User talk:Yarranabbe

Thank you for participating in today's editathon[edit]

Thank you for coming to the editathon today, and for sharing your energy and enthusiasm. We'd love for you to continue working on some of today's articles, which you can find listed here. Please feel free to reach out to me if you need help - you can reach me at my Talk page (linked below). You may also be interested in checking out Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia and Wikipedia:WikiProject Sydney, and the Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney page which lists future meet ups of local Wikipedians. Please use four tildes ~~~~ to sign your (Wiki) name on talk pages - this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also find the resources below helpful:

Look forward to seeing you around Wikipedia! Rubicon49bce (talk) 11:23, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Thank you for participating in the Franklin Women Wikipedia Edit-a-thon for Women in Health and Medical Research. Your enthusiasm and diligent work has made a real impact. We’d love for you to keep using those new skills – there are still many suggestions for pages to create or update on our project page. Looking forward to seeing you around Wikipedia! SnapFreeze (talk) 06:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raina MacIntyre (February 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads like a cross between a CV and a press release.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raina MacIntyre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raina MacIntyre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:32, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yarranabbe! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 15:32, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]