User talk:WhatsTheTruth00

July 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Neile Adams, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 05:26, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Arnetia Walker. ----Rdp060707|talk 05:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Carly Simon. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You can't use ancestry search results per WP:DOB. Binksternet (talk) 22:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Family search.com is not reliable

Hi. Please do not add family search.com url links to Wikipedia per policy at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources.4meter4 (talk) 05:39, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just a general note that all ancestry websites are deemed unreliable, such as ancestry.com, family tree.com, etc. IMDB is also not considered reliable and is best used as an external link and not a source for article content. (See perennial sources policy above). Census information is in the public domain, so it should be possible to locate the original source on a government website or database. That we can use. Best.4meter4 (talk) 05:51, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WhatsTheTruth00, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WhatsTheTruth00! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bsoyka (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 21:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't open duplicate discussions. Don't open threads on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard and RFCs on the subjects' talk pages about the same issues. Meters (talk) 21:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This pertains to your issues on Carly Simon and Illeana Douglas. Splitting the discussions over two pages is just confusing and counter productive. Meters (talk) 21:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Penny Marshall. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. See WP:DOB and WP:BLPPRIMARY Meters (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Your editing has become disruptive. You will not be unblocked until you show that you understand what sorts of sources are acceptable for use in biographies of living people. Cullen328 (talk) 22:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]