User talk:Valiaveetil

Sockpuppetry[edit]

Whose sock are you? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? Valiaveetil (talk) 10:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Valiaveetil,

They mean, what other accounts have you used to edit on Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Valiaveetil, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbasulu. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Abbasulu per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbasulu. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 17:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Valiaveetil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not anyone's sockpuppet. I like to edit articles and give my verdicts. If my edits may violate any wikipedic rule, than anyone is welcomed to revert or delete those edits. Thank you. But I don't understand why I'm blocked. Valiaveetil (talk) 17:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:26, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Articles for deletion votes[edit]

I am User:LordVoldemort728. I saw you voting in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion but you are thinking wrong about Wikipedia:Notability guidelines. I can list many wrong votes which you voted like "Keep - The school exists." from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Public School, Hosur Road, "Keep - well referenced for a politician's biography. It has 19 references which clearly tells everything about his notability." from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta, "Keep - One of the bests in his field." from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishnu Govind (3rd nomination), "Keep - upcoming film of a superstar which is significant and big budget." from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thalapathy 67, "Strongly Keep - This woman is well-known director in UAE. Her biography should stay." from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ursula Manvatkar, "Keep - All the produced films have an wikipedia article and references." from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prithviraj Productions (2nd nomination), "Keep - Every genre of ragas or Indian classical music is welcomed in wikipedia." from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sushama, "Keep - All the produced films have an wikipedia article and references." from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benaras Media Works (2nd nomination), "Keep - popular TV show with a lot of reviewers online and a high TRP." from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laalkuthi and your the only word "Keep" from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mussoorie Municipal Council.

I also want to know that did you used any other account to edit wikipedia. I am also pinging @User:DaxServer and @User: Liz who asked you about Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry and also requesting User:Liz to watch your wrong and unmeaningful votes. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 17:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think we were probably editing this at the same time, LordVoldemort728 - this account is a sockpuppet of Abbasulu, who was the creator of many of the articles that these discussions were about. I have blocked both indefinitely. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes. User:Girth Summit submitted the discussion "Blocked as a sockpuppet" at 22:31 and at the same time I submitted "Articles for deletion votes". 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 17:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not anyone's sockpuppet. I like to edit articles and give my verdicts. If my edits may violate any wikipedic rule, than anyone is welcomed to revert or delete those edits. Thank you. But I don't understand why I'm blocked. Valiaveetil (talk) 17:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I said to you over at Abbasulu's talk page - you know perfectly well why you are blocked. You are using the same IP address, and the same device, to make these protestations on both accounts' talkpages. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]