Jump to content

User talk:Wabulton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


August 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to South Yorkshire Police has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at South Yorkshire Police. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 00:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Henlord12. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mayor of Portland, Oregon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Henlord12 (talk) 20:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mayor of Portland, Oregon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Megxit, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Megxit. Sundayclose (talk) 00:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Megxit shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wabulton. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Your unacceptable behavior includes BLP violations, disruptive editing, edit warring and POV pushing. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete warnings and other valid content from your talk page without justification. —8enTalk    16:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@BenYaMan: An editor may remove most talk page content from their own talk page, including warnings. See WP:OWNTALK. Sundayclose (talk) 17:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you; my previous belief of what the policy was was apparently unfounded. —8enTalk    17:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]