User talk:Yogidreamss

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Go Daddy do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Lone boatman (talk) 15:34, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Go Daddy. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Lone boatman (talk) 15:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Go Daddy and CAPTCHA. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lone boatman (talk) 14:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani Official Trailer.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani Official Trailer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Go Goa Gone, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —Psychonaut (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text

{{unblock|reason=After reading all the wiki guidelines, i realized that i did wrong to put external reference links directly into the content section. I promise, it would never happen again. In future, i will take care about such issues since i'm a genuine wiki editor and edit the things only after the official confirmation either it is a movie trailer, first look, news etc and placed just its source. I will add reference links if necessary instead of placing direct 'external sites' under content section. This block helped me to know wiki rights and guidelines. Thank You.  ~~~~}}

, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no distinction between spamming links to your own websites in the "External links" sections and spamming them via citations. You should not be doing either of these. —Psychonaut (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I understood. It would not happen again. Yogidreamss (talk) 17:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yogidreamss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm a Genuine Wiki Editor, please unblock me so that i can edit wiki with updated information of my knowledge. I found many pages with incorrect information like movie release dates, spamming external links etc as appeared on Hum Hai Raahi Car Ke but I'm unable to edit them. Due to the lack of understanding of wiki guidelines, i added external site links under content section. Sorry for that and such mistakes won't repeat in future. Believe me I'm not a spammer and don't want to use wiki as advertising medium. I'm a professional blogger and want to contribute in English Wiki. Thank You.

Decline reason:

I don't think there have been any mistakes; all you've done is put in links to three (at least) different domains, all owned by the same person (you, I imagine?): yetket.com, bollywoodhungama24.in, and bloggingaster.com. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It doesn't matter whether i put my website reference link or someone else. You should open the link and read the content whether it is genuine and helpful for readers. I made a mistake to put direct external sites link within the content section of wiki (I already said many times). But In future, if necessary then i would put a reference not direct link. I accept my mistake and sorry for that. Give me a chance to contribute again and I promise you'll be happy with my contribution. It's my last request appeal and I hope you'll understand. Yogidreamss (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter whether i put my website reference link or someone else. -- Yes, indeed, it does. We may not link to our own websites on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:13, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yogidreamss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My purpose is to provide correct and accurate information to wiki readers. I already gave an example of Wiki page Hum Hai Raahi Car Ke containing wrong information (wrong release date) and spamming external links but still no any wiki editor update that info. Is it good? If i was not blocked then i updated that info and provide its reference for official source. I'm not a spammer or advertiser, I just want to provide right information to wiki readers. I won't put any link to my site under content section and External links section, but please unblock me. Thank You. Yogidreamss (talk) 06:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Until you can give us assurances that your contributions here will consist of activities other than adding links to your websites, it is unlikely you'll be unblocked.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"I won't put any link to my site under content section and External links section" — If unblocked, how do you plan on contributing to Wikipedia? Specifically, what kind of editing will you do? ‑Scottywong | confabulate _ 21:52, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Scottywong, if you administrators think that I shouldn't take part in wiki then please don't make this conversation more longer. I can't justify myself anymore. Now it is upto you. Thank You. Yogidreamss (talk) 16:40, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to justify yourself to get unblocked. It's really up to you. I've declined the above request, feel free to make another request if you actually want to contribute to the encyclopedia in a useful capacity (i.e. not just adding links to your website). ‑Scottywong | verbalize _ 18:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user (block log | active blocks | autoblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs | abuse log) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at [email protected]. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Request reason

I already explained in my previous appeal that I did mistake to put my site links. But you can check my last contributions and text added under content section and uploaded files for official movie posters & trailer updates for Rangrezz, Aurangzeb (film), Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani etc. I added only officially confirmed stuff either it is a news, movie release date, official trailer release etc. I am again requesting that please check my last contributions other than links added (which was my mistake, never repeat). Wrong Information on Wiki - Example:Hum Hai Raahi Car Ke It's a upcoming movie and its release date officially declared but still showing initial release date, there is no update on wiki (final release date- 24 May, 2013), please also check it's external links and reference links looks likes spam having .blogspot.in type of domains under external links. This is the example where i want to contribute on wiki. I hope you administrators understand. Thank You. Yogidreamss (talk) 06:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Revoke reason

You don't seem to be willing or able to understand and abide by our policies. The fact that this appeal has sat here for nearly month is evidence of what a poor job you have done convincing us that you could do so, your contributions just before being blocked are perfect examples of what you were doing wrong. I am therefore revoking your talk page access. If you wish to appeal this further you may contact WP:BASC by email. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Hum Hai Raahi Car Ke should not be considered some of your "good work". That article does not belong on Wikipedia as it does not meet our notability standards, and fails WP:CRYSTAL. If that's an example of what you intend to do, then unblocking is not a good idea (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:14, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bwilkins, please reread the unblock request. Yogidreamss cites Hum Hai Raahi Car Ke as an example of a bad article he wants to fix, not an example of his own "good work". —Psychonaut (talk) 12:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

I can give you this apple pie for doing great work previously. Homestar Editor (talk) 21:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aurangzeb Film First Look Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aurangzeb Film First Look Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aashiqui 2 (Poster).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aashiqui 2 (Poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aurangzeb film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aurangzeb film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]