User talk:Umayyad-387
 | Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history. |
January 2025
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Umar, you may be blocked from editing. Bowler the Carmine | talk 07:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm shocked by your removal of my additions to Umar page, citing unreliable sources. It's clear that in your view, Sunni books are unreliable, while Shia books are considered credible. Your understanding of Islam is lacking. Verified information about the Sahaba can only be found through Hadiths, not through sources written 1000 years later by non-Muslims.
Your bias towards Shiaism is evident. If you're going to promote Shiaism, consider renaming Wikipedia to ShiaPedia. I don't need your warning. If you want to block me, go ahead. It won't make a difference. Sunni Muslims will boycott Wikipedia from now on. Wikipedia has become a tool for promoting Shiaism rather than a credible source of information.
ANI notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is IDHT religious POV-pushing. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 13:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Iarsalanansari (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC) |