User talk:Viztor/Archive 1

Archive 1

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tracktesttemplate

Template:Tracktesttemplate has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jalen D. Folf (talk • contribs) 02:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aaron Swartz

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aaron Swartz you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ethanpet113 -- Ethanpet113 (talk) 04:20, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aaron Swartz

The article Aaron Swartz you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aaron Swartz for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ethanpet113 -- Ethanpet113 (talk) 09:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aaron Swartz

The article Aaron Swartz you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Aaron Swartz for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ethanpet113 -- Ethanpet113 (talk) 21:02, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Third Circuit Court of the Supreme People's Court

Hello, Viztor,

Thanks for creating Third Circuit Court of the Supreme People's Court! I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

You provided no sources independent of the subject and the article makes no claim of notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chris Troutman (talk) 18:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Blanking of Penal system in China

Hello, I reverted your blanking of Penal system in China as a non-constructive end run past AfD guidelines. You brought the article to AfD. Let the participants in the discussion form a consensus. If you disagree with the !votes to keep, please make a policy-based rebuttal. Final reminder: the AfD tag says, "Feel free to improve the article, but the article must not be blanked." • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

@Gene93k: I'm actually in the process of rewriting it, so it would be nice if you could revert your revert so I don't have to. As you can see, I've already rewritten the skeleton of article, and I plan to fill in parts gradually over the next few hours, thanks. Viztor (talk) 16:18, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

• In that case, rewrite the article in your sandbox or in a subpage until it is ready to be published. If you intend to rewrite the article, please consider withdrawing the AfD nomination. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

• Gotcha. Will do.Viztor (talk) 16:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
• @Gene93k: BTW, how exactly should I withdraw an AFD nomination, I'm not seeing it on the guide. Thanks. Viztor (talk) 16:57, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

• The easiest way is to state you wish to withdraw the nomination at the AfD debate. You may want to strike (but don't remove) your original deletion rationale. Please also state that you are working on a new draft at Draft:Penal system in China. An admin or any uninvolved editor can then do a speedy close on the AfD as withdrawn. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on China–United States trade war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Syopsis (talk) 01:51, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

You're not welcome to use the warning template when you have clearly not read the talk page. Viztor (talk) 01:55, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

I have read the talk page for that article and it is clear from your actions there and on the main article that you are edit warring. It isn't obvious to you because you don't know how this encyclopedia works - people don't just remove heaps of material that have been sitting there for months on end without even discussing it on the talk page first. Syopsis (talk) 02:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Edit War Warning

Your recent editing history at China–United States trade war shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hari147 (talk) 07:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Unconstructive editing-You have been warned

Hi there-I see that you are taking this to a personal level.Only fair and reasonable edits will be permitted.Your articles seem to be pro-Chinese and seem to be of a biased fashion.We should try our best to keep Wikipedia a common grounds for edits and based on facts,rather than towing towards ideology.You have been warned by several users about your edits to China–United_States_trade_war.Any further disruptive actions may lead to a further ban to your editing privileges.Thank you. Hari147 (talk) 10:36, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

@Hari147:Without evidence, those accusations you made is a blatant attack on my character, numerous editors have pointed out and participated in the discussion about the neutrality of the article in the talk page over fairly long period of time, while instead of participating in these discussions, you choose to revert any edits that "you think" is "pro-Chinese". While you may feel especially proud expressing your POV, the truth is truth, and you can not hide it by reverting others' edits. I'm finding it difficult to respect your actions. Viztor (talk) 11:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of countries by incarceration rate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Public Security (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Viztor, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to National Railway Administration have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: List of functions on official website is not copyright-protected. Viztor (talk) 20:02, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

The site I found it on (http://english.gov.cn/state_council/2014/10/01/content_281474991089722.htm) is marked at the bottom as "Copyright© www.gov.cn All rights reserved. Without written authorization from www.gov.cn, such content shall not be republished or used in any form." So yeah, it does enjoy copyright protection. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk)

National Railway Administration moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, National Railway Administration, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:25, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Syopsis (talk) 21:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Montenegrin Guitar Duo

Hello Viztor. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Montenegrin Guitar Duo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: having two notable members is sufficient for notability per WP:BAND#6, so it's certainly a sufficient claim to pass A7. Thank you. SoWhy 09:55, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

I don't understand this. I just would like to know how to request a re-evaluation of my article on Hugo Gottesmann. Thank you ~~AS~~

New Page Review

Hey, I saw your request thread for NPP permissions. Another way that you may be able to demonstrate your knowledge of this criteria would be to participate in WP:AfD discussions, as there you would be making arguments about whether a given article should be kept or deleted (or another action). An advantage of demonstrating your knowledge through AfD is that it's a more collaborative environment than tagging new articles for speedy deletion, so it will be easier to learn the kind of arguments and inclusion-criteria that are important. The penalty for mistakes is also lower, since you'll just be one voice in a conversation. I'm not an admin and can't grant NPP permissions, but I am one of the most active patrollers right now, and I personally feel that having a solid track record at AfD can help make a good case for being granted NPR permissions. Not watching the page, ping me if you need anything _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC) @Rosguill: Thanks a lot for the advice. I will see what to do about that. You're awesome :) Viztor (talk) 14:22, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hangzhou Museum moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hangzhou Museum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Forbidden City into Palace Museum. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:03, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa:Duly noted. thanks for the reminder. 12:33, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Forbidden City

Sorry for all the pings recently, but thank you so much for your work on Forbidden City articles. I've been waiting for someone to work on stubs for many of the buildings since I visited Beijing back in 2016 and struggled to find articles about all the sites I saw. BTW, I uploaded my pics here: commons:User:Another Believer/Beijing. I left a few more questions on the template talk page, when you have a moment. Thanks again! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:32, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

@Another Believer: Yeah, I'm also working on the Forbidden City articles recently. And I will make sure to check your suggestions later. The official website of the Palace Museum has a [Map] and introductions, which could be of great help if you want to create some articles on its building. I will be more than glad to add them to the templates when I saw one :)Viztor (talk) 21:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Wow, this map is super helpful. I will definitely review my photographs and see if I can see which buildings are still missing articles. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

:) @Another Believer: Also, on the question of the river, it seems they are connected though I'm still trying to find credible sources saying so. I will make sure to do some more digging. Viztor (talk) 21:52, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Viztor, Wonderful, thank you. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:53, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

No problem :) Viztor (talk) 22:17, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of the Jean Orry article

Hello Viztor - I note that most of your editing on Wikipedia has been in the past few months. It is always good to see occasional editors take the leap and become more involved. The nomination you made for the Jean Orry article came to my attention because I just happen to watch the talk page of the editor who first drafted the article.

I see that you've made several nominations for deletion in recent weeks. Some are likely to result in deletion, but several are being kept pretty quickly. A few suggestions to help you discern which are most likely to be deleted:

• If there are articles on the same subject in several other languages (particularly if they are on "large" Wikipedias, like French, Spanish, German, Italian), then it is likely the subject is going to meet the notability standard and is not a good candidate for deletion. English Wikipedia has probably the lowest notability standard of all the large Wikipedias.
• Make sure that you have carried out a solid Google and Google Book search before nominating, especially for historical subjects. It took seconds to discover additional sources for the Orry article.
• Follow the deletion discussions for a few days' worth of articles. Read the articles involved, perhaps participate in the discussions. When the AfDs are closed, take a look at which ones resulted in delete, keep or other outcomes. This will help you to identify what kinds of articles are likely to be deleted, and how best to present your deletion argument.

I hope you find this helpful. It's challenging to get involved in some of the "behind the curtain" activities at Wikipedia, but you're making plenty of useful contributions and I'd be sad if you found it discouraging when others don't agree with your proposals. All the best, Risker (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

@Risker: Thank you very much for the kind reminder. I should have checked those. Though the thing that triggered me the first place was the fact it had no valid citation or reference, books and url etc., I'm not exactly sure what to do with these. Should we just leave them like that? Some of the historical figures on zhwiki got AfD nominated because they only have a single source. I will make sure to check more thoroughly next time, and again thanks for the notice. Viztor (talk) 18:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

I'll chime in here to add that it looks like you are being too hasty on your deletion nominations as well. Just looking at some of your recent nominations, I noticed that you nominated Adele Uddo for deletion only 45 minutes after it was created, and you nominated Mactan-Cebu International Airport Terminal 2 only an hour and 20 minutes after it was created. Deletion doesn't have to be a race, please consider giving the article creators a few days to expand articles as they create them before nominating them for deletion or pasting a bunch of article improvement templates on them (not that I've noticed you doing that second thing). RecycledPixels (talk) 16:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

@RecycledPixels:Some article just won't do if it is not notable, if it is, it won't be difficult to find anything about it. Time created may increase the quality of the article, but i don't think it will raise the notability. however, I appreciate the notice and believe waiting for sometime before XfD can be helpful when asserting on notability. thanks. Viztor (talk) 20:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

I know I am biased in this since I created one of the articles you have nominated for deletion (I am genuinely curious how you came across it, based on your stated interests on your front page), but for what it's worth, I am not surprised that others feel you are being too hasty in your deletion nominations, for reasons I discuss more fully on the discussion page for the deletion of One Night (2009 film). I am not sure if you yet appreciate that different topics have different criteria, both in terms of rigour (e.g. medical RS are a lot tougher than regular RS) and verifiability. So, just because you don't recognize a film's awards as internationally important, for example, is not a reason to delete the film article: do all films with articles on WP have awards? No. Do they help? Sure. Necessary? No. Coverage by secondary sources is the bare standard for general notability as well as verifiability. The article may not have many (and I've added one since) but it does have them.ZarhanFastfire (talk) 00:38, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

@ZarhanFastfire:At first, I thought this might be a niche award known to the industry, so I did some more digging. It is clear as day few if any recognize this award as world-class. It bestow awards in 200 categories, which means each year there will be at least 600 people getting the awards. A majority of those who applied will get an award. It is hilarious.Viztor (talk) 11:35, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

I suggest you read WP:IDIDN'THEARTHAT. You are so fixated on what awards a film has and whether they are "world class", that you seem to think having an award that isn't world class (whatever that means) is grounds for deletion of an article; that it's a reflection on the film itself and somehow negates any other of its (the article's) aspects. I don't know which one you're referring to; the Houston festival has been around since the 60s. I don't know how you arrive at the conclusion that the majority of those who "applied" get an award. That's not how it works. They don't apply for a specific award, which you'd know if you read a few dozen articles on filmmaking or awards or even just film articles by now. Films in competition are selected by the festival and then nominated for specific awards, which are not doled out as "you get one, you get one, you get one". What sources do you have to cite that tell us how many films were in competition for this or that award and that almost everyone got one? And what does this have to do with what I brought to your attention? You are not addressing the issues,so I'm done arguing with you. Good luck with your other WP edits. From what others are telling you, you would be wise to work on making positive contributions to WP rather than wasting everyone's time trying to delete so many articles until you have more experience. Just my advice, for what it's worth. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 18:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

That's not what I said. You're the one brought up awards as criteria, so I have to argue on that. Viztor (talk) 18:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

I may have brought it up here, but it was in response to you making use of the awards as an argument for deleting the article. It was one of the two arguments you made.ZarhanFastfire (talk) 03:07, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

ANI report

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 05:56, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft HSFC

Thanks. I've initially added the content from the official website of ISRO in my own words. However, the page got deleted due to 'copyright' reason. That's why I created this page now with minimal content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esamueljohnson (talk • contribs) 05:19, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

@Esamueljohnson: You're absolutely welcome. BTW, don't forget to sign your comment with ~~~~ so people are aware of the context. Enjoy your wiki experience. Viztor (talk) 23:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Viztor! You created a thread called Do we allow articles for planned metro line? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:28, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Warning users

This seemed a little WP:BITE-y to me. Yes, it was vandalism, but sometimes new editors just mess around to see how things work. {{welcomevandal}} is an appropriate way to steer a brand new user away from vandalism and encourage them to contribute constructively.

If they keep doing it repeatedly, then we can lower the boom. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

@Drm310:I sure see the point, however, I doubt the innocence when he changed someone's name to Adolf Hitler, that's why I warned. I'm certainly ok if it's just some random texts or self introduction or anything really.Viztor (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Viztor, it's not about innocence. It could've been a stupid joke to them. I would recommend just using the {{uw-vandalism1}} (or {{uw-vandalism2}} for situations like this, I guess) template instead of typing out an original reply. That's my own preference because I only use {{welcomevandal}} when I think a vandal might not be a repeat offender.
This creates a natural step for escalation towards {{uw-vandalism4}} which gives cause to report to WP:AIV. That's just me, though. (talk page stalker) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:47, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

@MJL:Thank you for your valuable input. I really appreciate it.Viztor (talk) 02:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Non-admin closure of Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/David_Simchi-Levi

Hi Viztor. While I agree that this AFD was unlikely to go anywhere other than keep, I believe you may have acted improperly in closing it as you did for three reasons:

1. The most obvious is that you !voted keep and then closed it. That means you are not uninvolved, and WP:NACINV is very clear that non-admin (and indeed admin) closures should be done by non-involved parties. At AFD, that surely means someone who did not !vote.
2. A second point is that WP:SNOW specifically states that the clause should not be applied simply because it is an 'uphill battle'. User:Huon was still actively debating and disagreeing with the keep voters and there is legitimate debate to be had about the WP:NPROF criteria. The article had avoided the AFC process and been nominated (and declined) for a speedy deletion, so surely that suggests there is some kind of debate worth having about it, that should not be shut down as WP:SNOW. The AFD had only been open for a couple of days and it is possible (though certainly unlikely) that consensus could have swung the other way.
3. I'd have had less of an issue with an admin or very experienced editor making the snow closure, but you are relatively new to AFDs and do not exactly exactly have a perfect record in this area.

I'm not going to undo your closure myself as that is probably verging on WP:POINTy, but I wouldn't entirely blame Huon if they wished to do so. Hugsyrup (talk) 17:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

@Hugsyrup: You're right, I do see that the proposer is still trying, and hence have reverted the closure. Although I do not think your first point and third point is valid, I do believe we can keep that difference.Viztor (talk) 18:36, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Meh. I'd say most of the current !votes should be disregarded by the closer because they just provide one of the arguments to avoid or another (including Viztor's own), with one blatant misrepresentation of WP:NACADEMIC thrown in for good measure. The author is one of the few contributors who have made arguments towards notability beyond mere assertions (I should have said right in the nomination that "his h-index of 65 is pitifully low and clearly establishes his non-notability"; I have no idea whether that's true and cannot provide evidence, but hey, that's apparently not required). Since apparently for a sufficiently narrow definition of "his subject area" (does any reliable secondary source confirm that that's his subject area?) the journals whose editor-in-chief he was and is indeed are "major, well-established academic journal[s] in their subject area", so he probably gains automatic notability and we can dispense with such bothersome policies as WP:PST. OK, rant mode off. Viztor, I'd strongly suggest that you consider again what Hugsyrup said about WP:NACINV; long, long ago I learned that lesson when I was brought to AN/I for having closed a move discussion to which I had contributed. There are very few occasions when a contributor can close a discussion; this certainly wasn't one of them. Huon (talk) 20:34, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Wrongly accepted edit

Why would you accept this change?! Please be careful. Check the history page, etc. before accepting an unexplained change by an anonymous IP. Thanks. Musdan77 (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

@Musdan77: Change review is in place to counter obvious vandalism, and occasionally prevent edit warring, not to exam the correctness every change IP users' make, that is the job for the wiki process. Thanks. Viztor (talk) 19:26, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

But, you didn't follow the "wiki process"! (as you put it.) If you had accepted the change, then checked, you would have reverted your acceptance. So, I had to revert it, which made your acceptance worthless. This was vandalism. How did you determine it wasn't? You have to find out. Most pages that are protected is because of vandalism by anonymous IPs. And I had just added a reference because of this IP (different address but obviously the same person). Furthermore, if you had taken the time to check my edit count page you'd have seen that I have been a reviewer for 5 years, so... Musdan77 (talk) 22:44, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

How is a change of "voss" to "ross" vandalism? Unless there is indicated edit warring, I'm obligated to accept in this situation.Viztor (talk) 22:47, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

The first time can be assumed a good faith edit (mistake), but the second time, especially after an editor adds a reference proving the correct way, then it's obvious vandalism. Okay? --Musdan77 (talk) 17:54, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

That's not true and at its best a terrible definition. Involved in an edit dispute does not mean an editors on neither side is a vandal. Otherwise, we would not have a noticeboard on 3RR for that everyone would be banned for vandalism before they breach the code. You really should not jump to conclusion that the other editor involved is just a vandal because that eliminates the possibility of a discussion and make it difficult for them to participate in the wiki process. You edit is probably correct in this case, however, that does not mean you get to call the other editor a vandal when all they did is change 'v' to 'r'. Viztor (talk) 21:43, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Special:Diff/902288743/902341706 was clear-cut vandalism of a very common kind, and all it takes to verify is that you check the source. When Musdan77 comes and gives you advice, just take it on-board. Sam Sailor 23:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor:: This is not a clear-cut vandalism as you suggested. Yes, you can certainly choose to be the meticulous editor who check upon every sentence IP user adds or edits and require sources for every edit, but it's up to you and so are all the editors involved. Policy has clearly stated what pending reviews are used for, in this case, it is clearly "broadly acceptable for viewing by a casual reader." Best. Viztor (talk) 00:56, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

(←) Pinging Kudpung who granted PCR to Viztor, please re-evaluate. Thanks, Sam Sailor 01:05, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Like I said, the policy is clear on this issue. You may want to push for policy change or offer advices in a less patronizing way. Thanks. Viztor (talk) 02:21, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

PC viewer

While we appreciate your enthusiasm, a favourite saying of mine is: 'We are here to build an encyclopedia, users who have joined Wikipedia primarily to police it have joined for the wrong reasons.'

When I accorded you this right I was impressed by your work on the zh.Wiki and assumed you would know what you would be doing on the en.Wiki. PC Reviewer is the easiest user right to obtain, in fact the first few thousand were accorded by a bot. However, it is also easy-come-easy-go so it must be done correctly.

I have therefore limited your use of this right to the end of this month (30 June 2019) when it will automatically expire. If your understanding of vandalism has improved in that time, you are welcome to apply again at PERM, where your editing will be reviewed again.

I am also asking you to refrain from making Non Admin Closures at AfD until you have made a full three months substantial editing to en.Wiki. and thoroughly read and digested WP:N and WP:DELETION. If you need any help or advice, don't hesitate to ask me or the editors who have already contacted you, many of whom are admins. Thanks. Pinging Hari147, Diannaa, Rosguill, SoWhy, Hugsyrup, Musdan77, Huon, Sam Sailor, RoySmith. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

@Kudpung:, Thanks for the pinging. Like I said to Sam Sailor, the policy is clear. Vandalism may exist in many forms, and the most obvious ones are filtered by pending change reviews, the truthfulness of the content are left with the editors who are familiar with the subject matter. I did exactly what the policy asked. Thanks. Viztor (talk) 02:40, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

NAC

Can you please explain your WP:NAC here? There was no clear keep consensus and it was just relisted by an admin yesterday. I'd strongly advise you refrain from performing NACs or even relists (see WP:RELISTBIAS) until you have a lot more experience in these areas, especially given your AFD stats. Praxidicae (talk) 16:22, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

I agree with Praxidicae. I haven't looked at your history of NAC or AfD iinvolvement, so I can't comment on that, but as far as WP:Articles for deletion/Dario Hunter 2020 presidential campaign is concerned, yeah, that wasn't a good WP:NAC. I'd recommend being more conservative about only closing AfDs which are clearly obvious. Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

RoySmith I'm waiting for a response but I have a lot more concerns beyond this....Praxidicae (talk) 17:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: A majority of the votes went to keep, and most delete vote also suggest merge, what's the problem of keep/merge closure? Viztor (talk) 06:36, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

@Viztor: AFD is not a vote. The quantity of votes do not matter, it's the quality and basis in policy and established norms. I'd strongly suggest you avoid administrative/experienced areas until you have a better understanding of this (several months and several more mainspace edits) including NACS. There are many messages here on your talk page about your recent actions, I suggest you take them to heart. Praxidicae (talk) 10:33, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Also, as I said, it was relisted by an admin, Randykitty just a day before. You as a non-admin, can't just NAC something that was relisted. Praxidicae (talk) 10:43, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: In this case, it is extremely unlikely the consensus would move towards delete, even in the case prolonged discussion. As most agreed that the person is notable, the question is more about "if we should have a split article". Should not something like that be debated on the talk page instead of AfD? Or that we would just let it run its course given its already there? Viztor (talk) 10:57, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Viztor To be quite honest, your AFD stats do not inspire any confidence in me that you can adequately judge where consensus might go but I would just continue to advise you as I have already done, to stop messing with AFDs other than commenting or voting. It must run it's course and if you insist on closing it or otherwise dabbling in maintenance at AFD, I will ask that you be formally banned from doing so at ANI. Additionally, you cannot just overrule an admin on an AFD who just relisted it a day prior because you had a random urge to do so. Praxidicae (talk) 11:04, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: I think I've asked a pretty clear question. I don't know why you start judging me instead of commenting on this specific question. It is not helpful. Viztor (talk) 11:15, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

And I've answered it, however I'll note the last 5+ threads here are people questioning your edits and asking you to stop - you've also failed to answer my question, as to why you thought it prudent to NAC an AFD that had just been relisted by an administrator? Praxidicae (talk) 11:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

@Praxidicae:I fully embrace questions but they must be based on reasoning and logic. The question is simple, since it's almost impossible this AfD proposal will result in a deletion, and with a consensus leaning towards merge/keep, do we let it run its course of seven days (again), or should the discussion be better conducted in its respective talk page? Viztor (talk) 11:31, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

@Viztor: I'm not sure what part of It must run it's course was unclear. Praxidicae (talk) 13:14, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

I'd also like to note that you cannot relist your own nomination. Praxidicae (talk) 13:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve 1978 in China

Hello, Viztor,

Thanks for creating 1978 in China! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

PC reviews

Special:Diff/898738670/902553114 was a change of "Raees Ahmadzai (September 2011)" to "Rashid khan (march 2019)". You reviewed and accepted the edit. A change of a blue link to a red link should always make you alert. A miscapitalization of a link should also make you alert. The first thing to check is if there actually was a change of goodwill ambassador in March, perhaps the IP editor just made a mistake when typing "khan", that is common on mobile devices, so you open the source. There you see that Rashid Khan has not replaced Raees Ahmadzai, both of them are now ambassadors, so you need to add Raees Ahmadzai back. Change caps to Rashid Khan, preview and hover over the link with Wikipedia:Popups, target is a {{hndis}} page. Open it. Rashid Khan (cricketer) is our man. Go back and substitute [[Rashid Khan (cricketer)|Rashid Khan]] (March 2019) for [[Rashid khan]] (march 2019). Preview as usual. Happy with it? Now you are done. Got it? If you want to go an extra mile since you are already editing, you could check red-linked articles for possible {{ill}}s (H:ILL). I did a few, see Special:Diff/902553114/902609334, and noticed that the red-linked Jose Manuel Calderón was missing an acute accent, but José Manuel Calderón is a redirect to the {{hndis}} José Calderón, so [[José Calderón (basketball)|José Calderón]] should substitute for [[Jose Manuel Calderón]]. This, naturally, is not part of PC review, it's just an idea to what can be done. In any case, please do not rush pc review, quality is more important than quantity. And do not hesitate to ask one of us for advice. Best, Sam Sailor 00:55, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

In a somewhat similar situation in Splash Brothers you accepted these two edits by a new editor. They have since been reverted. Please have a look at it again and identify, why the edits should not have been accepted, at least not without proper amendment. Sam Sailor 07:33, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Yangtze Delta

Hello Viztor. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Yangtze Delta, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not done, but I agree it looks like a reasonable proposal. More discussion needed here. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:34, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

~Swarm~ ^{sting} 04:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

INVOLVED closes

You should generally resist from moving pages that you have voted in a requested move for, such as Talk:List of national railway administrations. While this one was a unanimous enough to invoke WP:IAR, it is always best to stay away from dealing with moves where you were a part of the discussion. --qedk (t 桜 c) 06:02, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

a) WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY, b) this is not an WP:IAR case, an undisputed move request do not need discussion per move policy, hence anyone can move. Viztor (talk) 20:42, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Viztor, I believe what qedk means by invoking WP:IAR is invoking it for WP:NACINV and not the close. You essentially are in agreement with the first point,I believe. (talk page stalker) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 20:50, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

I appreciate the reminder. Viztor (talk) 21:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry about the late reply but my point was that you should resist from doing so, the policy (WP:NOTBURO) you cited in point (a) is a direct implication of the WP:IAR policy, which is a pillar of Wikipedia. So, no, I do not disagree in this particular case, but you should try to not make changes where you are INVOLVED, because eventually someone will claim you are biased and that will result in procedural overturning. --qedk (t 桜 c) 05:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Viztor! You created a thread called Validity of source in housing information at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aaron Swartz

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aaron Swartz you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Puddleglum2.0 -- Puddleglum2.0 (talk) 20:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Bonifacio Global City station

Not sure how I would have voted on this, but as a note, Loudoun Gateway station (a station on an extension of the Washington DC subway) was created in 2006 and is *supposed* to open next year. (and when the article was created, the expected completion was between 2011 and 2015. The same is more or less true for the other stations in phase 2 of the silver line.Naraht (talk) 18:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aaron Swartz

The article Aaron Swartz you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Aaron Swartz for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Puddleglum2.0 -- Puddleglum2.0 (talk) 21:41, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Puddleglum2.0 has withdrawn this good article review (Talk:Aaron Swartz/GA2, which was previously passed, not failed). The Aaron Swartz article is being sent back to the good article nominations queue, and another editor will review it. — Newslinger talk 05:20, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aaron Swartz

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aaron Swartz you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 11:00, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aaron Swartz

The article Aaron Swartz you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aaron Swartz for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 21:20, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aaron Swartz

The article Aaron Swartz you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Aaron Swartz for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Outline of the Palace Museum

Hello, Viztor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Outline of the Palace Museum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Robert Logan (naval architect) on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:K-128 (Kansas highway) on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:K-113 (Kansas highway) on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Frank Fowler Loomis on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Saturn V on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Interstate 840 (Tennessee) on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Queen Letizia of Spain on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sengkang MRT/LRT station on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Eber Brock Ward on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Verifiability on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Mathematics Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sylvester–Gallai theorem on a "Mathematics" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Matchbox Educable Noughts and Crosses Engine on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Mathematics Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ideal polyhedron on a "Mathematics" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Caldew (trawler) on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tyson Foods on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:K-156 (Kansas highway) on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:32, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Direct Rendering Manager on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Banning policy on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Christina Ricci on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Mathematics Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sylvester–Gallai theorem on a "Mathematics" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:32, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Miscellaneous Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Salyut 1 on a "Miscellaneous" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Involuntary commitment on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Assembly language on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Automatic scorer and Talk:Network synthesis on "Engineering and technology" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (people) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Uinta Basin Rail on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ayurveda on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Superstitions in Muslim societies on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Democratic Progressive Party on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Piccadilly line on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:East Taunton station on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Internment on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:White House COVID-19 outbreak on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Changxing railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Changxing railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Changxing railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Slatersteven (talk) 13:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Mathematics Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:E. T. Whittaker on a "Mathematics" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:O'Connell Street on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ontario Highway 144 on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Draft talk:Scott Dadich on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Mathematics Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:E. T. Whittaker on a "Mathematics" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:TERF on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:North Carolina Highway 133 on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Donald Trump and Talk:List of states with limited recognition on "Politics, government, and law" request for comments, and at Talk:Ivermectin on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment, and at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment, and at Talk:Chrissy Teigen on a "Biographies" request for comment, and at Talk:Newton MRT station, Talk:Kovan MRT station, Talk:K-53 (Kansas highway) and Talk:North Carolina Highway 157 on "Engineering and technology" Good Article nominations, and at Talk:E. T. Whittaker and Talk:De quinque corporibus regularibus on "Mathematics" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Uyghur genocide on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Thaddeus Fairbanks on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gateway Generating Station on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Astor Place station on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Chinatown MRT station on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Proud Boys on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment, and at Talk:GPT-2, Talk:United Airlines Flight 328, Talk:Kendal Green station and Talk:W. Wallace Kellett on "Engineering and technology" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Mathematics Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Fermat's right triangle theorem on a "Mathematics" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Mathematics Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Keller's conjecture on a "Mathematics" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Piaggio Stella P.IX on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Goths on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Charles Townsend Ludington on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Michael John Graydon Soroka on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Interstate 405 (Oregon) on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2021 Suez Canal obstruction on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rising Sun Flag on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Al-Qaeda on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Political endorsements on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pavol Hnilica on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Space Race on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:IBM ThinkPad 701C on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Body shape on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pre-installed software on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:IPad Pro (5th generation) on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Greater Germanic Reich on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Viztor! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over a year.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in two years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
3. Paste {{Frs user|Viztor|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)