User talk:Zandarx

I've created this talk page for honest feedback on any issue you have with my editing style. I will only respond to constructive criticism. Feel free to add headings if they are needed.

Feedback

I just noticed that my original changes for the Narfell Persistent World were being changed not only by former staff to discredit my work, but also by you. The gameworld was built single-handed by me for several months before anyone became involved, thus why I am the rightful creator of said work, and why I add such a comment to the article. I recently left the gameworld due to several reasons, and unhappy former staff continually revert the entry back. The original material was taken from the D&D history and most current material was created by myself, including landscape and NPC changes to the enviroment.

Two points:

- The NWN module that was entered into the Narfell article is pretty much against Wikipedia policy and should truely be removed. The fact that it has not been flagged for removal is because it does generate a moderate ranking on Alexa (+1,000,000) making it BARELY notable. The fact that it is not an offical campaign for Forgotten Realms also amplifies its violation.
- Unless you have evidence that you are the sole developer to this module, and you are able to cite these sources (based on the policies). Then you are allowed to include your REAL NAME as the developer--Zandarx ^talk 19:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will be coping this to your talk page as well

That's fine. I have builds of the module that date back years bearing my name as creator, as well as links that bear the world with my name listed as creator, such as at the Neverwinter Vault - http://nwvault.ign.com/View.php?view=Gameworld.Detail&id=392. Would that suffice?

I hope this is the appropriate way to contact you. I'd like to defend my Mechwarrior 4: Mercenaries article. The game is significant, the series is a ground-breaking simulation action game, and there is a real culture attached to it. I am a new editor, but I've been doing my background reading. Therefore I hope it is reasonable to state that I may be 'mergist' in my leanings. Perhaps I could re-merge this page back into the Mechwarrior 4: Mercenaries page I developed from stub. The main reason I linked it instead of leaving it there is that the page is already far too long. Is there any other way to shorten pages - perhaps shunt the terms etc onto a 'rear' or second page? I can't seem to find a way to do this...

On a related deletionist agenda, could you kindly give your opinion of this page please: Cyrus_Farivar. I believe vanity pages are a problem for WP, and this one needs to go. I'm guessing some kind of tactics are being used to stop it being deleted. I have already asked for comment on the talk page. Centrepull 16:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. Just discovered glossaries section! I'll be moving all the MW4 terms and definitions stuff across. Centrepull 20:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, im putting this here because i dont know how to contact you, but i just wanted to say nice job on deleting my article (Smelly mongolains) Im not complaining it was dumb, you caught it fast im impressed, anywhow...my bad. --Sultangris 08:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

About Vietnam Refugees in New Zealand, it was copy/pasted off this site, so I deleted it.

Ok, but a two word article does not comply with the policies of Wikipedia--Zandarx ^talk

You forgot to sign your support of the deletion of Kelpie Collie on the AfD page. skorpion 00:14, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks --Zandarx ^talk 00:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandals/Attacks

This is a listing of all the users who have sent personal attacks, or defaced my userpage/talk page:

01sbrightwell June 8 & 11, 2006