User talk:SrMeI

This is my talk page.

Running for adminship.

HI SrMeI - thank you, yes I'd be up for running for adminship, thanks for offering to nominate me! I actually did run for it a few years ago, but missed out as I basically wasn't ready, and was mainly writing... but I'm doing afd now and I'm actually involved in running edit-a-thons in Real Life, and there have been situations where it would have come in handy for that. So yep, thank you! Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

• SrMeI I have decided not to run for adminship for the moment, I just got some advice it would most likely not get through. However, I did get some tips on ways of improving how I do some of my wiki work, which will help me when I do give it a shot. Mainly wanted to say THANK YOU for your kind words. Cheers! Deathlibrarian (talk) 13:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Carriker (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matt Carriker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 01:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello! SrMeI, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 01:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Carriker (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matt Carriker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 02:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

@BU Rob13: User:BernardSandoval? — fortunavelut luna(Currently not receiving pings, sorry) 14:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Not sure you meant to link to that editor? I can see no behavioral relation. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

This account created Draft:Matt Carriker, whilst the one I linked to created (the now deleted) Matt Carriker? — fortunavelut luna(Currently not receiving (most) pings, sorry) 14:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Ah. Well, behaviorally maybe, but BernardSandoval is  Stale so there's no technical data to go on. The CU evidence the block is based upon is unrelated to BernardSandoval. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Carriker (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matt Carriker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 22:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)