User talk:Wabulton
August 2020[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to South Yorkshire Police has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: South Yorkshire Police was changed by Wabulton (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876401 on 2020-08-28T23:50:22+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at South Yorkshire Police. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 00:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Henlord12. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mayor of Portland, Oregon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Henlord12 (talk) 20:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
September 2020[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mayor of Portland, Oregon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mayor of Portland, Oregon was changed by Wabulton (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930618 on 2020-09-04T10:39:33+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Megxit, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Megxit. Sundayclose (talk) 00:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Megxit shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wabulton. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. - Your unacceptable behavior includes BLP violations, disruptive editing, edit warring and POV pushing. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Do not delete warnings and other valid content from your talk page without justification. —8enTalk 16:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- @BenYaMan: An editor may remove most talk page content from their own talk page, including warnings. See WP:OWNTALK. Sundayclose (talk) 17:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)