User talk:Wolf of Fenric

Welcome!

Hello, Wolf of Fenric, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Tim! 22:06, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoniverse articles

Please refrain from adding boyfriends, girlfriends, family, coworkers, friends and fellow companions to the "affiliates" section of articles. This detail is all included in the main body of the article. The affiliates section should be a very brief account of their actual affiliations - Doctor incarnations and organizations only, pretty much.~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 20:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking - not my opinion, just conventional practice. For example - Buffy Summers affiliations should read Watcher's Council and Scooby Gang. We could add all her boyfriends, high school classmates, parents etc. but life details all go in the body of the article. An affiliations section of the infobox should just basically sum stuff up. Sarah Jane is a companion of 2 Doctors as well as a tag team with K-9. Rose is a companion of 2 Doctors. Mickey is a companion of one Doctor and worked for The Preachers. That's all "affiliations" requires. I'm certain the consensus at WP:WHO would agree.~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 14:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Italicizing titles

Hello Wolf of Fenric. Please see the following which I have copied from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Doctor Who

Where mentioned in subsequent text, story titles should be italicised and reference should be made to the year it was broadcast (and/or which Doctor's era it belonged to). For the classic series, if references are made to individual episodes within serials, the title should be put in quotes.

This effects the first three seasons of the First Doctor. Thus, your current edits are italicizing episodes which are supposed to be in quotes. For example on The Web Planet you italicized the note about "The Lion" and "The Space Museum" - this note was referring to the individual episode names and not the entire serial. My apologies for crashing into the edits that you are making and some of your italicizing is okay but please stop further edits to episode titles. If you have any questions please feel free to ask at the project talk page and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 21:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for your note. I think that there are more style guidelines at wikiP than any one person can ever keep in their mind. As I said above any questions you might come up against can be posted at the Dr Who projects talk page. Should you venture beyond the DW pages here are two other good places to get answers from: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard or the Wikipedia:Village Pump. Most wikipedians (though not all sadly) are glad to help and will answer your questions in fairly short order. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 20:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Work

Hi again. I just wanted to leave a note saying good work on linking characters, planets etc to other wikipages about them in the Doctor Who articles. It is alot of work and your accuracy is much appreciated. If you haven't already done so you may want to check back to The Space Museums page as I think I may have reverted your tying of Xeros to its page when I was fixing the italics situation. Many apologies and keep up the good work. MarnetteD | Talk 17:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Doctor Who henchmen

An editor has nominated List of Doctor Who henchmen, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Doctor Who henchmen and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Is there any way of removing the entries of vandals on my history? I want to remain anonymous, yet my name shows up in my history thanks to a vandal. Wolf of Fenric 02:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it's personal information, yes, through WP:OVERSIGHT. Otherwise, no. Real96 03:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict) What you want is Oversight - the process through which individual edits can be hidden to normal users. In this case, I believe a request would be approved. To make such a request, follow the directions given at WP:RFO carefully. It may take some time for the revision to be removed from the page history, but it probably will be eventually. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 03:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marsha Shandur

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Marsha Shandur, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — iridescenti (talk to me!) 11:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's been contested so now sent to AfD to decide — iridescenti (talk to me!) 14:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your hard work

Hello again. I just wanted to let you know that it looks like the hard work that you put in linking many items in the Dr Who articles is being undone. User:Rambutan is claening up these articles using AWB an autwikibrowser program that does more things than I understand about computers. Now I am not trying to start a conflict and if you are okay with these changes then my apologies for bothering you. But if you are concerned I suggest that you go to the wikiproject Dr Who talk page and explaing what you were doing in your original edits and see if the members of the project want your edits in the article or not. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 20:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So that you know that I am not trying to play you off against each other I have posted a variation of this note on Rambutan's page. Now, I also know that I don't always see all of the discussions at the projects talk page and it is possible that you have spoken with each other and that a consensus has been reached, if so, I apologize for taking up your time.MarnetteD | Talk 21:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I look at his recent edits it looks like the it might only be The Five Doctors that has been affected. If you look at the difference between the page before and after his his AWB cleanup edit I think you will see what my message was about. I have restored the Pertwee link but didn't touch the others until you had a chance to talk, though I now see from his user page that they may be unavailable for a few days. Please also read the note I have left on this editors page as I want to be fair to you both and if I am only making things worse I will need to be corrected by you both. MarnetteD | Talk 21:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you note. I had gotten used to your linking villians/planets/races etc that I assumed that the things being removed were yours. Sorry for jumping the gun. I didn't mean to create more work for you, but, you may want to leave a short note on this editor's page explaining what you have been doing. MarnetteD | Talk 21:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Rambutan! I'm very sorry if I've caused any trouble or loss of work - I hate it when someone just takes out my contributions! The AWB program was suggesting that I delink all those things because they were multiple wikilinks (ie there was already a link to that page higher up in the article). I didn't notice about the cast-list issue, that many characters would appear in linked form both there and higher up in the article. So please accept my apologies!--Rambutan (talk) 06:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Story arcs in Doctor Who

I think that might be a COI violation :P Will ^{(We're flying the flag all over the world)} 01:27, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Story arcs in Doctor Who

Hey there. I'm concerned about some additions that you made to this page. Please read/respond to the discussion here I want your honest opinion. Let me know what you think of the point I bring up.--Dr who1975 05:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Burn With Me"

Due to the fact that the above Phrase featured prominently in last night's Doctor Who Episode, 42, I'd like to re-instate it as a recurring theme in Doctor Who - except I can't find it int he article's history. Can you help? SaliereTheFish 13:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

42_(Doctor_Who) 'Burn with me.'

I notice you appear to have bypassed the talk page discussion about this line when you decided to put it back into the continuity section, citing its mention in [the official BBC Fact File]. It has been pointed out that the very same site mentions such vital pieces of information as "42 ... is the answer to Life, the Universe and Everything" and "42 minutes is the approximate length of a standard episode of Doctor Who". As such, I'm not sure your reasoning for putting it back in holds up. Digby Tantrum 15:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Just wanted to say, thank you for all your hard work with the Story arcs article :) I'm just informing you that official policy about episode titles since "Rose" is that they take quotation form, with serials remaining in italics. ~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 21:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, basically the policy people descended on the Wikiproject talk page and everyone came to the conclusion that it has to be done with the policy on serials still a bit iffy, but they formalized it in the end. As far as I know, they're going through the episode articles from Rose-42 at the moment, but it's so much more than that because we have all the classic serials linking in terms of continuity... the characters, elements etc. It'll probably be almost done in a month if the whole Wikiproject gets informed.~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 14:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UNIT in the Sound of Drums

The President says "not one unit", not "not even UNIT" in the trailer. I've checked ten-fold. Will ^(talk) 00:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, rewatching the trailer in good quality (and not the crappy RealVideo version on BBC's site), you're right, but it is ambiguous. Will ^(talk) 18:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Theme tune/Drumbeat

Find a source, then insert it. Not the other way round. Will ^(talk) 00:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not obvious. To me, the drumbeat is just "one-two-three-four one-two-three-four one-two-three-four" Will ^(talk) 00:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The drumming in the trailer for Last of the Time Lords doesn't sound remotely like anything in the theme tune, though. Will ^(talk) 00:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same thing, though - the Master hearing the drums. Will ^(talk) 00:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We can't add it in even if it's obvious: look at Blink (Doctor Who) - the letter delivery is a homage to Back to the Future II, but we don't have that fact in because there's no sources saying it is. Verifiability, not truth. Will ^(talk) 00:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responded to that on the episode's talk page. Will ^(talk) 00:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add to what Will has said. I accept that you, and many other people (including the Fear Forecasters) think that the drumming sounds like the theme tune. However, that is not conclusive evidence that the former was derived from the latter. The similarity between the two could simply be coincidental, and there is no official source suggesting otherwise. The Fear Forecasters are not an official source; they are members of the public who have been allowed to preview the episode. The fact that their views appear on the Doctor Who website does not signify that they are correct; various popular rumours have appeared on the site before, and many of them have not been substantiated. I hope that this has helped to clarify the situation for you. Robin S 00:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ogron television stories

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Ogron television stories, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Ogron television stories fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clutter; not significant enough

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Ogron television stories, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:Ogron television stories itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Thal television stories

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Thal television stories, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Thal television stories fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clutter; not significant enough

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Thal television stories, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:Thal television stories itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yeti television stories

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Yeti television stories, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Yeti television stories fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clutter; not significant enough

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Yeti television stories, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:Yeti television stories itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Macra television stories

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Macra television stories, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Macra television stories fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clutter; not significant enough

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Macra television stories, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:Macra television stories itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Rani television stories

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:The Rani television stories, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:The Rani television stories fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clutter; not significant enough

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:The Rani television stories, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:The Rani television stories itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Key to Time

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:The Key to Time, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:The Key to Time fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clutter; unnecessary

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:The Key to Time, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:The Key to Time itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Black Guardian television stories

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Black Guardian television stories, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Black Guardian television stories fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clutter; not significant enough

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Black Guardian television stories, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:Black Guardian television stories itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Peladon television stories

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Peladon television stories, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Peladon television stories fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clutter; not significant enough

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Peladon television stories, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:Peladon television stories itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New Earth television stories

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:New Earth television stories, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:New Earth television stories fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clutter; not significant enough

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:New Earth television stories, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:New Earth television stories itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mara television stories

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Mara television stories, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Mara television stories fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clutter; not significant enough

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Mara television stories, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:Mara television stories itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mentor television stories

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Mentor television stories, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Mentor television stories fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clutter; not significant enough

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Mentor television stories, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:Mentor television stories itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion

Hi - a bunch of Doctor Who templates you recently created (the ones the bot notified you of above) have been put on the templates for deletion page here. Just thought you should be notified. --Brian Olsen 16:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I offended

I was reminded of List of The Sarah Jane Adventures planets. I understand your only intention is to be helpful. Sarcasm is a large part of me, most of it's in jest, I just need to refrain more from using it on Wikipedia.~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 17:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Doctor Who TARDIS travellers

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of Doctor Who TARDIS travellers, by Aderack (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of Doctor Who TARDIS travellers fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

cruft; unnecessary

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of Doctor Who TARDIS travellers, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate List of Doctor Who TARDIS travellers itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who vehicles

Please stop restoring the non-notable vehicles. At least two editors now disagree with including them, so the onus is on you to establish consensus through discussion *before* restoring the text. Thank you. --Ckatz^chat _spy 20:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hiram K. "Brains" Hackenbacker

Hi. Thanks for creating the Brains article. As pointed out on the discussion page for the article, the name Hiram K. Hackenbacker was an alias that Brains used when undercover rather than his true name. In light of this, do you have any objections to the page being moved to 'Brains (Thunderbirds)'? Thanks. Bobfos 18:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rare FM

The image was tagged as missing a use rationale on June 5, and deleted about six weeks later. You are welcome to upload another image as long as you can provide a rationale for it. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:05, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's some good reading on use rationales at WP:FURG, a guideline page outlining what they look like. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rare-fm-logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Rare-fm-logo.png. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Alpha Centauri.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alpha Centauri.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

K-9 Mark II

Unless you have a source which says that the box featured at the end of The Invasion of Time contains a fully functional K-9 unit, then, for all we know, it could be empty, or merely contain design plans or unassembled parts, or even a talking cabbage. Without such evidence, your assertion that K-9 Mark II appears in that story is purely your own theory (ie. original research); Wikipedia is not an outlet for such speculation. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 15:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, but I'm not asserting anything about the box. That's the difference. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 15:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm saying that his first inarguable on-screen appearance is in The Ribos Operation. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 15:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And to repond to what you added while I was typing the above, so what? We see a box. It has the characters "K9 MII". We are teased with the possibilities of what it contains — a nice twist to the last episode of that season. But what we don't see is K-9 Mark II. The defence rests. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 15:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but where original research is concerned, there is no compromise. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 15:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the version you've now put in is not original research. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 18:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reporter / Newsreader 3 / US Newsreader

I've listed the above redirect for discussion. Can be found here. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 16:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alpha Centauri.jpg

Regarding the new upload: is this capped from the same serial and on the same date? I've adjusted the rationale to reflect which article it's for, but I obviously can't provide the other information. Cheers. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 19:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing that up. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 19:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woah there!

Could you please stop moving all episode images to the left! The MOS states images should be on the right, and moved down if they interfere with the infobox. I have raised it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who. — Edokter • Talk • 23:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Revenge (television drama)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sweet Revenge (television drama), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Sweet Revene (2001 Television drama). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 18:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Castellan

It was with interest that I noticed a link in the cast list of The Five Doctors for Paul Jerricho's role, the Castellan. Upon reading it, however, I must express concern, which I initially did on the programme's main article's talk page. A misreading of that resulted in Digby Tantrum's changing your work to a redirect to Arc of Infinity. Castellan is actually a job title, while your text implies it to be the character's name. Furthermore, it appears in two other, earlier stories, The Deadly Assassin and The Invasion of Time, held by at least one and probably two other Time Lords---two different actors are involved, and in the latter story, that Castellan is killed. So even if he is the same one from Assassin regenerated (I haven't seen Invasion in years), he still cannot be the one seen in Arc and Five played by Jerricho. The article is in need of major revision, but as I just conceded a lack of a good grip on the details of the latter of the two earlier serials, I should not be the one to do it. I am genuinely sorry that Digby so grossly misinterpreted my posting, as I have no objection to an accurate article on this topic. Ted Watson 19:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Digby Tantrum seems intent on eliminating this article, claiming to me "Neither the character nor the office meets notability guidelines for having a separate article." Compared to more than I care to count that do exist here, and given a rewrite to be about the position in general and covering all four stories, I can't see that. Just a heads up. Ted Watson 20:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Companions in Doctor Who Spinoffs

For info: I've deleted your entry for Georges-Pierre, and explained my reasoning here. Nothing personal, I just don't think it belongs there (or on Wikipedia, really). Phil PH 18:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:LesleySJA.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:LesleySJA.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Warriors of the Kudlak.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Warriors of the Kudlak.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Fear Her.jpg

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fear Her.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fasach Nua (talk) 15:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LesleySJA.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:LesleySJA.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SJA.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SJA.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who companions

Your text regarding the relative ages of actors has been removed. Sorry, but it is trivia, and not notable. (It also was essentially cut-and-pasted to multiple articles.) Please see the discussion at Talk:Donna Noble#Age regarding this matter. Thanks. --Ckatz^chat _spy 19:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ageism and Sexism

What one intends and what one does aren't always the same thing. You may not have intended to step on someone else's toes, but you've done so nonetheless. I'm just telling you to be cautious lest you meet someone who is rather passionate about the issue. DonQuixote (talk) 02:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I'm not trying to smear your reputation or whatever. I'm just saying that you have made an unintentionally sexist remark and I'm pointing it out before someone gets really offended. If you can't at least try to understand the other side, then I can't help you. Please try to understand that if the roles were reversed, that is a female protagonist with a male sidekick, no one would probably note the age difference. Please try to keep this in mind. DonQuixote (talk) 02:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[Ok, don't want to spend another thirty minutes trying to write a diplomatic response, so I'll just cut-and-pase.]

Quickly checking the edit history, I see that you've added the notes to Gerald Flood and John Barrowman on the 17th and 18th--after I pointed out how sexist it was to single out Catherine Tate. Oh wait, found one that predates that--Kamelion was edited in July. Wasn't that about the time Tate was announced? Up till now I just assumed it was an honest mistake, a simple faux paus, but you're starting to cast doubts on that.

Look, the point is that it was a small error. Everyone makes mistakes, so don't take it too personally. I wasn't casting judgment on you--hell, I was only criticising the statement in-and-of-iteself. I'm just saying that some people will find this little tiny thing offensive because Tate was noted first (and then all the males were retroactively included), so be careful. DonQuixote (talk) 21:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I'm not trying to make you out to be sexist--hence you made the offence unintentionally. I'm just cautioning you that some people will find the comment sexist. It's just a small faux pas that doesn't reflect on you. If I were to tell you that gazpacho soup is meant to be served cold and not hot, I'm not disparaging you. DonQuixote (talk) 15:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Traditionally, society dictated that women older than the protagonist were all to be maternal characters rather than companions, friends or love interests--this being reserved for younger women. Any deviation from that formula was considered to be unnatural. Conversely, it wasn't considered unnatural for men to have older friends or companions. Therefore, pointing out that Tate is older than Tennant, even innocently, emphasises it as being "unnatural". And that is why some people may find it sexist. DonQuixote (talk) 07:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably right, this argument will probably go nowhere. But the point remains that I didn't come to the defence of a male actor because I didn't have to. No one mentioned the fact that John Barrowman was older than Tennant when it was announced that he would return as a companion. Strangely enough, the issue only came up when Tate was announced as returning. These are the facts. You can do with them as you will. DonQuixote (talk) 05:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The WikiProject Doctor Who Award
		Wow - what an amazing amount of work done for the DW WikiProject! You have clearly shown hard work and dedication, so I think you deserve this. I, Michael Holloway, of sound mind and body, hereby award you with the Doctor Who WikiProject Barnstar - Weebiloobil (talk) 11:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Max Capricorn.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Max Capricorn.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Collector in his natural form.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Collector in his natural form.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Collector.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Collector.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Adeola Oshodi.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Adeola Oshodi.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fasach Nua (talk) 18:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The Collector in his natural form.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:The Collector in his natural form.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fasach Nua (talk) 23:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks so much! My very first barnstar! Very much appreciated. --Brian Olsen (talk) 17:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review for Astrid Peth

I'm just letting you know that I've begun my GA review for Astrid Peth. – sgeureka ^t•c 21:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Astrid Peth

An editor has nominated Astrid Peth, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrid Peth and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Evolution of the Daleks.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Evolution of the Daleks.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Shakespeare Code.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Shakespeare Code.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the WikiProject Doctor Who Assessment Committee

Wolf of Fenric...Thank you for agreeing to be part of the Assessment Committee of WikiProject Doctor Who. Please stop by the talk page to discuss how the articles will be assessed. To denote your participation in this committee on the main project page, you can use the following image next to your user name. Image:Gnome-searchtool blue.svg

Thank you for taking the time to assess these articles. - LA @ 22:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008

The Space-Time Telegraph

The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter

Issue 1

March 2008

Project News: We have five new participants: Sm9800, Seanor3, T saston, Type 40, Jammy0002.; One editor has left the project: StuartDD.; The Doctor Who portal has expanded to increase the number of selected stories to 33.

Articles of note

New featured articles

None

New featured article candidates

Voyage of the Damned (Doctor Who) (FAC)

New good articles

Delisted articles: None

Proposals: A proposal for changing the layout of the episode pages is under way here.; A discussion about the formatting of the cast lists in episode pages is under way here.; A discussion to move United Nations Intelligence Taskforce to UNIT is under way here.
News: The Torchwood project has become a task-force under the project's scope.; The Torchwood series 2 finale airs on 4th April, and the 4th series of Doctor Who will start to air on 5th April.

For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre ^(talk) 19:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have received this letter because you are on the newsletter recipients list. To opt-out, please remove your name.

Name of template for Doctor Who project

Hello there...Just fyi, the name of the project template is {{WikiProject Doctor Who}}, the other is just a redirect to it. - LA @ 22:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Last of the Time Lords.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Last of the Time Lords.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who pictures

Hello Wolf of Fenric. I see that you are busy adding pictures to Doctor Who articles, including some which the slaughter of a few months ago took away. I would like to suggest that you might want to add the word "above" to the phrase "as seen in the picture". I think it might help to explain what picture you are talking about. My thought is that some readers might think that you are talking about a pictures that might have been seen onscreen. I would also put the sentence in parentheses but that is just me. Please don't feel obligated to do this - it is only a suggestion. Let me just add many, many, many (is that enough yet?) (no let me just add one more) many thanks for getting pictures back into these articles. It is much appreciated!! MarnetteD | Talk 04:34, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the lateness of my reply it took me awhile to go back and find an example. If you look at the edit that I made here [1] you will see what I did back in March to try and rescue a picture. I hope that this helps and keep up the good work. MarnetteD | Talk 04:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G'day mate

How are ya? 61.68.76.4 (talk) 04:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Exit Wounds.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Exit Wounds.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wolf of Fenric, another user has deleted my embryonic article Professor River Song, saying she isn't deserving of her own article, yet Jenny appeared in only one episode and has got her own article. Can you either fold the Jenny article into the episode or reinstate my article? (Wordforge (talk) 19:26, 15 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

River Song - "companion"

Hi. I would love for you to chime in on this discussion. I've provided a wealth of sources, which are still being challenged by a couple of editors. Talk:Companion (Doctor Who)#A companion: by definition, and with reliable sources Thanks. —Shübop "Shadang" Âlang 15:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Companions EP vinyl cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Companions EP vinyl cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nyssa

Hi Wolf of Fenric. Thanks for your comment on the talk page for the DW project. I agree that the opening paragraph is correct but I asked the question because Phil moved her name from the guest cast section to the companion section of the infobox which I think is inaccurate. Just thought I would let you know to avoid confusion. Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 19:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The Family of Blood.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:The Family of Blood.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fasach Nua (talk) 14:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Novice Hame.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Novice Hame.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Adeola Oshodi.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Adeola Oshodi.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gatherer Hade.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gatherer Hade.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sergeant Mike Smith.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sergeant Mike Smith.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Marn.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Marn.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction of 'C' class articles

Hi. This is a cross-post to members of the Doctor Who assessment committee. Because of the introduction of the 'C' class, the general criteria for assessment has been changed. Please familiarise yourself with the new criteria and help migrate several Start- and B-Class articles into the C-Class category. Thank you! Sceptre ^(talk) 22:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Journey's End clips

Please stop. To be perfectly frank, what you are doing is nothing short of retarded. Those episodes are not references to the fact. They are list of of where the clips come from. You give no context as to what clips come from where or in which order they come (your edit summary doesn't count). Finally, it's over 6000 bytes to ref a single sentence. It's beyond unnecessary. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 07:26, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but like I said, I was being frank and you were fighting over including a block of references longer than the text itself. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 07:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Retarded" does have more than one meaning. It may not be PC, but it gets the job done. My comment is somewhat rude, butwhen you revert two different people to maintain your exhaustive list, it shows a lack of willingness to listen to simple edit summaries. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 07:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Though there are no majorities, when two different people revert you, WP:BRD would dictate stepping back to discuss, not staying the course. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 07:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Novice Hame.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Novice Hame.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. β^_command 05:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Marn.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Marn.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. β^_command 05:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Adeola Oshodi.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Adeola Oshodi.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. β^_command 05:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sergeant Mike Smith.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sergeant Mike Smith.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. β^_command 05:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Deleted images

The images were tagged as failing our Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria because they were non-free images in a list, which is typically considered to fail NFCC #8. In looking through the image's history, I notice that the image's tagger failed to notify you that he had tagged the images, and I do apologize on his behalf for that, but I believe the deletions were correct. Because of the confusion, though, I would not re-delete them if you were to upload them again. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prom article

Hi, Wolf. Mind if I take the {{underconstruction}} tag off of the Prom article? I'd like to submit it to DYK, but I'd rather present it as a more-or-less completed work. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 01:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who Prom

On 3 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Doctor Who Prom, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 14:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Spheres

I removed a lot less content than you think (340 words, most of them from the redundant continuity section). What I removed was:

Stuff about the use of "What? What? What?" - I don't think that's verifiable that it's become a catchphrase (because the inflection has changed each time, and you missed The Doctor's Daughter).
Letting down the defences - I didn't catch it when I was watching the clip, and I have a keen eye for detail because I watch Lost.
Water pistol - it's a "blink and you'll miss it" moment, like the Beethoven line.
The Feast of Steven - it's mostly conjecture.
Lack of a companion - is this verifiable that it's the third time?
The IMDB references; IMDB is unreliable, and the refs were superfluous.

The other stuff in the continuity section was relocated: the Graske's previous appearances went to the production, the fourth wall in the lead section (and the production, because interactive episodes always break the fourth wall), and reversing the polarity into the synopsis. Sceptre ^(talk) 17:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A request for help

As you're one of the best and hardest working contributors I've seen on Doctor Who articles (textual contributions), do you want to help out build the Doctor Who portal? It needs to have all the serial articles in the "selected story" section; I was thinking we could possibly do alternate seasons (i.e. I do season 4, you do season 5, etc). Sceptre ^(talk) 14:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 20:36, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Last Sontaran

Would you mind if I GA-review The Last Sontaran? I've previously reviewed Jenny (Doctor Who), which eventually passed, among numerous other GA articles. Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles suggests that those with "personal feelings about the merit of the article subject" should not review the aricle, but I do not consider myself one of these people. My only previous edit to this article is assessing it previously, as part of the Doctor Who assessment commitee - weebiloobil (talk) 20:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) - weebiloobil (talk) 06:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is currently on hold, pending minor improvements. See Talk:The Last Sontaran - weebiloobil (talk) 07:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Day of the Clown listed at RfD

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Day of the Clown. Since you had some involvement with the Day of the Clown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). -- Suntag ☼ 09:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Corporal Bell.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Corporal Bell.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bambera.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bambera.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Companions EP vinyl cover.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Companions EP vinyl cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 13:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christina_de_Souza.jpg

I have tagged File:Christina_de_Souza.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Christina de Souza.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Christina de Souza.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 20:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of celebrity and notable guest appearances in Doctor Who

There's a new AfD nomination for an article you've previously discussed. Please stop by to voice your opinions again. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 11:28, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christina de Souza.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christina de Souza.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Wolf of Fenric! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 41 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Mat Irvine - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Sharon Horgan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nosey Parker

A tag has been placed on Nosey Parker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Windchaser (talk) 23:25, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Star Trek

Hello, Wolf of Fenric, this message is being sent to inform you that, due to over two years editing inactivity, your username has been taken off of the list of Wikipedia Project Star Trek active conributers. If you have returned to active editing Wikipedia, please re add your name to the list of active contributers. Thank you, -- Alpha Quadrant (talk) 16:09, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Lady Christina de Souza

I have nominated Lady Christina de Souza, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Christina de Souza. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. magnius (talk) 15:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sylvia Noble.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sylvia Noble.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Francine Jones.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Francine Jones.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 06:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tish Jones.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tish Jones.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 07:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leo Jones.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leo Jones.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Clive Jones.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Clive Jones.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:13, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Gridlock.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gridlock.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:37, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Butterfly Person.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Butterfly Person.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christmas Invasion.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christmas Invasion.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 11:51, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bane TSJA.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Bane TSJA.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gorgon TSJA.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Gorgon TSJA.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who Yeti Article

Hey, I noticed your name was under the title "Assessment Committee" on the Doctor Who Wikiproject Assessment page and was just wondering if you had the time to offer your feedback on the recent changes made to the Yeti (Doctor Who) article. Any advice you can offer would be appreciated since I'm working to make the article shine as best as it can. Comics (talk) 11:01, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jackie Tyler.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jackie Tyler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nisha Nayar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nisha Nayar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nisha Nayar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010 • (talk) 21:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Space Pirates.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Space Pirates.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Redrose64 (talk) 08:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Awakening (Doctor Who).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Awakening (Doctor Who).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of All Star Family Fortunes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All Star Family Fortunes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Star Family Fortunes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 20:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Clyde Langer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Clyde Langer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fires of Pompeii.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fires of Pompeii.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fires of Pompeii.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fires of Pompeii.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sound of Drums.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sound of Drums.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shakespeare Code.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shakespeare Code.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Smith and Jones.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Smith and Jones.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragonfire.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dragonfire.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Terror of the Vervoids.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Terror of the Vervoids.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warriors of the Deep.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warriors of the Deep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Full Circle (Doctor Who).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Full Circle (Doctor Who).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kinda.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kinda.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Meglos.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Meglos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Snakedance.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Snakedance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:State of Decay.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:State of Decay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Time-Flight.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Time-Flight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warriors' Gate.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warriors' Gate.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Creature from the Pit.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Creature from the Pit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Face of Evil.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Face of Evil.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Horns of Nimon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Horns of Nimon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nightmare of Eden.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nightmare of Eden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Power of Kroll.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Power of Kroll.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ribos Operation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ribos Operation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Robots of Death.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robots of Death.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ambassadors of Death.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ambassadors of Death.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Day of the Daleks.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Day of the Daleks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Death to the Daleks screenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Death to the Daleks screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Monster of Peladon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Monster of Peladon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mutants (Doctor Who).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mutants (Doctor Who).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Time Monster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Time Monster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Enemy of the World.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Enemy of the World.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Faceless Ones.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Faceless Ones.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ice Warriors.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ice Warriors.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Krotons.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Krotons.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rare-fm-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rare-fm-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mat Irvine moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mat Irvine, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 08:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mat Irvine

Hello, Wolf of Fenric. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mat Irvine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alpha Centauri (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alpha Centauri (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Centauri (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 21:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Professor Edward Travers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Professor Edward Travers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professor Edward Travers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Castellan (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Castellan (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castellan (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 02:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of UNIT personnel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of UNIT personnel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UNIT personnel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 00:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alpha Centauri (Doctor Who) character appearance.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alpha Centauri (Doctor Who) character appearance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Doctor Who henchmen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Doctor Who henchmen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Doctor Who henchmen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 21:49, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adeola Oshodi.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adeola Oshodi.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of music featured on Doctor Who for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of music featured on Doctor Who is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of music featured on Doctor Who (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 17:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Fat Dancer" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Fat Dancer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 28 § Fat Dancer until a consensus is reached. TNstingray (talk) 16:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of The Sarah Jane Adventures minor characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Sarah Jane Adventures minor characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Sarah Jane Adventures minor characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jontesta (talk) 03:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brigadier (Doctor Who).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brigadier (Doctor Who).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]