User talk:X!/Archives/03/2010

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hmm...

"I am not a Turkish communist, nor am I the number 10. I am not x, nor am I a microwave. I am not a chromosome, a window system, or a leopard. I am not X rated, a cartoon, nor a show for Xboxes. I am not a music album. I'm also not a radio station. But if you need help somewhere, well, X marks the spot."

Your username has ! after it, so are you X factorial? What about a Mac? Just wondering. NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 21:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

BT Wikipedia

Hi trying to help update the wikipedia page for BT. There are numerous articles citing information that is being consistently removed by user Fctchkr. Here are links to information substiantiating all (prior) updates. I am going to revert back to last edits. Fctchkr removes my citations (and those of others) consistently.

Also it seems Fctchkr is posting personal information that violate freedom of privacy including location of BT's home. Thank you

Here are links that are being disregarded and removed as valid citations :


http://www.apple.com/uk/pro/profiles/bt (In this one in bottom right sidebar author says "BT's signature production technique" http://www.wired.com/underwire/2010/02/bt-these-hopeful-machines/ http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/yb/141488552 tp://www.wired.com/underwire/2010/02/bt-these-hopeful-machines/

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by MathandArt (talk • contribs) 10:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Please see the discussion area for the BT article. I have provided my reasons for all edits. In many cases bad citations/links were provided and I removed those. I have further edited the article to remove what appears to be advertising related links and material that are not industry accepted terms. I have not put anything into this article in terms of BT's home that is not already listed in the article. As you will see I've been monitoring this article for well over a year now and apply the concept of goodwill to my updates and will discuss any items in the discussion area. I would love the input of a non-involved party weighing in on the validity of these links as I have no desire to continue having my edits reverted with no discussion taking place as to why. Thanks. Fctchkr (talk) 17:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Source of data for an image

What is the source of data for this image?--Rockfang (talk) 04:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

It comes from the Gallup results: [1] (X! · talk)  · @229  ·  04:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
You may want to put that on the image's page somewhere.--Rockfang (talk) 04:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Done. Thanks! (X! · talk)  · @246  ·  04:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Excluding redirects

Your tools are wonderful. Thank you. But I have a problem with the redirects. I tried to link my list of articles to my personal page. It almost worked fine. The trouble is that, although I tried to exclude the redirect pages ( by using using , namespace=0&redirects=noredirects in the address), the redirect pages are also displayed. It is funny; when the address is linked from the contributions page the redirects are filtered out. When the very same address is linked from another page, the redirects are not filtered out. I am rather confused. Any suggestions ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010

Soxbot has stopped updating. We're all ready for round two, and, though the pages have been blanked and, in some cases, new things have been added, the bot is not updating the scorelists. Could you give it a poke? Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 11:53, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

I'll look into this. Thanks for the notice! (X! · talk)  · @870  ·  19:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

Like a boss

Greetings X! I hope you are well. I just wanted to talk to you about your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boss Audio. As you know, administrators are obliged to give weight to some arguments more than others, depending on policy, but also to regard the discussion's consensus. In this case, I feel like the discussion might have been better given a 'no consensus' closure. Maybe I should just nominate this for deletion review so that people who are smarter (than me) can make the final call (and so that you can laugh at me sooner once your close is speedily endorsed). Let me know your thoughts, and best regards to you! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

I would have no objections to a deletion review. I did consider a no-consensus closure, and I decided that a delete was probably more valid (at the time). I do see what you're getting at though, and it would be fine to let DRV decide. (X! · talk)  · @837  ·  19:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
well, if you are considering a non-consensus, and since that is the likely result of a deletion review, why not save everyone the work involved in it? My weak keep , btw, means that I think it should be kept, but that I don't really want to get into an argument about it. DGG ( talk ) 20:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Alright, well I've opened a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 March 3#Boss Audio. Thanks greatly for your civility! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:34, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Trial?

You might want to remove the trial part from the message. multichill (talk) 20:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magyar Rádióamatõr Szövetség

Might I as you reconsider the closing you did of this Article. As you may have noted from several other National Amateur Radio organizations you have closed lately, that consensus is that National organizations _are_ notable. You may wish to read the relevent conversation at Talk:International Amateur Radio Union to note how the others all closed. And you have to admit, from a purely numbers viewpoint, your !close was not with the consensus. Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 02:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Your kind attention is needed on Important Matters

X! I am new wikipedian and I read your profile and other details, though couldn't read all Amins pages, however, I smell you are a nice and cooperative fellow (not to fly you high but its my own observation). I want to bring some important matters into your kind knowledge. As a new wikipedian I feel that some old wikipedians are being 'rude' 'bully' and 'offensive' with newbies. New-cons are enthusiastic, passionate and want to contribute more in most cases. But unfortunately old wikipedians making the road rocky, just to secure points. I wanted to paste here such discussion details going on among us. However, to avoid your page to be lengthy I request you to read last section of my talk page User_talk:Luckyaim#Disagree_with_deletion_proposal_of_my_images and please give your worthy opinion along with your 'words for guidance'. Your a bit attention can save many new wikipedians time and energy (including me) that is being wasted in useless issues. Thanks Lucky's Heaven ----- (Talk to Lucky) 12:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

It may seem like people may be rude and biting to you, but from what I can see, they are absolutely right. At the moment, it looks like your understanding of copyright laws is a little flawed, and I think you need to brush up on our policies. Even if you took the picture yourself, if it is of a copyrighted work, it is copyrighted. I'm sorry to have provided you with a response you weren't hoping for, but with copyright, it is incredibly important to enforce it because there are legal consequences if something was done wrong. (X! · talk)  · @945  ·  21:40, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

For your help with the big image move to Commons. You did a good job! multichill (talk) 14:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Glad to help! (X! · talk)  · @942  ·  21:36, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

golf

does anybody know, even roughly, what handicap would i need to be accepted for a scholarship in a USA college and by what age?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbailie506 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

You might want to try the Wikipedia:Reference Desk, as I am not the best person to ask (I have no idea about golf scoring, etc). (X! · talk)  · @942  ·  21:36, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Rats!!!

Cong-RATS!!! your our news b-rat!!!---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 22:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Yup, nicely done. Just whatever you don't get bored and neglect CHU like many other folks...! –Juliancolton | Talk
Congrats indeedy. Now can we have that bot that blocks IP addresses just before they start their next vandalism spree, and a crat Bot that's so efficient it closes RFAs before the candidate has time to answer the questions, based on nomination, editcount, starsign and the questions asked? ϢereSpielChequers 22:52, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

RFB

As the guys above me have said, I have closed your RFB as successful and added the 'crat flag. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me (or, preferably, a more experienced bureaucrat). Congrats and welcome to the corps. Useight (talk) 22:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Damn, I get busy and all this happens? :P Congrats. bibliomaniac15 22:47, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
I know, I didn't see the RfB until about an hour before it closed!---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 23:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

AdminStatsBot

Seems to run only very occasionally, rather than the 24h shown on Template:Adminstats...  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's a known issue. I'm in the middle of trying to figure out why it doesn't like to work. (X! · talk)  · @099  ·  01:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
OK, thanks for reply - and congrats on your successful RfB.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Grats

Grats on making Crat! (Beat the crat closure! muahaha) --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 22:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

I want to be the second to congratulate you! Good job! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:26, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
:)  fetchcomms☛ 22:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Yay :-) Airplaneman talk 23:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Congrats! Gosox(55)(55) 00:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Concratulations, and a request for your wisdom

Sorry about the pun, couldn't resist.  ;)

There's been a discussion at RfA which has generated some interest in tweaking the language of the RfA/RfB report. Specifically, when the counter runs down the nomination's line turns red and is listed as "expired," which can give the impression that comments are no longer permitted. Myself and another editor had suggestions for modifying it; would you care to take a look and see if either option seems reasonable?--~TPW 18:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Template for deletion

Friendly heads-up {{Imagemap}} is deprecated and nominated for deletion. It has been superceded by changes to the File namespace and I wanted to let you know, since you have a transclusion on your userpage or user talk. If you need to respond to this message, please do so on my talk. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Congrats!!

Well done on on becoming a bureaucrat. For that I award you this shiny set of spanners to assist you with your newfound rights! Your first task is to make me an admin :D Set Sail For The Seven Seas 347° 32' 15" NET 23:10, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for persevering, and best of luck. - Dank (push to talk) 23:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Congrats, X!. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Well done, X!! -- Atama頭 00:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Congrats! There are a lot of us who appreciate all that you do and the nice way you do it. All the best with your new rights duties - Ret.Prof (talk) 00:29, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Mazel tov! It means both congratulations and good luck! Valley2city‽ 03:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Grats. The changing username pages is -->that way. Pmlineditor ∞ 05:45, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Well done, good luck with the new tools, :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 08:31, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Congrats on the bureaucracy! OK, that sounds odd, but congrats anyway! --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Adminstats request

I asked this at Template Talk:Adminstats, but it is probably better here:

How do I use the style? I have a style template I want to use at User:Phantomsteve/Adminstats/Style2 and change the final line of Template:Adminstats/Phantomsteve to read |style=User:Phantomsteve/Adminstats/Style2}} - but when the bot updated it, that line was changed back to the default - is there anyway to get it to keep the style I want, or do I have to change it every time the bot updates?

Ignore this, as I realise I just use the style as a parameter! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 19:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Also:

  1. Is it possible to have a line added at the end of the individual Adminstats page (e.g. Template:Adminstats/Phantomsteve which says something along the lines of Updated by SoxBot at 08:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)? As they aren't updated every 24 hours, then at least anyone looking at the stats will know how old they are! - I have manually done it on my Adminstats page in an edit a minute ago!
  2. Is it possible to use the 'bot to update Adminbars as well? As the content is the same as Adminstats apart from the first and final lines, then I would assume that it would be reasonably simple to do? (ps: and if so, could an "Updated by SoxBox at..." be added as well?)

Finally, congrats on the 'cratship :D

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Childcalledit.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Childcalledit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Indonesian Translation correction for the Edit Counter

As "Bennylin" said before (at your archive), please change :

  • penggunae -> pengguna
  • menterjemahkan -> menerjemahkan
  • halamam terjemahan -> halaman terjemahan
  • Untuk keterangan bagaimana untuk membantu -> untuk (lowercase "u") keterangan bagaimana cara membantu
  • Memerlukan X megabytes memory untuk mengolah -> Memerlukan memori sebesar X megabita untuk mengolahnya

Please change it because Indonesian Wikipedia now use your editcounter at "Toolbox". Thanks.  Kenrick  Talk 13:39, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done (X! · talk)  · @719  ·  16:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Automated edits tool

"Script counts not available for users with more than 100K edits, sorry." Can you fix this? NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 17:17, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For stepping up with the username bot, it's good to have a bot out there scanning new names again! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:26, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Bot Request

Hi,

I'm a member of WP:ESSAY C/C, and we're looking for a solution that will crawl essays, slap our WikiProject banner on those that don't have one, and assign them an importance rating based on how many incoming links they have (or update said rating if it has already been assigned). There are just over 1000 essays, and they need to be continuously crawled (weekly would probably be good) as the number of incoming links change. Is this something you could whip up for us?

Congrats on your RfB nom, by the way, and I hope you get it! ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 09:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

No love up in here? That's okay. I know you're busy. At least tell me "no," so I know you've read the request...please. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 16:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, looks like this message was gobbled up by the next message (I always click the "last change" button on the orange bar). This is something you may want to ask on BOTREQ, as I've always had problems with these types of bots. (X! · talk)  · @714  ·  16:08, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you! ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 05:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Request

Hey X!

On 9 Feb 2010 you deleted a page on my deceased grandfather, (Master Gunnery Sergeant) Hubert Joseph Kupper.

I don't disagree that his accomplishments may not warrant a Wiki page... but I would like to get a copy of the deleted page(s). I think that the info was originally uploaded by my Mother's cousin, who is also deceased (and so I cannot get a copy that way).

Thanks, Karen Heckman 70.100.106.66 (talk) 02:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I've userfied it at User:X!/Hubert_Joseph_Kupper. (X! · talk)  · @483  ·  10:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
United States
Christianity
Italy
Shark Island, Cronulla Beach
East Siberian Sea
Blackground Records
Canada
Vimy
Vert
Kyoto Prize
Enkephalin
Forehead
Sat.1
Mexico
Japan
China
Articled clerk
Al 'Aziziyah
Cat
Cleanup
Jesus
VAIO
Social exclusion
Merge
Iraq
Nazism
Slavery
Add Sources
Racism
Norra begravningsplatsen
Cryotherapy
Wikify
1990s
Government
1950s
Expand
Sesamoid bone
Dog
Truevision TGA

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

SoxBot reporting usernames???

I didn't know SoxBot could report username violations. NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 04:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

It will for 7 days... Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SoxBot 23. :) (X! · talk)  · @225  ·  04:24, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
"The string called IP address has a comment associated with it:Array SoxBot (talk) 04:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)" Is "array" a bug? NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 04:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
It is a bug that has already been fixed. (X! · talk)  · @239  ·  04:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Could you please add "vulva" to the blacklist? NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ msg • changes) 20:20, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Could you also add "cunt" to the blacklist? Thanks! NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ msg • changes) 18:34, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
The latter was already there, and I've added the other. NerdyScienceDude, in future, rather than bothering X!, just add {{EditProtected}} on the talk page :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 20:14, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Toolserver.org

Hi X!
Thanks for toolserver.org, I'm a big fan of it. I noticed your "RfA votes" calculator tool. I also noticed it has no RfB votes section. Is this somewhere else, or does it not exist? If it doesn't, would you mind adding one? Thanks, and good luck on your RfB! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

No, there currently does not exist a RfB votes section. I will get on this at some point and it will be here: tools:~soxred93/rfbp. Thanks for the idea, and thanks for the good luck! (X! · talk)  · @164  ·  02:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Strike that. I just added a checkbox on the main /rfap/ form, so now you can choose between one of the other. (X! · talk)  · @172  ·  03:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! Also, how about a tool that shows how many RfAs or RfBs were closed by a particular user? That tool might be especially helpful in WP:RfBs. Another thing, I like the way on EnWiki your tools are at the bottom of a user's contrib page, making them easily accessible. Could you do the same thing on Commons, as your tool is much better the the existing one? Also, is there a tool that shows the XfDs a particular user participated in or closed? Please leave a {{Talkback}} on my talk page. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:19, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Pages created not working

The tool isn't working for pages created in the project space. Instead it treats the links as if the pages are in article space.— Dædαlus Contribs 08:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Fixed.... looks like I'm still cleaning up tools from http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2010-February/046777.html... argh... (X! · talk)  · @601  ·  13:24, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

User:SoxBot/UAA/Blacklist

Hi, I made some changes to this page. I just wanted to make sure what this wouldn't affect the bot. Cheers — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Nope, that's why I used an on-wiki blacklist. :) (X! · talk)  · @597  ·  13:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Account Creation Tool Interface Help

Hi :) If you could take a look at my discussions with User:Stifle on my talk page, you might be able to suggest to me what should be the next step to be taken to allow me access to the tool. Do please reply on my talk page, in case you do reply. Warm regards, ▒ ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ▒ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 18:34, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Got solved :) Thanks anyway ▒ ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ▒ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 12:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Admin Coaching: Reconfirmation

I was looking through the coaches at Wikipedia:Admin_coaching/Status and saw that your entry was commented out. I have moved it to the "Reconfirmation" section.

Could you let me know if you are still interesting in being involved with Admin Coaching, or if you would prefer to have your name removed from the "reconfirmation" list and placed on the "retired" list. If you want to be involved, could you please move your entry from "Reconfirmation" to "Active" and indicate how many students you would be willing to have (obviously, if you are actively coaching at the moment, then please indicate this!)

If I do not hear from you within a week, I will assume that you would like to have your name removed from the list of coaches and moved to the retired list.

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 07:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

linkspam triggering by external links

Hi X!, In the last couple of days, I added links to the website of Nema (www.nema.be), a Belgian organization of patients with a neuromuscular disease (NMD). I added this link in both dutch as well as english WIKI pages, because a lot of patients and their families in Belgium and the Netherlands look up information on English WIKI pages. Apparently, I triggered the linkspam filter 80 by doing these additions so quickly and on so many (around 20 I guess) pages. However, we really provide information for all diseases described on the pages where I inserted the links. To proof this, please have a look at http://www.nema.be/index.php?cat=nma&p=lijst_nma , where you can find a list with all diseases we have information on. Since I am a WIKI newbie, please let me know if I did something wrong in the way I added these links. I really hope the links may stay, because we surely have relevant information for patients and their family and a lot of them look up info via Wikipedia.

Looking forward to your answer,

All the best, --Patrik claes (talk) 12:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Finished translation for Edit Counter

Italian Translation


  • Edit Counter (versione $1)
  • Navigazione
  • Mostra sorgente
  • $1 non è una wiki valida
  • Benvenuto nell'edit counter di X!
  • Username
  • Wiki
  • Invia
  • MySQL error, per piacere segnalato a X! usando <aexternal free">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:X!/Bugs">il bug reporter.</a> Assicurati di riportare il seguente SQL error quando riportando:
    $1
  • $1 non esiste.
  • Attenzione: Replag è alto, le modifiche più recenti di $ 1 non possono essere visualizzate.
  • Voce
  • Informazioni generali dell'utente
  • Gruppo utente
  • Prima modifica
  • Unico articolo modificato
  • Media delle modifiche per pagina
  • Modifiche totali (eliminate incluse)
  • Modifiche eliminate
  • Modifiche reali
  • Formato numero($1)
  • Namespace totali
  • Mesi conteggiati
  • Log
  • Blocchi utente
  • Permessi utenti modificati
  • Utenze create
  • Pagine cancellate
  • Pagine patrollate
  • Pagine protette
  • Pagine ripristinate
  • Utenti sbloccati
  • Pagine sprotette
  • File caricati
  • Utenti rinominati
  • Permessi concessi
  • Permessi revocati
  • Pagine spostate
  • Voce più modificata
  • Eseguito in $1 secondi
  • $1 megabytes di memoria richiesti per eseguire.
  • Mostra in altre lingue:
  • (incomplete by $1 messages)
  • Vuoi aiutare nella traduzione? Guarda la <anofollow" class="external free">http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/translate.php">pagina di traduzione</a> per avere informazioni su come aiutare.
  • Actions
  • L'edit counter di X!'s è fermo a causa di un problema di MySQL.

Yarrow (il server database) è rotto, e, come tale, non vi è alcun altro modo per ottenere dei risultati del tool. Questo problema è comune a tutti i tool che accedono al server database. Se si desidera solo un numero normale, è possibile ottenere dalla tua finestra delle preferenze. Ci scusiamo per il disagio.

SoxBot namewatcher

"Andrecknes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · edit filter log • hardblock · softblock · spamblock) Matches the literal pattern called German for "filth". SoxBot (talk) 21:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)"

Which part matched? NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ msg • changes) 22:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Looks to me like a false positive match to dreck. ϢereSpielChequers 07:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

New edit counter tool

Are you looking to switch over interfaces with the new one? I do like the newer one (looks clean); except, I would kindly ask that you add the user logged actions to the newer counter before switching over (if you decide to do so). Thanks again for the tool. Kindly Calmer Waters 07:35, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I removed the log actions for three reasons:
  1. They slowed down the tool for quite a few seconds,
  2. The code used to generate them was a mess, and
  3. I am planning on making a special log counter that duplicates the functions of the edit counter, but for logs. Part of the rewrite of the entire edit counter code was that it would be portable, meaning I could make a log counter fairly easily. With the old code, it was very difficult.
If it turns out that it was too popular to remove, I'll go ahead and put it in, but it's a lot faster and cleaner without it. (X! · talk)  · @621  ·  13:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
That makes alot of sense. Well, thank you for taking the time to explain that for me. I'm am only beginning to scratch the surface of the vast intricacies involved in the making and maintaining of such tools, but understand that even the things that "appear" easy, are in reality usually far from it, so thanks again. Kindly Calmer Waters 02:16, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

bot username reports

Sometimes the bot is reporting names, such as User:Purist productions with the comment that the report was delayed till the user edited, when in fact it has not. (I even checked the edit filter for attempted edits the last time I saw it) Beeblebrox (talk) 18:54, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Your new edit counter

It looks great but maybe it would be nice if you added the amount of edits on each type of page (eg. article 654 edits, 76.5%) to make it clearer. Apart from that, well done--Pianoplonkers (talk • contribs) 15:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Done. (X! · talk)  · @694  ·  15:40, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
  • The counter's great; I especially like the popups and the fact that it fills the entire screen. I'm aware that this might slow down the counter, but is it possible to add "top edited" for editors with 100,000+ edits (or wherever the cutoff point is)? Overall, it's a superb tool. Airplaneman talk 02:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I like the new edit counter. "©2010 Soxred93" Why is it copyrighted? Also, why doesn't it say X! rather than Soxred93? And what happened to the log actions? NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ msg • changes) 02:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Pianoplonkers, I think I've fixed what you asked for. Airplaneman, no. Even if it does load a little slower, it is also very resource intensive, and I must only use my fair share of resources on the Toolserver, as it is a shared server. NSD: I think you have a slight misunderstanding of copyright. Everything that anyone creates is copyrighted, under the idea of Natural copyright. By adding a © to the page, it is just indicating to people that it is indeed copyrighted, for people who may not have realized that before. Additionally, if someone were to steal my design or code, it proves that I was indeed the rightful creator in the event that I decided to sue. Soxred93 used to be my username here, it was the username in which I got a toolserver account, in which I passed RfA, and spent 3 months as an admin under that name. I was renamed to X! in August 2008, long after I started my toolserver account. It's impossible to rename accounts, so I kept it as Soxred93 for continuity. As for log actions, please see the penultimate section on this page. (X! · talk)  · @213  ·  04:06, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Ah yes, if it's copyrighted, then would that mean it would be impossible to upload a free screenshot to Commons. Afterall, what's wrong with free and open-source? NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ msg • changes) 04:17, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Good job. I like both...Modernist (talk) 04:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

If you click the username on the new counter, and it has a space, a "+" is put in place of that. Nubio^2 might be dead, I don't know though. Just some notes. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 21:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Nubio2 moved to a new server, I'll fix that. With the +'s, that seems to be a fixable issue too. (X! · talk)  · @497  ·  10:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

The percentages seem to be a little off, by a few tenths. I noticed it when comparing the old one with the new one. Before this post, mainspace edits showed 53.33% on the old (which is what my calculator tells me) and 53.41% on the new. —Akrabbimtalk 03:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I noticed that, I'm unsure about why that's happening. I'll go have a look at that. (X! · talk)  · @497  ·  10:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

The counter looks nice :) But, I think it would be nice if there was an uncollapse all option. Also, is it possible to add brackets, on the deleted edits, that would show the number of the edits that were deleted by the same editor himself? I mean, I have reverted many of my edits and it's ruining my stats :P Oh, and when the tooltip is showing up when look at stats by hovering the cursor over a month's stats, it would be nice if there was some way to add color to it to distinguish which color is which, without having to go up to the color legend. --JokerXtreme (talk) 10:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

"Deleted edits" does not mean "reverted edits". It is ones that have been on a page that was deleted. (such as tagging a page for CSD) (X! · talk)  · @497  ·  10:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Option for other wikis in Range Contributions tool

Hi X!,

I really like this tool but I think it would be even better if it's possible to (dropdown) select the database in the form. Currently it seems limited to en.wikipedia. Thanks for this great tool, Krinkle (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Month counts

I would appreciate having the month counts back, can you please resume them? Thanks...Modernist (talk) 23:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Smile!

Hello X!, Thesevenseas has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Set Sail For The Seven Seas 35° 7' 45" NET 02:20, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Finished translation for Edit Counter - pt

  • Contador de Edições (versão $1)
  • Navegação
  • Veja fonte
  • $1 não é um wiki válido
  • Bem-vindo X!Veja a contagem de suas edições!
  • Nome de utilizador
  • Wiki
  • Autorização
  • Erro de MySQL, por favor avise para X! Use <aexternal free">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:X!/Bugs">aviso de bug.</a> Seja claro na indicação sobre o erro de SQL quando o reportar:
    $1
  • $1 não existe.
  • Cuidado! O número de acessos está alto. As modificações antes de $1 podem não ser mostradas.
  • Artigo
  • Informações gerais do utilizador
  • Grupos de utilizador
  • Primeira edição
  • Únicos artigos editados
  • Média de edições por página
  • Total de edições (inclusive anuladas)
  • Edições anuladas
  • Edições válidas
  • Formato numérico($1)
  • Total de Domínios
  • Contagem mensal
  • Logs
  • Utilizadores bloqueados
  • Modificação na habilitação do utilizador
  • Novas contas
  • Páginas eliminadas
  • Páginas patrulhadas
  • Páginas protegidas
  • Páginas restauradas
  • Editores não bloqueados
  • Páginas desprotegidas
  • Arquivos carregados
  • Renomeio de nomes de utilizador
  • Direitos do utilizador
  • Direitos revogados
  • Páginas movidas
  • Artigos com mais edições
  • Executado em $1 segundos
  • Usou $1 megabytes da memória para executar.
  • Vide outras linguagens:
  • (Mensagens de incompleto:$1)
  • Quer ajuda com as traduções? Veja <anofollow" class="external free">http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/translate.php">página de traduções</a> para informações de como ajudar.
  • Ações
  • O contador de edições de X!' não funciona por um problema no MySQL. O servidor Yarrow está fora do ar e assim não há maneira da ferramenta trazer os resultados. Esse problema é comum em todas as ferramentas que acessam o servidor de dados. Se você quer apenas os números, pode pegá-los de sua janela de preferências. Desculpe a inconveniência.
  • Status do MySQL
  • Desculpe mas por força de disponibilidade para ferramentas, a contagem dos artigos com mais edições não carrega para utilizadores com mais de 45000 edições.
  • w
  • d
  • h
  • m
  • s

--Arthemius x (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit Counter idea

Is it possible to have an edit counter add-on that used the size of the edits as another factor? My understanding is that the edit counter, as great a tool as it is, does not take into consideration whether edits are minor or made by bots. Nor does it look at the size of the edit. So if editor A just changed a spelling, and editor B added a hundred words to an article, both edit counts would be considered identical while the actual "improvement" value is nowhere the same. The usefullness of adding the size of the edit would also be a great value to "Revision history statistics" in an article's "history" page. Just an idea, but I'm sure it would be a lot of work to incorporate. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

First of all, this would not be necessary. Edit counters are supposed to be impartial when counting edits, they must give exact figures. It's the responsibility of the person behind the screen to take the results with a grain of salt. Secondly, the size difference is not stored in the database, so it would not be possible either. Sorry. (X! · talk)  · @851  ·  19:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
I would recommend a minor word change at the bottom. It currently has "Sorry, but in order to consume my fair share of toolserver resources, Top Edited Articles are disabled for users with over 45000 edits." It implies that somehow disabling it for users with 45,000+ edits helps you consume some alloted amount. I'd recommend rewording to something with the effect of "...in order to consume only my fair share..." Also, can you configure it to display the number of minor edits? I'm not sure if that's do-able, but that would approximate the request above. Useight (talk) 22:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Possible loopholes in the edit counter opt-in

Not sure if the tool considers these or not:

  1. Any admin can create the EditCounterOptIn.js file for any user.
  2. A user who has an account on Meta with a given username is not necessarily the same user with that username on the English Wikipedia.

TUSC, for example, requires that the user make an edit to his talk page with a specific edit summary. PleaseStand (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

New edit counter: show/hide issues

Hello! I've been using your new edit counter. I like it! It has a much more usable interface. The one issue I've noticed with it so far is that upon clicking "show" in the top-edited articles statistics, the "hide" link is shifted right to the end of the longest page title in that particular list. That makes it rather frustrating for someone (like me) who just wants to take a quick glance at it, clicking it, and then clicking again to hide it. It would be nice if it could keep still. Thanks for looking at this issue, and thanks for a great edit counter! :-) Cheers!☮ —Ecw.Technoid.Dweeb | contributions | talk 11:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

If you want screenshots, I can provide them. Cheers!☮ —Ecw.Technoid.Dweeb | contributions | talk 11:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for making this counter; it's such a useful tool. I just came here to note the same issue that I find is already mentioned here: the jumping show/hide links. It would be a lot more intuitive to have them stay in the same place. I would also second the request, in the section above, for an "uncollapse all" option of some sort. Princess Lirin (talk) 01:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the idea, both of you. Unfortunately, I am not very good at Javascript (The show/hide code is the one used for navboxes here), so I may have to outsource for help. I will have a look at it, though. (X! · talk)  · @493  ·  10:50, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Just so you know, they are staying in the same place now, but they are stuck on displaying "hide" (the lists are shown), and clicking the "hide" links doesn't do anything... :-P Good luck! Cheers!☮ —Ecw.Technoid.Dweeb | contributions | talk 01:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit Counter

Hello, I really like your new edit counter; I would also like to mention that the color scheme needs to be changed. I'm tired of red, yellow, green, blue and pink. --White Trillium (talk) 04:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment. The problem is, when there have to be over 20 colors, my choices for colors which are easy to recognize are extremely limited. As such, there is very little ability to change the colors. If you could come up with 20 unique colors that work equally well, I would be happy to put them in. (X! · talk)  · @491  ·  10:46, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for the blanking the page, my computer is really slow. So what colors would you like me pick and what colors are not suitable. --White Trillium (talk) 23:50, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Anything that is visible. (X! · talk)  · @039  ·  23:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Alright, how about #cef2e0, #cedff2, #ddcef2, #f2e0ce and #fcfcfc. --White Trillium (talk) 00:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Hmmm... Please *don't* change them — I have become familiar with the colours and I associate them with their corresponding categories (red=article, yellow=user, purple=user-talk, &c.) ;-) Thanks. Cheers!☮ —Ecw.Technoid.Dweeb | contributions | talk 01:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Username

Can you change my username to just Rin tin tin please? Rin tin tin 1996 (talk) 00:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Oops, wrong place to do this. Sorry. Rin tin tin 1996 (talk) 19:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Editcounter

Hi, I've translated the new opt-in message to German for your editconter:

EN: Graphs have been set to opt-in as a result of a single complaint resulting in what is essentially a cease-and-desist letter from the toolserver admins. If you want to see graphs, please create User:Wikidienst/EditCounterOptIn.js with any content. Alternatively, you can create meta:User:Wikidienst/EditCounterGlobalOptIn.js to opt-in across all Wikimedia wikis.

DE: Die grafischen Statistiken wurden infolge eines Datenschutzproblems deaktiviert. Um sie anzuzeigen, erstelle die Seite Benutzer:$USERNAME/EditCounterOptIn.js mit beliebigem Inhalt, für eine globale Zustimmung auf allen Wikimedia-Projekten erstelle die Seite auf Meta-Wiki: Benutzer:$USERNAME/EditCounterGlobalOptIn.js.

--Wikidienst (talk) 21:55, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit Count Parser Function

Hiya X!! Would you be able to create an edit count parser function? It would come in mighty handy. Thanks. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 288° 13' 15" NET 19:12, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

I did a few months ago, and it was reverted. (X! · talk)  · @884  ·  20:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
You did? Curious. How comes I didn't come across it? Even more puzzling though, why did they revert it considering that these two pages exist? Are they targeting you in particular or something? Sounds fishy to me! Set Sail For The Seven Seas 358° 4' 45" NET 23:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
One other thing, do you still have the source code? and is it programmed in PHP? Maybe we could reattempt to get it up and running. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 270° 1' 30" NET 18:00, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit counter

On my edit counter page, there was a 'User has not yet opted in. If you want to see graphs, please create User:Bejinhan/EditCounterOptIn.js with any content.' Upon clicking the link, I was directed to here. Is something wrong? Also, I want to see the graphs. How do I go about creating 'content' on the js page? Thanks! BejinhanTalk 06:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and why was the edit counter removed just because of 1 editor. Seriously! There are many of us out there who use it. Sorry, but I really find this frustrating and not to mention annoying too. BejinhanTalk 06:15, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
(tps)paste User:Bejinhan/EditCounterOptIn.js in your search box or just click on this and it will start the page you need to optin. then type anything and save. then you should be good to go. Calmer Waters 06:19, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Regardless of whether it was 1 editor or 1000, if the toolserver admins say to stop using the toolserver in some manner, you follow that request. And it's not entirely unreasonable – I don't agree with it, but I see where they're coming from. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 06:28, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
It wasn't removed because of 1 single editor. The wish to remove comes from a discussion at our village pump (perma). It has also been discussed before. See also the discussion at the Administrators' noticeboard (perma). Looks like the German community is a little more concerned about aggregating data than others are. Maybe our laws in that field are stricter too, I don't know. Also note that we have an opt-in at our List of Wikipedians by number of edits instead of the possibility to opt out like over here. --95.88.79.67 (talk) 17:44, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
It has been noted many, many times that only people from dewiki have ever complained. However, no matter how many times it is stated, the admins refuse to change their stance on the issue. (X! · talk)  · @804  ·  18:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
It's sad, but I guess despite its limitations and slowness, WikiChecker will be getting a lot more use now. --Tothwolf (talk) 04:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Please let me add my thanks for your work on this, and my dismay at the silliness created by others, along with the many similar comments above. I've gotten my own opt-in js file working fine, but before coming to your user talk, I was confused by the wording of the message at the tool display. Maybe it's just me, but I thought I'd pass it along in case anyone else might be confused. I'm referring to where it says "with any content". When I first saw that, I though that it meant that I had to create my own monthly graph and so forth, containing "any content" that I wanted it to display, which dismayed me for obvious reasons. After reading here at your talk, I realized that it simply means that it doesn't matter what the content of the js file is, so long as it exists. Perhaps you might want to consider changing the wording from "with any content" to something along the lines of "; the content of the file does not matter" or something like that. Just a thought. Thanks again. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

FYI: A link to that AN/I case

Didn't know if you saw this on irc, but here it is again (the case regarding the suicide threat). The editor in question's name was The Legendary Sky Attacker. Auntie E. (talk) 19:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

New edit counter

Not a bug -- but is it possible to have all namespace listing opt to "show", maybe a "show all" switch or a preference to be set? Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:05, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

P.S. Thanks for your work, I use your stuff frequently. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:05, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Not a bug at all, but I came here with exactly the same thought as Beyond My Ken. I like the expanded boxes for quick browsing. Shadowjams (talk) 05:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Not a bug here either; it looks great. Why show all edits as the "bottom line" rather than all-minus-deleted as per custom? And what are deleted edits anyway? Sarah777 (talk) 22:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted edits are those that were made to a page that was subsequently deleted - CSD noms are the most common, or following an AfD of an article you worked on. I think it makes more sense this way - Live+Deleted=Total. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

New Edit count tool

Just an opinion: I like the default expansion of the article counts in the old tool. Could you add a parameter in the EditCounterOptIn.js maybe?

Thanks for a good tool! Jmcw37 10:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I agree, it would be helpful to default to show instead of to hide. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Love the by-month breakdown hoverbox. Genius. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

I hate to say it, but it sucks. White Trillium (talk) 05:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:X!/Archives/03/2010&oldid=1149834145"