User talk:Zanebeast60202

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Michael Jackson, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion _(talk) 03:01, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Tay Zonday. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 03:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Tay Zonday. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 03:05, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Chamal N, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion _(talk) 03:10, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:43, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

If you are interested in participating constructively in writing a free encyclopedia, you may wish to concern yourself with productive contributions, rather than complaining when you are warned for vandalism. This is a wiki, anyone may participate or answer on another editor's page, providing their contributions are constructive. You may wish to alter your approach to editing on Wikipedia. Acroterion _(talk) 03:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't block people like that, but you don't appear to understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to edit as you please without examination of your work. You might want to take a break and come back in a couple of years when you understand how to research and edit articles appropriately. Acroterion _(talk) 03:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zanebeast60202, you have vandalized twice more since you were warned. The edits were to Ha-ha and Arterial road, both with misleading edit summaries actually adding spelling errors to the article. I still don't see any constructive edits in your contributions, so I suggest you follow Acroterion's advice. Consider this a final warning; if you continue to vandalize you will be blocked. ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 04:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Wikipedia talk:Vandalism. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 20:03, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion _(talk) 20:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Zanebeast60202 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

98.223.114.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

[[WP:Vandalism-only account|Vandalism-only account]]

Blocking administrator: Acroterion (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I see know reason why I was blocked. Yes I vandalized at the beginning but then I stopped. There is no reason why I should be blocked.

In fact, you have not vandalised since you were blocked. (!!!). So what is your point? --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:46, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zanebeast60202 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see no reason why I should be blocked. Yes I admit I vandalized at the beginning, but I haven't vandalized since then.

Decline reason:

As I said above, you vandalised until you were blocked. you have given no reason for us to assume that your behaviour would change if unblocked. Your reason for your making vandal edits, together with a reason for stopping, would be a good start. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:49, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zanebeast60202 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't vandalized that much, I just made corrections by mistake. This is the first time I have used Wikipedia to edit, and I think I understand what the edit guide lines are now. Is their way to assign someone to watch my account to make sure I don't vandalize? I would be happy with that. I think I was judged unfairly. I promise that I won't vandalize again! Please give me this one chance!

Decline reason:

All of your edits have been vandalism. You had 'one chance;' in fact, you had eight chances to stop- that's how many warnings to stop I count on your talk page. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:47, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.