User talk:We all love Mississippi

August 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Greg Davis (Mississippi politician)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 23:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Pennsylvania gubernatorial election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 00:09, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 21:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents. Pawnkingthree (talk) 21:58, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

We all love Mississippi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia is known as the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. If I am blocked, Wikipedia fails to reflect its reputation as an encyclopedia that anyone can edit.-We all love Mississippi (talk) 22:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I know you're trolling, but "anyone can edit" doesn't mean "anyone is allowed to edit". -- Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 22:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]