User talk:YipC

About Hinduism in Beijing[edit]

Well, I am not saying that Hinduism is the only important religion of PRC. As you can see that I have mentioned it earlier in my writing of the Beijing article that Hinduism is not among the five officially recognized religions of China. But, in the past few years, many Hindu immigrants from different countries have settled in China and their most popular destination is Beijing in Mainland China (overall it is Hong Kong). So I don't think that I have done something wrong in describing about the presence of new religion in the capital of China, also to mention that Hinduism have a very big influence over the culture of China (for example - Mount Kailash, Mansarovar Lake, origin of Buddhism and many more). So, Either you take it this way or another, but Hinduism has been a cruicial thing for China in past and is still contributing its role for the betterment of Chinese. Rishu Shukla (talk) 05:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About 'Rishu' Article[edit]

Hello! Well I don't know your real name, that's why a plain hello. I just contacted to thank you for adding reliable sources to my article for making it more consistent and accessible to the readers. If ever seeking for any kind of help with your articles on Wikipedia, you can freely notify me on my 'talk' page. Rishu Shukla (talk) 09:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

dead link - Australia Health[edit]

why would you remove a link that has a wayback link provided ? it does read with difficuty using the old brackets format and the wayback is added .... but ... Dave Rave (talk) 17:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked on it and it said page doesn't exist anymore.— Preceding unsigned comment added by YipC (talk • contribs)

The first link was dead but the archive link works fine. Anyway, removing the reference and the associated text is never the first thing to do when you find a dead link. You can try to locate another link (such as an archived copy), another reference, or simply tag the ref with "dead link" hoping that someone will fix it (or that the website was only down temporarily). Please see WP:DEADLINK and WP:DEADREF for how we handle refs with dead links. Sjö (talk) 08:39, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm ViperSnake151. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2018 Winter Olympics seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively, you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 15:58, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on AN/I concerning your editing[edit]

I noticed your userpage was deleted. You might think that no one was watching. You are wong. I've asked for you to be blocked as a racist and antisemitic troll. The discussion is here. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 18:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Your addition to Draft:Edward Jung has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]