User talk:Biographyinfo

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Biographyinfo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! PeterSymonds (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:Vanbrugh.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vanbrugh.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Cocksworth[edit]

Please not that Christopher Cocksworth has not yet been consecrated as a bishop, therefore he is not yet a Right Revd. The consecration is scheduled for 3/7. David Underdown (talk) 14:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Jay of Ewelme[edit]

Thanks for adding the Styles section to the article. It would be even better with dates and references! He apparently received the GCMG in 2006 [1] and according to the New Year Honours 1997, he received the KCMG in 1997, and was indeed already a CMG - however, you should look up the relevent page in the London Gazette to confirm this. You can also look back to find out when he was made a CMG. It's much better if you can research all the information, rather than adding it with question marks (and guessing that he was a CMG). One hint when searching for this kind of information is to Google full names, Michael Hastings Jay, as that's only used in official lists such as honours announcements. JRawle (Talk) 14:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice work! JRawle (Talk) 23:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peerages, Baronetcies and Knighthoods[edit]

Please note that on Wikipedia we do not add lower peerage titles that have been superseded by higher ones inline. Nor do we add baronetcies if the individual also holds a peerage or knighthoods if he holds a baronetcy or peerage. These can be described in the body of the article, but not listed inline. Thanks. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of New Year Honours 2009[edit]

I have nominated New Year Honours 2009, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Year Honours 2009. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mayalld (talk) 16:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Margaret Ford, Baroness Ford"[edit]

A page you created, Margaret Ford, Baroness Ford, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Miquonranger03 (talk) 18:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Warwickshirepct.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Warwickshirepct.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Mandelson?[edit]

Out of interst, what is your source for him taking the title Baron Mandelson, of Hendon in the City of London, seeing as it hasn't been gazetted yet? JRawle (Talk) 23:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time for resolution[edit]

Hiya. For several months now, the article naming for 18th Century British royals has been ever-which-where — all over the shop. In an attempt to solve this, I have prepared a page for discussion: here. Please, please, please come and discuss, even contribute to the Poll. Cheers! D B D 15:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alick Buchanan-Smith, Baron Balerno[edit]

A tag has been placed on Alick Buchanan-Smith, Baron Balerno requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fullstop (talk) 19:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Biographyinfo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Francis Brand, 7th Viscount Hampden - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jane Williams, Baroness Williams of Elvel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:26, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vanbrugh.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vanbrugh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 16:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jane Williams, Baroness Williams of Elvel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jane Williams, Baroness Williams of Elvel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Williams, Baroness Williams of Elvel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk 19:02, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jane Williams, Baroness Williams of Elvel[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jane Williams, Baroness Williams of Elvel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk 16:53, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of United Agents for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Agents is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Agents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Queen's Counsel has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Queen's Counsel has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Warwickshire Primary Care Trust for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warwickshire Primary Care Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warwickshire Primary Care Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Elshad (talk) 17:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]