Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Danielmartineckhart! Thank you for your contributions. I am WereSpielChequers and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Ϣere SpielChequers 22:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Daniel Martin Eckhart with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses (t) (c) @ 22:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I dream of horses Hi there. Thanks for your message. I had removed the questions regarding validity of some of the content on Daniel Martin Eckhart. This is not a promotional page - it is simply a correct representation. IMDB content is always verified and can absolutely be trusted. If there are ways you could suggest that'll help make the page more solid/verifiable for Wikipedia experts like yourself, please let me know. I'll gladly learn. Thanks for your help Danielmartineckhart (talk) 15:42, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, we don't regard IMdB as trustworthy and verified, since it's user-generated content. So, you'll have to use other sources to prove it's not a promotional page. --I dream of horses (talk) @ 03:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I dream of horses Thanks for clarifying - I thought of IMDB as rock-solid as I've known them to vigorously check. But good to know that Wikipedia is even more solid. I've now cleaned up the IMDB references - would appreciate if you could take a glance and see if that's better. Thanks Danielmartineckhart (talk) 19:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the London Screenwriters Festival seems like a good source to me; however, there are still user-generated content references (vimeo, youtube, the German Wikipedia, etc.).

By the way, if you really are Daniel, you may wish to review our conflict of interest policies--though, I do think you are allowed to bring sources to the table. I dream of horses (talk) @ 20:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I dream of horses Thx. Would you advise then to simply remove youtube and vimeo links? They are second tier verification that what is stated in the article is correct, right? As for the German Wikipedia - that's an unreliable source, too? As for conflict of interest, I have no concerns there. I'm not promoting anything. Wikipedia is a simple representation of publicly known facts. Danielmartineckhart (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by second-tier sources?

The German Wikipedia is user-generated content, and not verified. On top of that, circular citing is apparently considered an academic sin. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk) contribs @ 00:49, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barnaby Smith (novel)[edit]

The article Barnaby Smith (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 19:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Martin Eckhart[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daniel Martin Eckhart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 15:47, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite[edit]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=2oczE7SODTUnF5j_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_bBJFpyzH51jUfKB&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, TyronePower17. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Connemara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional listings[edit]

I (effectively) reverted your edits to Connemara because the works you added are either not themselves WP:notable or their authors are not notable. To prevent abuse of Wikipedia for promotional product placement purposes, such listings are not accepted. Please see WP:Wikipedia is not for the sorts of material that is not hosted. --Red King (talk) 20:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Martin Eckhart for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Martin Eckhart, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Martin Eckhart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Conflict of Interest[edit]

Hi there, I noticed that you have a lot of edits surrounding Daniel Martin Eckhart and associated topics like Connemara and Wychwood. Above you state that your name is Daniel. Is there a chance that you have a conflict of interest here? If so, you should probably declare it by adding the appropriate template to your user page (see WP:DISCLOSE) and following the guidelines at WP:BLPEDIT and WP:COISELF. Cxbrx (talk) 02:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]