, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Intentional disambiguation link[edit]

Just a note to let you know that at Mid Bedfordshire (UK Parliament constituency) you deleted part of an intentional disambiguation link. There's an explanation at WP:INTDAB that explains this odd construction. They do serve a purpose, so please leave them alone if you see them. Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 20:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thank you for the heads up. Will not do it again.
Regards, Vida0007 (talk) 01:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicknames of San Francisco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City of Love.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

Precious
One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the late reply but I just want to say thanks! I appreciate this message so much. Vida0007 (talk) 06:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thankyou for correcting my error that the Rochdale and Kingswood by-elections were taking place the same Thursday. My mind was too full of this week's media hoo-ha about the suspension of the Rochdale Labour candidate which created the impression in me of an upcoming shambolic by-election this week. Now I know that things have more time to calm down over there as Harold Wilson said, "A week is a long time in politics" and voters have more time to decide their choices.Cloptonson (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. We're human after all, we make mistakes from time to time. I agree with you though: the media frenzy surrounding the (former?) Labour candidate for Rochdale made it seem that the by-election for that constituency will also occur on the same day as the ones for Kingswood and Wellingborough. Vida0007 (talk) 06:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nieto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Nieto.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BINI image on their infobox[edit]

Is it possible to put back their BINI logo jpg since their other image got deleted? 120.28.249.38 (talk) 12:23, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that could be allowed, as long as it does not violate any copyright(s). Vida0007 (talk) 14:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
what the name of the file? Maybe i can put the logo back on their infobox if its still available. 120.28.249.38 (talk) 01:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]