User talk:Starcluster
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Open Cluster Families, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.univie.ac.at/webda/scyon/Marcos.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 25[edit]
Hi. When you recently edited 2002 VE68, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 16[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited (164207) 2004 GU9, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socorro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 23[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited (15810) 1994 JR1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:57, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 13[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited (310071) 2010 KR59, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WISE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Suzanne W. Tourtellotte[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Suzanne W. Tourtellotte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ubelowme U Me 18:09, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- FYI, you may find Wikipedia:Notability (academics) to be useful in the context. If you have questions, feel free to leave me a note. Ubelowme U Me 18:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Suzanne W. Tourtellotte for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suzanne W. Tourtellotte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne W. Tourtellotte until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:35, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating 2010 EU65, Starcluster!
Wikipedia editor Rarkenin just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice addition, but I'd make sure to expand it as new details about it are known. Keep up the good work! Rarkenin (talk) 20:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment on Rarkenin's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Disambiguation link notification for May 20[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- James V. Scotti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Eccentricity
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
coauthors is deprecated[edit]
Within the {{cite}} template please note that the |coauthors= parameter is deprecated.
It is recommended to use |first2= |last2= |first3= |last3= instead and there is no longer a limit to the number of first and last names that can be listed. -- 212.139.104.181 (talk) 19:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Open cluster remnant[edit]
Hi, given that you created the article Open cluster remnant (good job by the way) I was wondering if you could perhaps edit the sources used as inline citations in the text so that they are easier to associate with what each one is actually referencing. Please feel free to ask me should you have any questions about the process, if you decide to do it that is. Regards. Gaba (talk) 14:32, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Citation Spam[edit]
I notice that you've been inserting references by a particular researcher/research group (including a self-published book of theirs on Kindle) in a very large number of articles involving small bodies and impact events. Some of them are references and some are "Further Reading". This is spam, and it's against the rules. Please don't do that. Geogene (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Starcluster. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Starcluster. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Starcluster. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 9[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited C/2018 V1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eccentricity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you![edit]
|
For your contribution to 2I/Borisov. Thank you very much!
Hashar (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For your contributions to near-Earth asteroid articles. Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 23:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC) |
Thank you, I appreciate it.
Speedy deletion nomination of Minor Planet Mailing List[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Minor Planet Mailing List, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --- Possibly (talk) 00:37, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Reply[edit]
Wikipedia is not FaceBook, you can't just post anything you like. You must follow the guidance below:
- you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Your only ref is written by the group's administrator, who is not an independent third party source, and there is absolutely nothing to indicate how this group meets the notability criteria, it appears to be just another of thousands of on-line forums, and the worthiness of its aims doesn't change that.
- You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews, such as ' a lively hub... discovered numerous asteroids and comets. Even if the latter is true, sourcing it to his own writing makes it worthless
- There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
- You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
You said Not allowing at least 24 hours to contest a speedy deletion is, in my opinion, a mistake. The point of a speedy deletion is that there is no requirement for discussion. The editor who nominated this for deletion and I were both presented with a page that had no independent references, no evidence at all for notability and a promotional tone. However worthwhile you may thing the group is, that's no reason for us to host promo for it here.
Completely unrelated, but Groups.io leads to a disambiguation page for the moon and the lover of Zeus
Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources.
Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:56, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Ways to improve The Planetary Science Journal[edit]
Hello, Starcluster,
Thank you for creating The Planetary Science Journal.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please review WP:NJOURNALS.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FormalDude}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
––FormalDude talk 02:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Minor edits[edit]
Hello Starcluster,
I reverted two of your edits (1, 2), asking to "not mark edits as "minor" when they in fact are not". I am sure you were only trying to change the spelling from British to American English, which is usually considered a minor edit, and would be acceptable almost everywhere within the two articles. The problem is that the changes were about the title of a published work within a reference; and it is usually best to keep the original spelling in such cases. Best regards, Renerpho (talk) 23:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your concern. However, manuscripts submitted to peer review journals get their titles (and content) altered both during the review process itself and later, during the copy-editing phase, when the publisher applies the language conventions used by the journal before getting the paper in its final form. A paper can be pre-published (right after acceptance) with one spelling and get the spelling changed by the publisher later. In this particular case, I was merely trying to reflect this fact. Starcluster (talk) 16:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- I see. You are right, the arxiv version, for example, uses the other spelling. I have no objections against changing it to scrutinized under those circumstances. Go ahead and undo my recent edits on those articles if you want. Your edit summary "Fix title" didn't explain the issue very clearly; I suggest to be a bit more "verbose" next time. Renerpho (talk) 20:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Reference fully updated with official data:
- Distant trans-Neptunian object candidates from NASA’s TESS mission scrutinized: fainter than predicted or false positives?
- https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article-abstract/513/1/L78/6565292 Starcluster (talk) 06:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- I see. You are right, the arxiv version, for example, uses the other spelling. I have no objections against changing it to scrutinized under those circumstances. Go ahead and undo my recent edits on those articles if you want. Your edit summary "Fix title" didn't explain the issue very clearly; I suggest to be a bit more "verbose" next time. Renerpho (talk) 20:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
WD 0810-353 moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, WD 0810-353, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 13:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, I had a technical issue during editing and I could not go back to fix it before the article was identified as problematic. The current version should be OK for publishing to mainspace, at least in my opinion.Starcluster (talk) 17:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: WD 0810-353 has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Great work on 2023 DZ2!! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC) |
Thanks. Its impact probability went up after follow-up observations.
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)