User talk:Yusuf.Abdullah

Stupid shit

Here: [People descending from snakes http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Exotic_tribes_of_ancient_India&action=historysubmit&diff=314904542&oldid=310910728]

Refactoring talk page comments

Do not do so, as you did here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. Doing so is strictly prohibited. Continue to do so, and you may be blocked from editing. This is your final warning, as I see you have been warned before, but chose to do so again anyway.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 00:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tadiandamol

Pls see this article- Tadiandamol....This is a peak in Kodagu, Karnataka......The name of the peak has malayalam origin....So pls check out the etymology of the name..... ARUNKUMAR P.R (talk · contribs) 04:54, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VDL

Love Jihad

Your edits under Love Jihad was not worth keeping as it violated a number of core WP policies - a section named "Modus Operandi" was linked to a single primary source(ie, http://thatsmalayalam.oneindia.in/news/2009/10/16/love-jihad-kcbc-social-harmony-father-johney-kochuparambil.pdf), that too in Malayalam, not in English!. Another section titled "Similar incidents" contained incidents of "forced conversion" which do not belong there as you cannot synthesise that these have anthing to do with alleged "Love Jihad" activity in South India. There are several controversial conversions to all religions incl. Islam - you cannot sythesise information as per your convenience. Also WP is not a soapbox or a forum for propaganda purpose by Bishop's Council or anything. Edits like these are not appropriate Please do not bring non English sources, even in talk pages - if you want to add a sentence, please look for a source in English linked to a reliable source. Hope you will be careful to read the core policies before you make changes to the above article. Thanks much Zencv^{Lets discuss} 22:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to add non-English, unreferenced materials to talk page, you may be barred from editing Zencv^Whisper 13:36, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead. Do you think this is Taliban owned website? People like you bring shame up on real Muslims like me. Islam is the religion of peace. Fanaticism has no place in Islam. Yusuf.Abdullah (talk) 14:12, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the fifth time you are adding improperly cited contents into the mentioned article. You have not been willing to explain your edits in talk page, rather reverting it again and again without any explanation. Reasons why your edits are not OK have been clearly mentioned in the talk page of the article and also here in your userpage. Please stop this and if you continue doing this, you may be banned from editing altogether by an administrator. Zencv^Whisper 16:50, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yusuf.Abdullah for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Zencv^{Lets discuss} 13:13, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Yusuf.Abdullah. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yusuf.Abdullah.
Message added 05:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NW (Talk) 05:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Love Jihad. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nja²⁴⁷ 10:16, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yusuf.Abdullah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am simply shocked to hear this. All I was doing was to prevent page blanking done by the accuser Zencv in the article Love Jihad. Details can be found here:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yusuf.Abdullah, the talk page of Love Jihad and the accuser's own talk page. It s surprising that the admins chose to ban me, even with no prior 3RR warnings to my name on the advise of an user who has got close to 3 dozen 3RR warnings so far. I request the admins to look in to the edits made in the article mentioned above and ban the vandal Zencv from further editing. Please see the talk page of the accuser, as it is clear that he has been accused of vandalism, page blanking and edits supporting Jihadi/extremist organizations. Please prevent the mental harassment and buyying by revoking the ban of someone like me, who has contributed to the wikipedia by rectifying vandalized articles.

Decline reason:

You were clearly warned at the sockpuppet investigation not to engage in edit warring, and you did anyway. You are not banned, just blocked for one day, I suggest you do something else with this time and come back tomorrow refreshed and clear headed, and don't engage in further edit warring. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:14, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|It can be seen that I haven't made any edits to Love Jihad after being warned by the Admins about the edit war. Only the accuser has made any edits, even though he was also warned similarly.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Contrary to what Beeblebrox said, the user was not warned, and the user didn't 3RR after he/she was warned. Sorry but we do have to warn someone prior to them getting blocked. Please don't continue to revert on this article Yusuf.

Request handled by: Coffee // have a cup // ark // 06:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Sockpuppetry case

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yusuf.Abdullah. Thank you. Sole Soul (talk) 07:48, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

talk page

Please discuss the issue in talk page Talk:Love Jihad, instead of reverting the article edits. Reach a compromise mid way. Regards, Porsched sgools (talk) 15:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have been calling me offensive names atleast 3 times as I am aware of here, here and here. Your incivility and inappropriate behaviour have exceeded all the limits and if you continue name calling such as "Jihadi", "Islamic extremist" etc., you may be banned altogether from WP by an admin., as your conduct is not conducive to a harmonious atmosphere here. Zencv^Whisper 16:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notification

Hi, Yusuf.Abdullah. This is a friendly note to remind you that when you begin an WP:ANI thread regarding another editor you must inform them of the thread. I have done so, but you may want to keep it in mind for the next time. Thanks! Basket of Puppies 01:48, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

pointy disruption

Be advised that actually carrying through with this threat would be a disruption of Wikipedia to make a point. I understand you feel hurt, but it's probably time to drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. Focus on the issues, not the person. tedder (talk) 02:36, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Give me suggestions

Hi,

Currently I am working on this template about Renaissance of Kerala. Could you pls provide me some suggestions (which articles should be included) on sections Background, Events & Leaders and Others on my talk page here User_talk:Rameez_pp?

Cheer (Rameez pp (talk) 12:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mtramex.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mtramex.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:29, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Itasseri Nair

The article Itasseri Nair has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Nothing but mirrors appear to exist for this alleged community.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 04:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of M. T. Ramesh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. T. Ramesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. T. Ramesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 10:49, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of K. P. Rajagopal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K. P. Rajagopal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. P. Rajagopal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 08:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]