Jump to content

User talk:Vulsu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Vulsu! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 21:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kumar wadhwani has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_oywl1f8czta/sg3gbqjdl1i/aaaaaaaaadk/pmvlapgrosq/s1600-h/kumar+wadhwani.jpg, http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_oywl1f8czta/sg3gbqjdl1i/aaaaaaaaadk/pmvlapgrosq/s1600-h/kumar+wadhwani.jpg (redirect from http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_oywl1f8czta/sg3gbqjdl1i/aaaaaaaaadk/pmvlapgrosq/s1600-h/kumar+wadhwani.jpg)). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Kumar wadhwani has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. StormRider 22:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Kumar wadhwani. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. StormRider 15:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Kumar wadhwani has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. StormRider 15:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Akshay Kumar. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 15:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Kumar Wadhwani.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kumar Wadhwani.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Vulsu! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Kumar Wadhwani - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jhoom Barabar Jhoom 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Title not withstanding, this does not appear to be a sequel to Jhoom Barabar Jhoom. Instead, it is an inferior article about the exact same film and should therefore be deleted. Redirecting would merely be confusing.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Favonian (talk) 11:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mundiya to Bachke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

At the very best, this is WP:CRYSTAL. IMDb has no entry for it, and web searches only come up with some YouTube and ringtone downloads.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Favonian (talk) 11:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kumar Wadhwani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is based on his parts in two movies, but their articles have both been nominated for deletion as probable hoaxes. There are no sources documenting that he received the awards mentioned.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Favonian (talk) 11:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]