User talk:Weissmann~enwiki

Saint Michael and Saint George

Before you start an edit war. What are your references for this pic? Selfmade? Read the articles: Saint Michael is known for and mostly displayed for his fight with the devil, Saint George killed a dragon. And your comment: look at the pic he got wings? In most pictures over the centuries angels have been displayed with wing. (Rough translation in German: Michel => Teufel, Georg => Drachen, und: viele Abbildungen von Engeln zeigen diese mit Flügeln) Have a nice day. Sebastian scha. (talk) 13:10, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Why should I start an edit war? Please be more careful with this. Holy George was a real person and not an angel. He is a martyr of the roman-catholic church. The "story" with the dragon is a legend. I guess the mosaic shows Michael. What do you think? Do you have other sources? Best --Weissmann (talk) 13:27, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

As far as I can tell Michael is usually depicted as in the picture you uploaded, so e.g. on the coat of arms of my hometown Jena. But the question I would like to raise is whether this pretty simple mosaic is important enough to be on the article of the archangel Michael. This is just another one of your attempts to make Balve more important than it is. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 14:04, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

You get me wrong, I am sorry. What do you think? Do have reliable sources for showing Saint George with wings in the past? Best --Weissmann (talk) 14:27, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

No, I think you get me wrong. I said that in my opinion your pic shows Michael. I have no idea what Saint George is supposed to look like. I just wanted to state that since there are already quite a few pictures in the article, another pic from Balve of not quite that much artistic value is not really necessary. Regards, Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 14:37, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, sorry for this. And I have missed the horse ... Best --Weissmann (talk) 14:40, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Hm, okay George's story is a legend, maybe Michael's also, but this is not the point. As Gunnar Heidrich pointed is it A) notable enough and like I said obove B) is it the artist's intention to show Michael? Maybe I'm wrong and Saint George (huh it's the title of this section) is never displayed with wings. I don't know, but you need to proove your point, so you can add this pic. Wikipedia is not "first adding" and "later give some references". Sebastian scha. (talk) 15:51, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry but I don't understand your objections. Wikipedia in my point of view is a "free encyclopedia". Work of art (I am sure a mosaic is such a kind of creative work) is notable enough for Wikipedia. Don't you agree? Best --Weissmann (talk) 06:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

That is the point. Please see : in general WP:N first, (for your articles about festspiele or composers e.g. WP:MUSIC), and then WP:NOBJ, because you need references (and here ref in English), which say so. It is the same for the German wiki. the conclusion is, not every little work of art is something to post in wikipedia. IMHO it would be better to expand the article of the location Balve first, with sections about music, churches etc., including references. And from there try to write a real new article. The references is not: It is excisting so it is notable, it's the other way: Somebody (not you or the press staff) write about it (in an independent source (WP:INDY) and then you can edit it here. Example try to find a newspaper article in English (no blog, myspace ...) about Balver Festspiele and post this lemma with this reference. Or a little easier find information about the number of inhabitants in Balve and make a professional section of demographics. You and your camera is no source, see WP:NOR. That's how wiki work. Sebastian scha. (talk) 07:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

For me it is a notable work of art. You disagree. I hope we will find a solution. What is your suggestion? Best --Weissmann (talk) 07:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

You are not important. You don't get it? ... breath, count, read wp:civil ... You are not the person to say it is notable. The guideline say: find a ref (independent, second source ...) and then it could be notable. Not, there is a church next door with a mosaic and you've taken a picture, find an article in a newspaper or an artbook (better) and then post it in wikipedia. This is the guideline (WP:N), which you really really really at all costs should read. Sebastian scha. (talk) 07:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't matter if you or I are important or not. The question is: Is this work of art important? For me and for others it is. Best --Weissmann (talk) 08:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

And why of all the thousands of depictions of the archangel Michael does it have to be the mosaic from Balve that has to be added to the already richly pictured article? Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 08:15, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

How many mosaics can you discover there? --Weissmann (talk) 08:20, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, maybe you have got a paper collage of him as well? Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 08:22, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Next try: You wrote above:

The question is: Is this work of art important? For me and for others it is.

— User:Weissmann

And that's the point: You are NOT reliable in this matter. If the others are writers in an art book or history book, it's okay. If the others are the minister of the parish or the president of the Heimatbund, it is not okay. (Note: the English wiki is much more strict than the German wiki, and "but in article xxx somebody did this" is no argument.) Sebastian scha. (talk) 08:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

What about me and others? Best --Weissmann (talk) 10:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Campingkirche

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Campingkirche, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 14:06, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

See the article's talk page. I do not know anything about it but what I can find on the internet says at least that it was not founded in the 80s and that it was no idea of the Paderborn archdiocese. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 14:17, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

There is no need to discuss this threetimes. Best --Weissmann (talk) 14:22, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Frank Butterweck, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JD554 (talk) 07:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Period? --Weissmann (talk) 07:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

That would be up to whichever admin blocked you. --JD554 (talk) 07:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I hope I will fulfill you specification. Kind regards --Weissmann (talk) 07:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

House concert

I do not appreciate you calling my edit vandalism as you did here. Can I suggest you read WP:PROVEIT which says that the burden of proof is on you for adding the information. Do not re-add unless you can cite a reliable source. --JD554 (talk) 08:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Best --Weissmann (talk) 08:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to House concert. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JD554 (talk) 08:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

What about the history section? I guess it is important. Best --Weissmann (talk) 08:22, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand what you are asking. --JD554 (talk) 08:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Please let me know it a history section is needed at House concert. Best --Weissmann (talk) 08:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

A history section may be useful, but any additions must comply with WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:SPS and WP:V. --JD554 (talk) 08:27, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Do you think a Wikipedia article doe snot comply with this? --Weissmann (talk) 08:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Lots of Wikipedia articles don't comply with those policies/guidelines. But that doesn't mean the problem should be allowed to get worse. --JD554 (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

I agree. But Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart seems to be an example of good work. Best --Weissmann (talk) 10:23, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

So? --JD554 (talk) 11:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Image deleted

Hi, I have deleted Image:Weissmann Werner Ahrens 2008.jpg as a copyright violation, because the license stated that you had created the work yourself, which was clearly not the case. Kevin (talk) 08:23, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Best --Weissmann (talk) 08:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Klaus Lücke

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Klaus Lücke, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JD554 (talk) 11:22, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Campingkirche

I have nominated Campingkirche, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campingkirche. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JD554 (talk) 11:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Minor edits

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Please learn from your mistakes. JD554 (talk) 12:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Best --Weissmann (talk) 13:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Quite clearly you do not learn by your mistakes - your very next edit after writing "OK" here was this and it was marked as a minor edit. That is wrong because you added information to the article. Please click on "my preferences" near the top right of the page, then select "Editing", make sure there is not a tick in "Mark all edits minor by default" and click the "Save" button. --JD554 (talk) 14:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

In my opinion it was a minor edit. Sorry. Best --Weissmann (talk) 14:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Your opinion is wrong. Wikipedia says: signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous version: typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content [my bold], et cetera. Please read Help:Minor edit and stop marking what Wikipedia considers to be major edits as minor. --JD554 (talk) 14:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Oops, believe it or not - no purpose -> Klaus Lücke. Sorry. Best --Weissmann (talk) 10:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Oops, I did it again. Done automatically on my page. Best --Weissmann (talk) 10:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Schön scharf machen bitte

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Schön scharf machen bitte, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JD554 (talk) 14:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wilder Westen

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wilder Westen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JD554 (talk) 14:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Typo redirect Hartmann (band)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hartmann (band), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hartmann (band) is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hartmann (band), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fbh 2006 links.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fbh 2006 links.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fbh 2006 rechts.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fbh 2006 rechts.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann Hartmann 1992 CD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann Hartmann 1992 CD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Purvu 1992.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Purvu 1992.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JD554 (talk) 10:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Translate

Hi, can you please translate what is written here below the three separate images. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Dear Oc, I am busy. It will take a little while. Best --Weissmann (talk) 07:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann Faschisten raus.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann Faschisten raus.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Please use English

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:Bubo bubo and User:Homo lude in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 13:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks.Would you prefer a translation? Best --Weissmann (talk) 09:05, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes I would. The talk page guidelines above say you should if you need to converse in another language. --JD554 (talk) 17:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sauerländer Heimatbund

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sauerländer Heimatbund, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sauerländer Heimatbund. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sebastian scha. (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Seb, thank for your note. It's done. Best --Weissmann (talk) 09:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

No, it's not done - you just added a comment on the article's talk page. No one is going to notice it there. If you want to participate in the deletion discussion you have to comment at WP:Articles for deletion/Sauerländer Heimatbund. If you do so, please mention that you are the article's creator. Regards, Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 09:25, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, maybe it will take a little while. I've added a magazin cover to illustrate the notability. Best --Weissmann (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

This article was tagged long enough. You were busy adding and editing other articles and improved Heimatbund not a bit. Maybe you should concentrate your edits to a realy notable lemma. (Sorry I'm no native speaker, this may sound a little rude.) Sebastian scha. (talk) 16:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jens Müller (actor)

A tag has been placed on Jens Müller (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. JD554 (talk) 16:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann Hartmann 1996 CD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann Hartmann 1996 CD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Campingkirche logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Campingkirche logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Weissmann Bollmann 1996 CD.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Weissmann Bollmann 1996 CD.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 07:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC) --JD554 (talk) 07:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Music in Märkischer Kreis

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Music in Märkischer Kreis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 15:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann Tchaikovsky op64.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann Tchaikovsky op64.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Mill hagen1.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mill hagen1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kevin (talk) 22:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC) --Kevin (talk) 22:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

Weissmann, I have noticed you using other accounts, which would possibly not be a problem except that you are using them to avoid scrutiny and to give the appearance of others supporting your edits. Before I launch a case at the suspected sockpuppets noticeboard I would like to give you a chance to come clean and pick one account to use. Accounts I believe are yours are:

• User:Franz Kappes
• User:Sunsister
• User:Garbecker
• User:Erdwerkel

Possibly there are others I have not uncovered yet. What do you think? Kevin (talk) 23:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Links:

• List of sockets on dewiki (nearly all banned)
• The 5 I got on commons; CU was made there

Regards, abf /talk to me/ 12:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Geraldine McGowan

A tag has been placed on Geraldine McGowan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. JD554 (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Geraldine McGowan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Geraldine McGowan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JD554 (talk) 20:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Weissmann for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Kevin (talk) 23:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Iserlohn

Schamlos --Bubo 容 19:36, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

I have blocked this account for 2 months for sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Weissmann. You may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|YOUR REASON HERE}} below. Kevin (talk) 02:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mill_hagen1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mill_hagen1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Nard 21:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Holy_mass.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Holy_mass.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Nard 21:37, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Lisa_Grefe.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lisa_Grefe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Weissmann Stephan.jpg

Image:Weissmann Stephan.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Weissmann FBH 2005 Stephan.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Weissmann FBH 2005 Stephan.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 05:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann Spliff 1984 CD2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann Spliff 1984 CD2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Weissmann Spliff 1984 CD2.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann Spliff 1984 CD2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 23:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

File:Weissmann FBH 2005 Felix.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Weissmann FBH 2005 Felix.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Weissmann Enya Horse.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Weissmann Enya Horse.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Weissmann Mitteregger 1990.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Weissmann Mitteregger 1990.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Weissmann! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 939 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Herwig Mitteregger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sundern-Sorpesee2-Asio.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Sundern-Sorpesee2-Asio.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:21, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Weissmann Thomas-D 2001 CD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Weissmann Thomas-D 2001 CD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Michael (Archangel)

Category:Michael (Archangel), which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Weissmann Spliff 1984 CD.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Weissmann Spliff 1984 CD.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:29, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Weissmann Werner Traud.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Weissmann Werner Traud.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Live in der Balver Höhle

The article Live in der Balver Höhle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No establishment of notability (see WP:NALBUMS); no article about theband who recorded this (see WP:RED)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gyrofrog (talk) 22:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Weissmann. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Weissmann~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

03:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

20:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Partnerschule listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Partnerschule. Since you had some involvement with the Partnerschule redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sillium 1998.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Sillium 1998.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Weissmann Pippi 2001.jpg
• File:Weissmann Robin 1995.jpg
• File:Weissmann Wedekind book.jpg

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Weissmann Strotmann.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Weissmann Strotmann.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lakaien 1999.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lakaien 1999.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Weissmann klaus luecke.jpg

The file File:Weissmann klaus luecke.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Weissmann Hagen 2001.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Weissmann Hagen 2001.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Weissmann Balve 1982 MV.jpg

The file File:Weissmann Balve 1982 MV.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, low quality, use File:Weissmann Balve 1982 MV Balve.jpg instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Weissmann FBH 2005 Ens2.jpg

The file File:Weissmann FBH 2005 Ens2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, low quality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 06:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I've moved some (or all) of your files uploaded here to Wikimedia Commons. What files are those exactly? See here. --TheImaCow (talk) 06:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

"Little Hobbit" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Little Hobbit and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 31 § Little Hobbit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 17:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)