User talk:ZordZapper

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZordZapper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An extreme case of mistaken identity

Decline reason:

Not at all... sockpuppetry and vandalism are surefire ways to get banned. — Jmlk 1 7 18:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

True, but all I want is for someone else to handle this. His actions are too extreme. I hope there are not too many editors like him. I see those other users had a disdain for the Power Rangers, too.

I'm willing to be adopted if I am unblocked. ZordZapper 08:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZordZapper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit the first few edits I made were questionable. However, I did not receive one warning. The user who blocked me had a "don't you mess with me" attitude that does things out of fear he'll be bothered. I am asking for a neutral admin to handle this. After looking through his history, I noticed a similar incident were he blocked an unused anti-Power Ranger name and other admins soundly disapproved of it.

Decline reason:

If a trusted user offers to adopt you, I would be willing to consider it. However, I am denying this request until such a time. Please repost your unblock request if you receive an offer for adoption. — Pastordavid 21:12, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See this link [1] for details. ZordZapper 11:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[2] Just as I suspected, his "hunch" led him to cross reference me to User:CBDrunkerson. ZordZapper 02:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I could comment, you seem to be awfully knowledgeable of Wikipedia policy for a new user. You are looking at page histories, properly wikilinking, know enough to complain that you weren't warned beforehand, and even know about how Ryulong goes about his blocks. While Ryulong certainly has a problem with too quick a trigger finger, he's also usually right when it comes to sockpuppets. Are you honestly saying you've never edited here before? The Evil Spartan 17:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have with IPs, but because many of them are shared, they get blocked. It's also possible to watch the site for a long time without editing. You agree that RL has a quick trigger finger. I think it's dangerous for someone to be impulsive when handling these situations. I feel inclined to make a new account but I also don't want to waste time so I'm trying to salvage this one. ZordZapper 19:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hang On[edit]

Let me check a couple of things and get back to you. Pastordavid 16:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you asked RL. Let's see if he has a change of heart, since I have no intention of bothering him. I fear he might go out of his way to convince you that he was right. ZordZapper 19:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I checked in also. I think adoption is a good idea and I'm glad you're willing to take the step. Let's make sure someone is willing to adopt you first, though. Why don't you add {{subst:dated adoptme}} to this page, as a start? The trouble I see is that your edits so far suggest a fundamental misunderstanding of what an Encyclopedia is, and show a lack of seriousness. But hopefully someone will be nice and offer to help anyway. Mango juice^talk 20:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see that I'm getting somewhere. I will put myself up for adoption. ZordZapper 22:48, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno...I'm personally willing to give another chance, but am giving another admin the right(s) to unblock, since I declined above. In the end, it isn't my decision anymore. Jmlk 1 7 08:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked[edit]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): User adopted by an experienced editor. Request handled by: Pastordavid 14:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been unblocked as we talked about above, as The Rhymesmith has agreed to adopt you. Please talk with The Rhymesmith about how to get started at being a productive editor here, and stay in conversation about whether or not you are doing so. Be aware that this is a second chance, and you need to edit appropriately. This message, and your previous block, function as your warnings - unacceptable behavior will lead to blocking. Best of luck to you, and happy editing. Pastordavid 14:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]