Jump to content

User talk:Vikasksinsan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Vikasksinsan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page MSG: The Messenger have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!  Grayfell (talk) 08:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to MSG: The Messenger, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please see the article's talk page (Talk:MSG: The Messenger). If you know of a reliable source, you can include that, please don't expect others to do it for you. The current source says 9.92 crore, and that number should not be changed without also changing the source. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 06:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, you may be blocked from editing. NeilN talk to me 15:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shruti Haasan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -Managerarc talk 13:49, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, though you presumably mean well, this edit is problematic. Wikipedia is only interested in what reliable published secondary sources have to say about a subject. The content you provided is based on a press release[1]. Press releases are considered primary sources because they are written by people involved in X activity. If I am running a play in the local theater, I might send a press release to advertise in the local newspaper. Primary sources can be used sparingly for uncontroversial statements. "I am 23 years old." "My first job was selling ice cream." "The play is scheduled to open 5 July." But they should not be used for controversial statements that have not been independently verified, like "MSG grossed 126 crore" or "I punched an elephant in the face and knocked him out." This content needs to come from reliable published sources as a result of exhaustive research. Extra attention should be paid to whether or not the content being added might only serve to promote the subject, so please keep an eye out for that, as we are not here to promote. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:10, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 04:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]