User talk:Vkritis
|
The article Lefteris Hapsiadis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The article appears to fail the WP:AUTHOR guidelines. I find no matches on Google Books and no matches on WorldCat under the English or Greek names. There are no matches on Google News or Google Scholar and the article makes no claims to significance in terms of literary awards or anything meaningful against the notability guidelines for authors.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fæ (talk) 12:46, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit]
Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 13:00, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Note there is also the option of requesting WP:USERFICATION of a challenged article. The benefit being that you can take your time drafting and get feedback (say, from WP:RFF) before re-releasing the article. Please use the {{helpme}} template should you wish to take this route. Thanks, Fæ (talk) 13:02, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]I'll put your deleted text here.
Bear in mind I'm also a frequent financial contributor to and vocal promotor in college for my students of Wikipedia. — Doesn't get you special treatment, I'm afraid.
I'm sure your motives are good, but the tone of the article are hagiographic. Let's look at the claims made in just the first paragraph, without supporting independent verifiable sources.
- many of which became classics
- largely adored by the Greek public of all ages
- some of the best rebetika and popular music songs
- an exceptional CD
- still performed by the vast majority of the most popular singing performers
This and the rest of the article read as if written by his agent or music publisher. It's supposed to be a neutral encyclopaedia article, not a glowing review. Has he or his works never attracted a hostile review? As an academic, you should be aware of the importance of sourcing and neutrality, not promoting a particular point of view.
In his long career as a lyrics writer, Hapsiadis achieved a number of Golden and Platinum record awards — an independent ref for that should establish notability
Hope this helps, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
More
[edit]Thanks for asking me to take another look. I've made a few mainly technical edits. I think you may have missed the [] around the reference examples I gave, I've fixed the first one to hide the url, but the others need the brackets added.
The tone is much better, although part of para 3 of Life is a bit glowing For a short time... considered as one of the best Greek lyrics writers of the last century... the rising star composer C... legendary... one of the most prominent novel writers the country has seen in recent years. ... widely famous....
The article as a whole is very short of references. Biographies of living people must be referenced, but there are no references for most of the facts about his life, and the current references are mainly to things like CDs and song lyrics, not to his life history. You must have got your facts from somewhere, let us know. He is a gold record artist, there must surely be some reference for that? As it stands, I don't think the article is safe from listing for deletion either as an unsourced biography of a living person, or WP:OR. If you look at, say Celestiial, it's not particularly heavily referenced, compared to something like Aaliyah, but it gives sources for the main facts
Hope this helps, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:39, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- I think that it looks better now, although I'm not sure that a discussion with close friends is RS!. The article space isn't protected, so if there is nothing more to add, you can just move or cut and paste to Lefteris Hapsiadis Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:33, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:HapsiDalaras.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HapsiDalaras.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:50, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Hapsikaza.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Hapsikaza.jpg, which you've attributed to Lefteris Hapsiadis. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —innotata 07:42, 12 July 2018 (UTC)