User talk:WashingtonianHuk
WashingtonianHuk, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi WashingtonianHuk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 9 May 2017 (UTC) |
The article The Final Mission of Extortion 17 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subject fail WP:BKBRIT and WP:GNG. The airspacemag and smithsonian links are both linked to the publisher. The BEFORE search indicated only mere mentions like this or websites selling the book.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:20, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of The Final Mission of Extortion 17 for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Final Mission of Extortion 17 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Final Mission of Extortion 17 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
The Final Mission of Extortion 17
[edit]I have reverted you. A deletion discussion concluded that the subject is not notable. it is not for you to act otherwise. You are a single-purpose account. If you persist I will take you to a drama board. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Final Mission of Extortion 17
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Final Mission of Extortion 17, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)