User talk:Papivanlenra0435

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, AMFMmusicreview, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 10:21, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Papivanlenra0435 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

AMFMmscrvw (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

I agree with the comment by Fuhghettaboutit below. Besides, there's the issue of your unduly promotional edits which you haven't addressed. Huon (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you've made the promotional aspect of the prior name slightly more hidden in the requested change of name by disemvoweling is not even close to meeting our requirement that you have a non-promotional username.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:05, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Papivanlenra0435 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

needaname (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

This user name is already taken. Please also answer the questions below. Diannaa (talk) 23:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Diannaa (talk) 23:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-un|papivanlenra0435}}

Yes, understood. thank you

More detail is required in response to the questions. PhilKnight (talk) 18:12, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to PhilKnight:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?

Yes, I do understand this, very clear, and i appreciate wikipedia as an encyclopedia

Do you understand conflict of interest?

Absolutely understood, i wish to avoid conflicts of interest. I would appreciate advice and input rather than being blocked, I wish to make edits and be given feedback, rather than being shut off.

Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

In the spirit of Wikipedia's nature of collaboration, i wish to take your feedback and make necessary changes to articles instead of being blocked out.

I wrote this article as a "Draft" and not as an official submission, the purpose of this was to hear feedback and make changes as needed, honestly i'm surprised to be blocked like this when i believed i was taking the normal route of creating articles.

regarding notability,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music) Criteria for musicians and ensembles: A musician or ensemble may be notable if it meets at least one of the following criteria:

12. Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.

the subject meets this standard and should be considered for notability.

my original username "AMFMmusicreview" was essentially chosen at random as a name was needed and i knew i would be contributing about music, for some reason this name has been blocked, this name is not a company name or a promotional name, but just a name that seemed to sound good. i'm more than happy to change it and i've made attempts to do so.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Celestial Ceiling (April 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oo7565 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Celestial Ceiling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oo7565 (talk) 00:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Oo7565 (talk) 00:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Papivanlenra0435 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

papivanlenra0435 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. PhilKnight (talk) 18:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Hi, I didn't understand the rules when i made my username before, i'd like to change it to the one i just listed above, Thanks so much!}}

Problems with upload of File:Celestial Ceiling playing drums.tiff[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Celestial Ceiling playing drums.tiff. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Papivanlenra0435 (talk) 14:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Copyright data added, thank youPapivanlenra0435 (talk) 14:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Celestial Ceiling (April 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Celestial Ceiling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 13:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Celestial Ceiling (July 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aerospeed was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Celestial Ceiling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aerospeed (Talk) 21:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Papivanlenra0435, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aerospeed (Talk) 21:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Celestial Ceiling concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Celestial Ceiling, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Celestial Ceiling[edit]

Hello, Papivanlenra0435. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Celestial Ceiling".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]