User talk:Victor CWT

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Victor CWT, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as House (astrology). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Planetary Stock Trading[edit]

Please improve your page by mentioning references and categories. As you are new on Wikipedia, i'll try helping you with this article. But plz be careful in future, otherwise these kind of articles may be speedy deleted. M A A Z T A L K 14:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the tag about insufficient context. Plz try to increase the content of the article, and after that the tag will be removed. M A A Z T A L K 14:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Eclipses: Astronomically and Astrological Considered and Explained[edit]

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. Victor CWT, thanks for creating Eclipses: Astronomically and Astrological Considered and Explained!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. For articles about books, we need to hear what other people have written about it, eg book reviews.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Arcana: Or Stock And Share Key[edit]

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. Victor CWT, thanks for creating The Arcana: Or Stock And Share Key!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This should also have references from works that talk about this pamphlet

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Tunnel Thru the Air; Or, Looking Back from 1940, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Law of Three (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about LOMA 280 Principles of Insurance[edit]

Hello, Victor CWT,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether LOMA 280 Principles of Insurance should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LOMA 280 Principles of Insurance .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 11:03, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Square of Nine for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Square of Nine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Square of Nine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transit of Saturn: Critical Ages in Adult Life[edit]

The article Transit of Saturn: Critical Ages in Adult Life has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:NBOOK, and no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources to indicated notability per WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Pia Silva[edit]

Hello, Victor CWT,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Pia Silva should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pia Silva .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Vexations (talk) 23:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Louise McWhirter[edit]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://time-price-research-astrofin.blogspot.com/2015/06/spx-vs-north-node-louise-mcwhirters.html or elsewhere. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eclipses Astronomically and Astologically Considered[edit]

Hello, Victor CWT. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eclipses Astronomically and Astologically Considered, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:20, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Your addition to Ed Seykota has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:28, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Victor CWT. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Michael Alan Singer[edit]

Hello Victor CWT I have added projects Biography, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. ( To reply click "edit" next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 09:22, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Alan Singer[edit]

Hi Victor CWT,

Thank you for creating and improving the article about "Michael Alan Singer". I'm writing to you because I noticed that you don't add categories to your articles and that you also removed the categories after I added them. I just want to make you aware that categories are important features in Wikipedia that must be present in every Wikipedia article. They are always added at the end of the article and are in the form of "[ [Category : *******] ]". Please readd the categories to "Michael Alan Singer" and take care of categories in the future. Many thanks. If you need help, please contact me. --Brainist (talk) 11:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Ancient Science of Numbers for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Ancient Science of Numbers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ancient Science of Numbers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 06:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Arcana: Or Stock And Share Key for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Arcana: Or Stock And Share Key is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Arcana: Or Stock And Share Key until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 12:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neville Lancelot Goddard[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Neville Lancelot Goddard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neville Lancelot Goddard[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Neville Lancelot Goddard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neville Goddard. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jps (talk) 01:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neville Lancelot Goddard for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neville Lancelot Goddard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neville Lancelot Goddard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 13:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Planetary Stock Trading[edit]

The article Planetary Stock Trading has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced (the two citations simply repeat publishing data). The article info simply repeats what might be in book. Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – S. Rich (talk) 17:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]