User talk:Zantets

Image tagging for Image:Metalheroes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Metalheroes.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your sources for "controversy" section of Zaido: Pulis Pangkalawakan

All the links and references for the "Criticism" section that you provided are blogs (mikeabundo.com and royalflare.wordpress.com), which under Wikipedia's policies are invalid references (Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:External links). That makes the whole section look like an original research. Unless you provide a reliable reference (like an article from the PEP; not a forum link, a news article from a newspaper or a press release from GMA or any other network) then the section should be removed.

Also try to read this (Talk:Super Twins/Archive 1). This is an archive of the talk page of Super Twins in which an editor is persistent to add a "Controversy" section where his provided sources are just blogs and discussion boards. - Danngarcia 12:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why did you re-add those references? I already told you that those references are invalid per WP:Verifiability. Unless you provide a MORE reliable sources other than personal blogs, the controversy section must be removed ASAP. -Danngarcia 14:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

personal attack

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I am not a fan of this program but you are violating the policies of Wikipedia in citing references. Please read the policies first before you complain. -Danngarcia 16:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Danngarcia 16:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BAH! Good luck on your wikipedia career anyway, regards Zantets (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing

You need to seriously consider your editing pattern here. Edit warring on articles is always wrong, and this edit could have earned you a block on its own. Further tendentious editing will earn a block. Thanks, ELIMINATORJR 16:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zaido

Stop edit warring there or you will face a block.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeatedly adding material, sourced with unreliable sources, despite warnings and personal attacks.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Nishkid64 (talk) 04:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

National Transmission Corporation

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of National Transmission Corporation, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.transco.ph/whoweare.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TransCo logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TransCo logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TransCo logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TransCo logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Belt-cp

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Belt-cp, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? – ThatWikiGuy (talk|I feel like I'm being watched) 11:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Belt-cp

A tag has been placed on Belt-cp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. HtD (talk) 11:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of BELTCP

A tag has been placed on BELTCP, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. HtD (talk) 12:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as BELTCP, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not advertise on Wikipedia. You will be blocke dif you continue to add inappropriate content. HtD (talk) 12:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TransCo logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TransCo logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Your recent editing history at List of fake news websites shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. feminist (talk) 16:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]