User talk:TVHead/Archive:2007/1/

Fox News Channel logo[edit]

I wanted to ask, where exactly did you find this version of the FNC logo? Chris (Talk) (Contribs) 01:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, just wanted to ask since the "C" is not usually capitalized in their copied of the logo Chris (Talk) (Contribs) 01:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Letterman[edit]

What vandalism? David Letterman is indeed an American liberal. It's evident to anyone who has ever watched his show. There is nothing at all incorrect about the categorization. -- HowardDean 10:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Podcasting[edit]

I've noticed that you are a podcaster. Well, recently I've proposed a Wikiproject for podcasting. If you're interested go to the proposal page and list yourself under 'Interested Users'. Thanks, and hope to talk with you again soon. Gan fon 19:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Podcasting Started[edit]

The project is now under way. If you'd like to join, feel free to add your name to the members list on the project page. Thanks, and I hope that you'll be joing us soon. Gan fon 21:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can[edit]

The article Attack of the Show!, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the nobots template on your user talk page

Interested in why you felt it necessary to revert my edit on Keith's bio. He's not a "news anchor." He's a commentator and a sportscaster, but not a news anchor. What was the problem with removing it from his description? K. Scott Bailey 10:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bio Channel.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bio Channel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BJBot 08:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What the fuck is your problem?[edit]

I just got through a similar content dispute with another fuckwit that stared deleting valid, substantiated content from Toni Pearen. Okay, let's hear it. What's your golden reason for this blatant error? 203.59.51.234 11:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ONE OF US, ONE OF US, ONE OF US, ONE OF US--203.70.92.95 15:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MyWay[edit]

It appears that MyWay is conducting a public relations campaign to rid Wikipedia of references to MyWay being spyware. Every time me and other editors provide accurate research on MyWay, we are told by Bercyon simply that our research is wrong, even though it is heavily cited. The account kirk_lawrence appears more reasonable, but both of their strategies center around casting doubt over whether MyWay is spyware (it's actually a lot like how creationists attempt to cast doubt over whether there's scientific consensus over evolution, but that's a different issue for a different day). Today, Bercyon has shifted his strategy to more personal attacks, while Kirk_lawrence is appearing more reasonable. I have yet to fully analyze why Kirk shifted his strategy, but my hypothesis that he thinks that by appearing more trusting and legitimate he can convince me and the other editors that MyWay isn't spyware. Me and Alan Rockefeller are keeping an eye on the MyWay pages. Can you aid us and notify an admin of the situation? If you want more evidence, look at their contributions and the talk pages/histories of the MyWay pages. In fact, Kirk_lawrence's user page used to be completely dedicated to MyWay. SteveSims 09:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mike / Steve. I'm quite a novice when it comes to Wiki, but I'm learning fast. My motives are the protection of my user base who gets upset when they hear that the software/site that they use, is being called "Spyware". In my role as head of Customer Support here for IAC Search and Media's web properties, I get to hear their displeasure first hand. "Spyware" is a very strong and damaging accusation amd certainly one we absolutely contest. I have every intention of resolving this amicably -- but it's not something that going to be done on Wiki pages. Is there such a thing as a dispute resolution process for Wiki? My requests for Steve to get in touch have not been successful to date. Please email me the response. Thanks.

Kirk_lawrence 19:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

Your recent edit to Foxtel was reverted. At no time in the Fox Business Channel article does it say anything about its appearance on Foxtel. Please realise that just because Foxtel's parent company is making a new channel in the US, it does not necessarily mean that it will be available on Foxtel in Australia.

Please do not add information to articles without a (reliable) source.

Chrisch 04:47, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Found a better source [1] and that does say it is coming to Foxtel. - Mike Beckham 05:34, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response[edit]

"but its maybe not the best idea to take that tone to long term editors who have been here a tad longer than yourself."

I take the same tone to any editor, from new IP editor, to long term editors that do not quote their sources when editing an encyclopedia. Perhaps you should not take that tone... you have only been here 5 months longer than I have, and although you have spent much more of your time editing, it does not place you at a higher rank, or excuse you from warnings :)

Please remember to quote your sources when adding new information to articles, otherwise you will be asked for them again.

Good day.

Chrisch 05:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Template:Subscription_television_channels_in_Australia[edit]

I didn't readd the FTA channels. If you look properly you will see 121.45.34.175 did.

Reubot 11:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheLabLogo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TheLabLogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cityhomicidecast.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cityhomicidecast.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Kerri Anne Kennerley.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Kerri Anne Kennerley.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 09:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bio Channel.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bio Channel.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: The Big Story; The Herald and Weekly Times Ltd; List of hospitals in Australia; Steve Abbott; Grant Bowler; Mazda B-Series; Hallmark Movie Channel; Point Lonsdale, Victoria; Rove Live Radio; Sports Tonight; Indented Head, Victoria; Chris Knowles; Channel 2 (Iran); Chi-Lan Lieu; Paul Mercurio; ABC News; Access 31; Fishcam; 3AW

Cleanup: Ansett Australia; Yoshi DeHerrera; Court TV
Merge: Transperth Second Generation A-series train; Cheaters; Gizmo5
Add Sources: Logie Awards of 1991; Hannity & Colmes; Melissa Doyle
Wikify: Craig Hutchison; Primary channel; Internet Fibre Channel Protocol
Expand: KFC; Boston Market; Dan Huard

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Fox Classics[edit]

fX existed before FX

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FX_%28TV_network%29#Australia

Reubot (talk) 03:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Today (Australian TV program)[edit]

Hi, I see you have been editing the article Today. I am unsure whether you are aware that I have placed this up for Peer Review? I would appreciate it, if you would kindly give your own review, suggestions or perhaps opinions on the article's quality and its suitablity as a FA or GA. Please go to the article's discussion page, click on the link to the review page, and leave your thoughts. Thanks --Tjkirk (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

fx[edit]

Ok then, I'll make a new article, but you didn't need to remove the correct information I had added. Reubot 02:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did if you read what I wrote in my edits. These included the dates of the switchover from fox kids (including citations) and the old logo from the fox kids era. Reubot (talk) 14:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your removal from the "American Morning News Shows"[edit]

Yes, RFD-TV IS nationally available on both major nationwide satellite providers in the U.S. and on several cable providers, with many more to come, contrary to your claim; its coverage is comparable to the Fox Business Network, which is already listed, the noteworthiness of the program itself notwithstanding. JMyrleFuller (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sky News Business.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sky News Business.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Robert Fidgeon.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Robert Fidgeon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Leith_Mulligan.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Leith_Mulligan.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 23:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

re: December 2007[edit]

Do not leave leave messages on my talk page telling me to "specify a reason in the edit summary" when I clearly did. — Steven Andrew Miller (talk) 10:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nine Network 2008.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nine Network 2008.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Hallmark Movie Channel; Access 31; TV Miyazaki; Steve Abbott; The Big Story; The Extra; Sports Tonight; Johanna Griggs; Brigitte Quinn; ABC News; Fox Footy Channel; Strong agnosticism; Chi-Lan Lieu; Indus News; Catherine Crier; The Herald and Weekly Times Ltd; HD News; AusIRC; Channel 2 (Iran)

Cleanup: CNBC-e; More4 News; Religiosity
Merge: Thebroken; Statistical multiplexer; Cheaters
Add Sources: Melissa Doyle; Indented Head, Victoria; CNN International
Wikify: List of digital television deployments by country; Craig Hutchison; Primary channel
Expand: Yoshi DeHerrera; Showtime Arabia; List of television stations in Maine (by channel number)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Robert Fidgeon.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Robert Fidgeon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Today Logo Australia.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Today Logo Australia.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Midnight spank.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Midnight spank.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:K rockgeelong.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:K rockgeelong.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KPHX.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:KPHX.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Reporting breach of 3RR rule[edit]

Hi there I noticed your report at WP:AIV as follows:

AMittelman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - On United States presidential election, 2008 (diff);. Breaking 3RR. - Mike Beckham (talk) 06:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note breaches of 3RR should be reported here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR.--VS ^talk 06:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bio Channel.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bio Channel.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:David Kim.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:David Kim.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NrDg 04:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]