User talk:Uber555

Welcome!

Hi, Uber555, Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.

---

Additional tips

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

• For Wikipedia policies and guidelines see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
• Find everything in the Directory.
• If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
• Introduce yourself at the new user log.
• If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
• If you have edits from before creating an account try this.
• To Upload Images with the correct Copyright tags.
• Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Be Bold!!

You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

Joe I 02:30, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

err some1 made a penis homepage for me.(Uber555 04:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC))

That was some jerk running a vandal bot. He's been blocked and his edits are being rolled back. Sorry about that. Broken S 04:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)ok(Uber555 04:55, 27 January 2006 (UTC))

Re: why?

Usually becuase when I revert their vandalism, they see that I did it so they go and vandalize my user page. Thunderbrand 15:36, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Vickers Medium Mark I

Hi, Uber555! I expanded Vickers Medium Mark I. Some of the information is probably not reflecting the latest research, but all in all it has become a rather nice article, I think :o). Now we got to find some pictures that are free from copy-right!

Greetings, --MWAK 16:06, 8 February 2006 (UTC) thanks, yeah we need a photo and maybe one for vickers medium mark II(Uber555 21:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC))

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 0% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. (Based on the last 117 major and 12 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear inpolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 04:33, 18 February 2006 (UTC)ok mr. bot(Uber555 04:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC))

PROD warning

Hi there. I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Caesar c line, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (also see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues I've raised at Talk:Caesar c line or in the "{{prod}}" template. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

--Nomader 03:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)ill add a lot more info ok?(Uber555 03:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC))

Problem taken care of - another user stepped in and fixed everything. Article = Saved. :) that was me....(Uber555 03:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC))

Handhelds and 7th generation

Hi - am trying to work out what's gone wrong on the History of video game consoles (seventh generation) article. It says 7th gen starts 2005-11-22. But then it says it includes Nintendo DS which was released 2004-11-21. So wouldn't make that Nintendo DS 6th generation? --Oscarthecat 04:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Handhelds are a different story ... sure look at the release date and say this is sixth gen ... but the harware is much more advanced than the sixth gen GBA handhelds are different for handhelds i know ive wrote this on the talk page on either the sixth or seventh gen. Handhelds look at the difference between the sixth gen handhelds and the DS and PSP release doesnt matter as much as the hardware. And nov. 05' is for the big consles handhelds are very different. Look at the differences at Comparison of handheld gaming consoles (keyword) Uber555 04:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC) If it was up to me i would make the handhelds and the home consles diferent pages. As iv'e said amny times handhelds are very different than the home consles. Uber555 04:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks, I've added a sentence regarding this to the opening para, otherwise it's awfully confusing. --Oscarthecat 04:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

PSP

System software removed again, appreciate your participation in the discussion Talk:PlayStation_Portable#System_Software_removal. --Oscarthecat 20:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Little Willie

Hello, sir.

I am extremely interested by this comment: "I have first hand documentary film evidence of tanks being tested at the Wm Foster & Co site." I should very much like to have some more details, if possible.

Regards, Hengistmate (talk) 11:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)