User talk:WendyKrijgsman

Welcome!

Hello, WendyKrijgsman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 22:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Canadian Arctic Tundra has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Canadian Arctic Tundra. Thanks! Wikirictor (talk) 17:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Co-operation

Hello! I just had the honor to check your Draft:Canadian Arctic Tundra and made some comments on it. I am also interested in Geography and immediately liked your work provided here. Your have invested quite some time for it and have delivered a great amount of info - Thank you for that. However, i noticed you are probably new to Wikipedia - which is great!!! as your draft could use some technical, formal and stylistic tweaking and support. I would like to help you with that, if this is fine with you. If i don't hear from you i will certainly start editing the article very soon, because i really like the subject. Anyway, simply drop a note, any question, proposals, ideas, problems below here. I will watch the page and be glad to help. All the Best!!! Wikirictor (talk) 17:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canadian Arctic Tundra (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please fix the reference style on this article. Check the links above for help with how to format references. Once that is done, resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Canadian Arctic Tundra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 04:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! WendyKrijgsman, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bradv 04:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Canadian Arctic Tundra

Draft:Canadian Arctic Tundra, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Canadian Arctic Tundra and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Canadian Arctic Tundra during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Wikirictor (talk) 05:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]